did HE have anything to do with her death?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16153112/

(this one's for you M, lol)

-- Modified on 12/11/2006 1:59:42 PM

The guy isn't even mentioned in the article, but it's another chance to smear, even in humor (although you don't have any smileys up...I just can't believe even someone who is so hung up on Clinton would have intended this post seriously).

Here, this should make you happy...

http://www.amazon.com/Clinton-Years-Photographs-Robert-Mcneely/dp/0935112618/sr=1-1/qid=1165894024/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1009342-5403820?ie=UTF8&s=books

...Bushies are so boring, isn't it time to just say no and move on....

I've almost used up my quota saying bad things about the Bushes, but geez, Hillary has to rank as one of our Democrat's biggest disappointments. On the day that the Iraqi Study Group paper was delivered, she came out with Joe Lieberman against "violent" video games.

It was Congressman Kucinich who provided a useful CSPAN forum today to hear the authors of the Lancet study on Iraqi civilian deaths. As uncertain as Kerry's position on Iraq was during the 2004 election, it's crystal clear compared to Hillary's.

After all, the verdict of history argues that imperial dynasties are dead ends. It's really time to move on.

-- Modified on 12/11/2006 8:18:12 PM

don't even bother to read the article that you are siting.

DK is a visionary...which almost assures that he will never be elected in our modern political climate.

Almost as certain as DK never making it would be HRC.  Aside from the prejudice that more feel than would admit about a woman being president, Hills is too hated by too many to EVER be elected president...which makes her posturing a waste of time and money for everyone.

So...what to you think about Obama?

After six years of George W. screwing us all to hell, I'm in favor of a Democrat who can win.

This criteria excludes Kucinich (I agree, too visionary, not 'likable' enough), Hillary (can you spell triangulation),and Obama (talkin' the talk, is not enough).

There are others...Edwards, Clark, Gore (maybe).

But the key thing here is to throw those GOPers an anchor. It's helpful to have gained the Congress, but there is still untold mischief that Bush and his ilk can do, controlling the presidency.

One especially good thing to come out of the November elections will be Congressional investigations...those, and lots of subpoenas. Much like the Mafia, everyone knows that the GOPers make the biggest rats. All we need to do is give them have a chance to squeal (see Ambramoff)

I'm from IL, I know the guy. He's merely the result of a great marketing ploy. How could anyone think much of anything about him? What has he done? State representative from a nearly all democrat district. Ran against a last minute, carpetbagger candiate (Keyes) for Senate, so he didn't really win as much as he pretty well was unopposed. Been in the Senate for TWO WHOLE years. If he hadn't been invited to speak at the 2004 Democrat convention, no one would still not know him. He's a huge lib, who so far won't admit it and doesn't take much of a stand on anything.

Gosh, I guess I DO think something about him.

He sure talks the talk of an ultra-liberal, but I think he's just a manufactured political puppet... He's just there to get the attention of the minorities that vote-by-race reguardless of the issues or platform, then when they're hooked on his message, he'll step aside and throw his support to Hillary, the the mindless-minority-masses will vote the way he tells them to... He's just a tool...

My dog is as qualified to be President as is Obama. People throwing out his name can't be serious. If we can't do any better than that just leave the job vacant until someone qualified wanders by.

it's the hillbilly form hope all over again. these libs don't even know they are getting played.

here's a photo of slama-bama:

running around the White House in his underwear chasing the hired help, he never took time see what the CIA or NSA were doing

http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=244680772126935

tthen again, that lead to 9/11 and SH having WMD that no one can find...

I guess it comes down to priorities.....

must have fucked your wife.

or do in defense of this guy. I just like to draw it out of ya...

His whole Admin was filled with corrupt piece of shit like you too...Just ask Jim Webb.

LOL!!!!!

He's articulate.

He's smart.

He's black.

AND he doesn't speak in Rhyme.

He fits the casting call sent out by the Dems looking to knock off Hillary. Wait until she and Bill load THEIR guns.

about Herbert Hoover through the 1970s. We placed him in a home where he died a miserable old man. I can only assume since this is your reaction after 6 years of Bush, that you are on your way to a similar fate. You should seriously try to move on although I fear that it may already be too late for you.

maybe one day you'll get that 8x10 glossy signed, have your boyfriend sign it,

"To my biggest fan and staunchest defender"
The Disbarred One

lol

The Brits are saying that the CIA was eavesdropping on Diana's phone, but Homeland Security denies that the SECRET SERVICE ever gathered intelligence on Diana.


I guess this is the new strategy to lie without actually lying. I first noticed it before the elections. When Bubba Clinton said that he left a comprehensive strategy for dealing with terrorism for the incoming Bush administration, Condoleezza Rice shot back saying that Bubba never left any strategy for fighting AL QUAEDA.

-- Modified on 12/13/2006 9:38:49 AM

"Why are you people avoiding me? Does my withered face remind you of the grim spectre of Death?".

loser.

-- Modified on 12/13/2006 11:58:49 PM

You seem to be stupid enough to wind up there.

BILLKILE's Clinton fetish will have to be serviced some other way.

"Did the Clinton Administration Spy On Princess Diana? No.
The Lord Stevens report is released.

By Byron York

On Tuesday, writing about stories in the British press that U.S. intelligence services spied on Princess Diana, I wrote, “The first thing to remember…is that British press accounts can be notoriously unreliable.” Then I wrote, “We’ll know more about the story on Thursday morning, when results of the Lord Stevens inquiry into Diana’s death are released to the public.”

Well, the Lord Stevens report was released Thursday morning, we do know more, and it turns out the British press accounts were notoriously unreliable."

even MSD gets the joke.

your job as keeper of 'THE LEGACY" is unopposed

it takes a real moron to make that comment without knowing what he was looking at.

i think your just jealous

I touched a nerve. Ha! Ha! Ha!

not even, i know where and what the photo is,

armed with that and seeing your response, you'r e fucking idiot.

laugh at that hahaha

a nicer beach. If you knew what this picture was of you'd have some boy put his finger up your ass...oh...you do that even without knowing...never mind.

-- Modified on 12/17/2006 3:31:23 PM