...who obviously believes that "only little people pay taxes". He is not "from the people", but blatantly from "the rich". He is not "self made" like Gates and Buffett are but a "son of". He boasts of his superior education every chance he gets all the while trying to convince the world that he loves the "poorly educated". And that says the man who even in his Art of the Deal (great book by the way albeit quite revealing about what it is exactly that he is doing now and why too) divides the world into winners (like him) and losers (like you 86H13LTP and I).
Now onto the main event: Trump's main claim to his future success as president is that he'd surround himself with talented people who, like him, will be employing their talents to "make America great again". Really? Look with the way he run his campaign. How many campaign managers did he go through again? 3-4? And that is your expert on hiring the right personnel for the USA, Inc? Come on! You know he'd be chasing every shinny object that Chinese (and definitely Putin) would put in front of him in the direction that they'd want him to chase. If Hillary was able to have him chase her prepared pieces for the whole world to see, all Chinese would have to do is to give Ivanka some preferential conditions in China and they'd have him in their pocket. Talking about total disaster! He'd be such a disaster that he'd make you nostalgically reminisce about the loser that we have in the White House now!
Do you really believe that a person who inherited huge seed fortune from his dad and went through 4 campaign managers in the course of 1.5 year long campaign would make a good "country administrator"? Come on man, you don't really believe that.
Next point that you threw out there was "20 trillion in debt because of the establishment". You weren't talking about the Clintons there though, weren't you? Because during the 2nd term of the first Clinton we were way into the surplus, I bet you at the end of the 2nd Clinton we're going to be back into the surplus again. Wanna bet?
No matter how you slice it but the histories always repeat themselves. Clinton would inevitably mean scandals galore and Clinton would also inevitably mean great economy and you're making a lot of money - Bill, Hill - it's all the same shit man, they both would lead to a lot of soap opera, great economy and world in relative piece.
We fell 20 trillion in debt during the last two jokers we had (sorry the 2nd one is still dragging on but thank God not for long). I bet, you voted for the first idiot though, didn't you? Well, don't feel bad. I actually was fooled by both of them during their first runs
