Politics and Religion

Comaraderie
Once-Is-Not-Enough 41 reads
posted

Agree, but also bet, they get even more entertainment by banding together and a sense of comaraderie, no matter how they mangle the facts.

Biden to female student asking a question:  "You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier."

You can't make this shit up. ha ha  what a maroon.

The Dim establishment is freaking out. He was THE guy to beat Trump. I was more concerned with a Kamala Harris candidacy but that flamed out even more quickly.

 
Where do the Dems go now? Bernie? Bloomberg with all his issues? Teenaged Pete? lol

 
I really wonder if enough pressure is put on her, would Michelle jump in? Or Oprah?  

 
But of the declared candidates right now, I don't see any of them beating the Don and I dont think any rational person on the Left thinks so either, but we still have a LONG way to go, said Captain Obvious. lol

because he has his own money.  Everyone else is going to be in a fundraising hole after the primaries.  I don't think he has a chance.  Watching him debate Trump will only get those who are making a sympathy vote.  When Bloomberg speaks, its like watching paint dry.  Only the rabid Libs will be able to stay awake.  

He doesn't possess anything really that will turn the Dem base out in any real numbers. In fact, I think he will depress the Dim turn out. On the other hand, R's are fired up and ready go.

 
And I keep hearing one of the geniuses here say Bloomberg will crush Trump with the "air war" i.e. TV commercials which is insane.  

 
Everyone already knows what Trumps negatives are and they are factored in to his approval rating BUT Bloomberg is a blank slate to most of the country and is so much more vulnerable to the air attack.

Nothing sticks to Trump.  His nickname should be "Teflon Trump."  The half of the Libs that hate Trump will vote for the Dem no matter what.  Out of the other half, which are moderate Dems, Trump only needs about 10% to either vote for him or stay home (of a combination of both) and he wins by a landslide.  

WOW! Yes, he is quite concerned about it and said how the Dims take it for granted. Trump def making inroads there. I think the "DraftOprah2020" campaign is well under way. lol

and is no longer one of the LIb media "deniers" bodes well for Trump.

The Hillary campaign outspent Trump 2:1.  There's this notion, mostly on the left, that money invariably buys elections.  So on some statewide elections they keep pouring in national money hoping to flip state and federal houses and senates.  It fails pretty often.  Beyond a certain point, money doesn't move the needle.

Ever heard of the Koch brothers? Or Citizens United?
Selective memory much???

He said there is a theory that money wins election and that this theory comes from MOSTLY people of the Left and NOT that ONLY Dems throw money at elections. How did you even botch that?

 
One too many pina coladas today Ms. Keller or just your typical misreading of yet another post?

-- Modified on 2/10/2020 8:18:59 AM

Lester, with his foolish nattering, has earned his way onto a list of which you are the Top Dog. I read his headline and the first line of his post. Then I stop. And with you, I'm ALWAYS right.

In Nickspeak this means "I am lazy, not stupid"

 
But to the reader of any of Nick's post it's a difference without a distinction. Or to put it another way, does anyone really care WHY so many of Nick's posts make no sense?

Not to mention one of the biggest twisters of the Engrish Ranguage EVER and a logic-chopper extraordinaire.
Congratulations. You've got the market cornered.

members of the "crew" consistently gang up on you; Hack Dumby and GaGagging?

Agree, but also bet, they get even more entertainment by banding together and a sense of comaraderie, no matter how they mangle the facts.

Posted By: lester_prairie
The Hillary campaign outspent Trump 2:1.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16
~$770 M (Clinton) vs ~$452 M (Trump)
$770/$452 = ~1.7:1
.
As has been noted, Clinton failed to spend enough of those $ campaigning in several key states.
Trump, OTOH, didn't waste a lot of money in CA or NY or MA, populous states he had zero chance of winning anyway.  
.
Clinton spent: $770/65.85 votes = ~$11.70 per vote
Trump spent: $452/62.84 votes = ~$7.18 per vote

IF Trump had tried to win the popular vote by spending valuable resources in places like CA and NY and had lost the important vote, the vote of the Electoral College, you lefties would have laughed about what a political amateur he was and that he deserved to lose the election if he didn't understand the rules that have been in place since the 18th century.  

 
But that is NOT what happened. Trump the guy in his very first election of any kind immediately grasped the rules and beat the establishment candidate at her own game. Yet you libs are still whining that he lost the popular vote as we are heading into his inevitable re-election.  

 
BTW this was one of your better posts, your good ones are easy to pick out by their brevity. lol

Or at least with the exception of BobFromStateFarm no one has thought so for quite some time now.  SOME of us called it long before he even declared his candidacy that he had no chance, but some of the more obtuse among us didn't see the writing on the wall until just recently.

 
I know the MSM and the DNC has desperately been keeping his campaign on life support until SOMEONE besides Bernie can gather some momentum, but Super Tuesday may be the end for One Percent Joe, assuming he makes it that long of course. He's not looking good in Nevada and if he doesn't crush it in South Carolina he may be an afterthought by Super Tuesday rolls around

was just a boy; "Joe, one of these days, that mouth of yours is going to get you in trouble."  Except in Biden's case, one of those days is almost every day.

 
Biden is clearly the king of gaffe, as Trump is the king of lies/corruption.  Guess we do not live in a perfect world and are forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.

"that mouth will get you in trouble", are you suggesting Joe didn't give very good blowjobs to Obama, and that's why Obama won't endorse him?

Biden told a crowd yesterday he was running for the Senate.  Next he'll be telling us how he intends to unseat Herbert Hoover.

Hmm, Biden is up 18 in SC poll ahead of primary.  Is this the anti-Bernie vote the dems were hoping for?  

Register Now!