Write Review
2,076,654 Total Reviews 3,600 New Reviews
9,625 Users Online

Politics and Religion

40% Of Voters Open To Musk’s Proposal For A New Party?
cks175 52 Reviews 441 reads
posted

NEW: Poll finds that 40% of voters say they are likely to support Elon Musk's "America Party" if he decides to launch it, according to Quantus Insights.

The poll comes as Musk has threatened to launch his own political party over recent disagreements with the Republican Party.

"Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he recently said in a post on X.
Conservative pundit Steve Deace’s take:
But now let's tell the rest of the story, Paul Harvey.

According to Quantus, interest in @elonmusk potential new party was high, "Particularly among young voters (Republicans are making gains with) and Republican men. Skepticism remains high among older and Democratic voters."

In other words, all this will likely do is hand national elections to Democrats. Which is exactly why I strongly urge Elon to invest heavily in GOP primaries instead. That will be far less costly in time and treasure, and actually more beneficial to his cause.
Related Link: The Rest Of The Story

inicky4643 reads

It said 41% of Americans identified as Independent, with Dems and Reps only reaching 27% each.
I'd say especially if the Republicans foist this huge, steaming pile of shit on America with their BBB, even more Republicans will abandon them for a new party.

Related Link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2024/01/12/voters-who-identify-as-independent...

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion39 reads

If the BBB is successful in curing the country's ills, the GOP will remain in power for the next 12 years.  If it doesn't work, the Dems will take over in 2028 and turn this country back into an open-border shit-hole.

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion43 reads

run in 1992, Bill Clinton would have never been elected President in 1991, and we would have had four more years of George H W Bush.  

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan49 reads

…Bill Clinton would never have been elected President…”

 
Why no link to this assertion?  Because CDL pulled it out of his ass and flung it onto the board like a monkey flinging poo.  

 
Here’s a link proving Perot did not cause Bush to lose the election:

 
http://split-ticket.org/2023/04/01/examining-ross-perots-impact-on-the-1992-presidential-election

 
Willl CDL back up his OP with a link to FACTS which prove his assertion?  Of course not!
See CDL.  
See CDL run.  
Run, CDL, run!

-- Modified on 7/9/2025 2:18:34 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion39 reads

run by a UC Berkeley guy who used to write for the NY Times.  Why not just use Raw Story for your source?  I'm sure they agree with this guy.  You couldn't find any major legitimate news source to back up this claim?  I checked with RCP, and they said they don't know and because there are so many factors involved, we may NEVER know.  The real news places are not in line with your source, so what gives on that front?  Why did you pick this guy?  Is he the only one that supports the narrative you are HOPING for?  

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan40 reads

You try to shoot the messengers because you can’t contradict the link.  

 
According to their LinkedIn profiles, neither of the authors went to UC Berkeley nor did they work for the New York Times.  More CDL bullshit.

Keep running, CDL.

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17539 reads

That’s rich. Half of BigP’s posts are shoot the messenger posts.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4651 reads

Makes no attempt at all to rebut BigP's point.

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan48 reads

…what “shoot the messenger” means.  CDL didn’t criticize the message, I.e, the substance of the article.  Instead, he attempted to shoot the messengers - the authors of the article.  

 
CKS175’s post was almost as weak as CDL’s.  

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17541 reads

Look at BigPapasans’s reply. The topic is “shooting the messenger”.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4647 reads

Can ChicKenShit REALLY have missed the rest of BPS' sentence, which reads: "because you can’t contradict the link."
ChicKie is such a hack he's only good at busting himself with blatant distortions.
ChicKenShit shits again....

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!