Politics and Religion

brooks5 your comment is so weak. eomteeth_smile
bigguy30 70 reads
posted

Posted By: brooks5
is like being called ugly by a frog - but I repeat myself.  I am happy that you are entertained, and I did it without pictures!  
   
 my dad used to say an insult by a fool is a compliment - so  
   
 thank you  
   
 to be clear, I don't hate Obama (libs hate, humans disagree), I just find him, and his cohorts to be a rich source of stuff to make fun of - they are wrong on just about everything

brooks5141 reads

cons need to use lib tactics and Bork anyone crack-pipe Barry nominates

GTFU = Grow up

bigguy3090 reads

I guess stupidity is one of your calling cards?
Also now it's so what, when it's another President you hate?
Thanks for the laughs this morning.  

You grow up smart ass.  

Posted By: brooks5
cons need to use lib tactics and Bork anyone crack-pipe Barry nominates  
   
 GTFU = Grow up

brooks588 reads

is like being called ugly by a frog - but I repeat myself.  I am happy that you are entertained, and I did it without pictures!

my dad used to say an insult by a fool is a compliment - so

thank you

to be clear, I don't hate Obama (libs hate, humans disagree), I just find him, and his cohorts to be a rich source of stuff to make fun of - they are wrong on just about everything

bigguy3071 reads

Posted By: brooks5
is like being called ugly by a frog - but I repeat myself.  I am happy that you are entertained, and I did it without pictures!  
   
 my dad used to say an insult by a fool is a compliment - so  
   
 thank you  
   
 to be clear, I don't hate Obama (libs hate, humans disagree), I just find him, and his cohorts to be a rich source of stuff to make fun of - they are wrong on just about everything

about the justification to not consider a nomination from Obama, the real argument boils down to, if the Gipper were were alive today, and in his right mind, would he stand be what he said back then? Or, would he be a hypocrite, and change his tune.

Even retired Reagan appointee to the SC, Sandra Day O'Conner, weights in against the Senate Republicans and presidential candidates.

brooks584 reads

the rules have changed.  and a lib calling someone a hypocrit - PLEAAAAAASE!

it is time that the repubs take on the tactics of the libs and this lousy President and do whatever they can get away with to accomplish their objective

"Bork" whoever they send up or don't even consider the nominee

for my lib friends, in a language that you understand - "waaaaah"

All the politicos and legal scholars (e.g. Jeffrey Toobin) on CNN have virtually all said if the situation was reversed, a Dem senate would be doing EXACTLY the same thing.

The rest of this is just smoke and mirrors and feigned outrage all around. LOL

I think it makes it most difficult for Rubio, who wants to be seen as the new Reagan!   ;)

Of course that's what many of the nominee's do. Pull out Reagan when it suits them, when in reality they're nothing like him!  ;)

Whether the Democrats would or wouldn't is not really the issue. The issue is how it appears to the average Democrat and Independent, and if it energizes them to vote for a Democrat vs. a Republican! And, the Democrats can point to Reagan, and how they voted on and approved his nominee. The Republican can say it's different, but the average person will not see it, or view it as being substantially different. And, the Democrats can point to Sandra Day O'Conner, who, most people regard much more highly than the Republican run Congress!  ;)

If I were advising them, I would tell them to let Obama make a pick, have the R's vet the shit out of him/her, expose their flaws, and vote them down.

But if they keep the current course, that's fine too.

I really don't think SDO's feelings on this is going to sway the electorate at all.

Register Now!