... by the FBI and charged with criminal cyberstalking with the intent to kill or cause bodily harm by sending a tweet to a journalist.  The tweet contained a strobe which the vile righty sent to induce a seizure in the reporter, who he knew had epilepsy.  The reporter did in fact suffer a seizure because of the tweet.

What's even more concerning is the fact that according to the article 40 more such tweets were sent to the reporter.  

... who are least qualified to do so, I mean the trolls who try to shut down people who don't agree with their lies and distortions, the people who forget what the topic is but post their hateful comments about politicians who no longer are there in office and those who just want to repeat their talking points in print.

and his wife claimed he had a seizure. Did they video it? Do they actually have proof? Can we recreate the episode?  

There are righty retards and lunatic lefties, both of which espouse freedom of speech. However, more often or not they feel that that "freedom" belongs only to them. Both sides have resorted to violence and it only will end when the moderate leaders on both sides of the aisle say "enough" and go so far as to criticize and chastise their own extreme members.

Couldn't agree more. It appears jury was deadlocked on intent necessary to convict on the more serious charges, and I have no clue which political persuasion is more likely to attempt this sort of thing, but this kind of crime should have sentencing "enhancement" provisions. This like beating on a handicapped person who can't escape or a person over 65.  

...excuse for not having any reading comprehension?  Your fellow rightard was charged with sending a tweet with the intent to kill or cause bodily harm.  Whether the journalist was injured or not is totally irrelevant.  The crime is complete if it can be proven that the suspect sent the tweet and whether it can be proven that he had the intent to kill or cause bodily harm.  The FBI has shown that they have evidence that proves the requisite elements of the crime.  That's why they arrested him.

Twitter, who the fuck needs it?

If a tweet can cause a person physical  harm, stay off twitter.

Where in the NY Times article did it say anything about Trump being the reason behind the strobe attack? It doesn't but only says that Eichenwald BELIEVED it was because of his anti-Trump posts.  

That's what lunatics always advocate. I've come to the conclusion long ago that this nation is obsessed with crime and punishent, especially rape.

Yeah...Hillary is some kind of angel.

You are not one who should talk. How about the numerous back-stabbings, of your own kind (libs/lefties/dems). And of course there is the vile and disgusting bullying and abusing women.