He's not really a Red Sox fan. Sad to say, he's a huge Yankees fan. That Red Sox handle he took in for a while was just his lame way of joking, Putz that he is.
No, this is not about the size of GaG's Big Unit, with which he penetrates all those Costa Rican chicas.
But about a new weapon the USAF recently took acceptance of that will penetrate the deepest of hidden Iranian, North Korean, and wherever nuclear sites are trying to hide underground. The GBU, (GPS bomb unit), 57A/B is a 30,000 lb MOP bomb, guided by GPS signals to the target, dropped from high altitude with enough inertia to penetrate 200 feet of reinforced concrete before exploding it's 5,300 lb charge. Both the B-2, and B-52 will carry 2 each of these. The B-2 for a 6,000 mile range, and the B-52 for a 9,000 mile range. With in-flight refueling, target range is unlimited. Longest mission flown so far in a B-52 was a 34 hour bombing mission from Barksdale AFB, LA to Baghdad, and return to BAFB, LA, with a crew of four in the early Desert Storm days.
Israel would most like to have a couple of these, but first, we'd have to sell them a plane big enough to carry it.
A 30,000 lb MOP makes me wonder about collateral damage. Willy, got your knickers in a twist about spending defense dollars on this?
Let's stick with using a computer virus to disable Iranian software or , at worst, targeted killings of the scientists who make nuclear bombs.
And maybe the ones who made the GBU Penetrator will get the message. Remember Tom Lerner's great song about Werner Von Braun who made the German V 1 rockets and then went to work for the United States:
"Once the rockets are up,
who cares where they come down
That's not my department,"
Says Werner Von Braun
" In German and English I know how to count down.
And I'm learning Chinese."
Says Werner Von Braun.
Sounds relatively cheap while minimizing collateral damage. So you are OK with a CIA type agent putting a bullet in the head of a scientist at close range? Or maybe a little C4 planted in someone's car? Now I guess a Drone is out of the question, even if it could target just 1 person, no collateral damage, and at a much lower cost than big ass 30K pound bomb delivered by a B52. I'm starting to think you prefer the hand-to-hand type combat vs the vast virtual distances we use sometimes. Just trying to understand what's OK and not OK in marikod's world of defense.
significantly less expense, and we don't create a new generation of
weapons that have no purpose but to kill.
Those drones cost a million plus every time they fire.
Sometimes evil is not a matter of intent but of effect.
Who is really the most evil of evil doers: The terrorist who detonates a dirty bomb in New Your city, or the scientist who invented the technology? The foot soldier who plants a land mine, or the US company that makes them (believe it or not, it was a General Motors subsidiary- yeah, that is some of the jobs we saved with your tax dollars St. Croix).
Think about it.
it's well worth the money.
on something like this than $550 Billion on a bankrupt solar company with campaign kick backs to the fucking POTUS and his political hacks.
I would like to see them develop a drone with the ability to do face recognition and zero point fire capabilities. Fly over Iran or wherever and take out this one guy.
Now that's targeting killing.
If you know about this I presume the Iranians do, too. As a patriotic American I'm sure you would not reveal defense secrets, after all. So don't you think the Iranians are putting their facilities below more than 200 feet of reinforced concrete? No one has ever accused them of being stupid. Crazy, yes. But not stupid.
Especially when you are in the middle of a pack of them at Nordstrom. And they still think they can shop like its a open air bazaar in the Middle East (lol).
I'm going with the premise the brochure says 200 feet, but in actuality it's 400 feet.
paint all their statues flesh colored but cover up their privates? Sounds smart to me.
PS: How 'bout them Jints? Are your boyz enjoying the off season?
Is that a cultural thing? The only 2 times I've experienced a large crowd of Persians, once at Nordstrom, and the other at football practice. I volunteer as a d-back coach for a local school. I kinda have a built in preference to d-backs, and it ain't Persians. They were a bit upset when I cut their prodigy kid after the 1st day of practice. That kid had no purpose being on a football field, or any field for that matter.
Now I have to root for San Francisco. How embarrassing is that? It would be something to see the Harbaugh brothers in the Super Bowl.
-- Modified on 1/17/2012 8:00:38 PM
you are beneath embarassment. Even worse than if I rooted for the Jets. At long last, sir, have you no shame?
you are viewing this from a geographic perspective. You are either a Giant fan or a Jets fan. You don't cross the railroad tracks. Same for Met and Yankee fans or Cub and White Sox fans. I was born and raised in SoCal, so I don't have that, " Yo don't you root for those bums across town Pauli" (say it as if you are some NY Italian). P.S. I root for the Dodgers, but I'm also a fan of the Angels, primarily because of Mike Scioscia, best manager in baseball.
San Francisco is just a big liberal "ass fucking" city by the bay, but they are in the NFC West, which was home to the LA Lambs, oops Rams, which was my team. I don't like the Giants. The only teams I despise more are the Pats and the Cowboys. New England has surpassed NY as the assholes of the universe (lol), and that includes the Red Sox and Celtics. Think Red Auerbach and that fucking cigar, which would have been better shoved up his ass.
So no hard feelings. So I assume the 49ers will grab a little of Manning's ass during the game, blow him a kiss, I mean they are from SF, and still kick their ass.
-- Modified on 1/18/2012 8:20:35 AM
Actually, I was only kidding about the Jets. I prefer the Giants and Yanks but I'm primarily a NY fan and do root for the other teams. I'll also agree about the Red Sox, mainly because I can't stand their fans. As for Sunday, we shall see...Nobody gave the Giants much of a chance in Green Bay, either.
PS: I loved the Rams way back when their QB was Roman Gabriel and their top running back was Dickie Bass. They never could seem to take it to the next level though.
-- Modified on 1/18/2012 11:37:03 AM
As for Red Sox fan, just take liorr as an example, nuff said. lol
As for the Rams, I do have some fond memories of Pittsburgh kicking their ass in the SuperBowl. Of cours Kurt Warner did a lot better job a couple of decades later, but Anaheim was a distant memory by then.
He's not really a Red Sox fan. Sad to say, he's a huge Yankees fan. That Red Sox handle he took in for a while was just his lame way of joking, Putz that he is.
Of course you are right, but fuck you anyhow.
Why should we let the truth get in the way of a good story? lol
-- Modified on 1/18/2012 12:51:15 PM
Yeah, probably more like 400 plus feet when 30,000 lbs is dropped from 45,000 feet, and the explosion adds another couple hundred onto that. They better be dug in deep.
Btw, been to the Bazaar in central Cairo. What a fucking nightmare that place was.
...(I have a problem, leave me alone)...I'd have to say this is a total waste of tax payer dollars.
Let's test out worse case scenarios. What happens if Iran actually gets a bomb. What the fuck are they going to do with it? Use it? What the hell do they think will happen to them if they do?
Really, the only reason why we're opposed to them getting a bomb is because every chicken hawk from the atlantic to the pacific wants to overthrow Iran's gov't. Well, we been there, done that, got the T-shirt, not to mention the kidnapping of hostages.
Get the fuck off oil and Iran becomes about as important as Zambia. Problem solved.
They could use the bomb in several ways.
1. They could use it against Israel. They are radical enough to do it thinking no one would destroy that much oil. Not likely but possible. And it is possible they could become even more radical.
2. Provide terrorist with a small bomb and let them use it in NY, Wash D.C., Europe, anywhere. This is the more likely end game.
Just thinking down the road.
3) They could use it to blackmail other states in the region to gain even more control over Persian Gulf oil.
Re getting off oil, is a nice dream but will take decades to accomplish. As for the US wanting an excuse to strike and cause a regime change, it would do the opposite. Even the opposition favors a bomb and if their country is attacked they will, albeit temporarily, rally round the ayatollahs.
-- Modified on 1/18/2012 8:40:29 AM
Yep. Sounds simple and easy. Get off oil in America. Gee, that might only take 20-30 years at the very least.
Nice, in-depth, thought-out suggestion willy . . .
Pakistan is far more radical than Iran is. And plus it's a less stable government. Seen Pakistan's influence growing?
The only thing having a bomb prevents is the US overthrowing their government. We couldn't make this more clear. Dubya called Iraq, Iran, and North Korea the Axis of Evil. Well, the one thing Afghanistan and Iraq had in common was that they were defenseless. Pakistan has the bomb, and even harbored bin Laden, and they're our "ally". Why wouldn't Iran want to get the bomb?
If Iran used a bomb, they would be wiped out of existence. The principles of Mutually Assured Destruction still applies, except the destruction wouldn't be mutual. It would only happen to Iran.
Getting off oil would be easy, and could be done in 5 years or less, if we were committed to it. Brazil is already off of oil, and they're still a third world country. Why can't we do the same? We already have electric cars, for fuck's sake.
Brazil is energy independent because they discovered billions of barrels of the stuff off their coast.
Brazil, rather than being "off of oil" is a major economic power in large to having some of the largest untapped reserves in the world.
Our fucking government just bailed out GM and it sure as hell isn't going to give up on the auto industry in just five years. You say electric cars are the answer? Good luck putting the average American in cars that cost that much and have yet to full prove they are safe.
It will take at least two decades and more money than even President Obama and his liberal friends can spend to get us off oil. I'd love to see it happen but I would also love to fuck Tori Black. Ain't neither one gonna happen . . . .
If Iran used a bomb, they would be wiped out of existence. The principles of Mutually Assured Destruction still applies, except the destruction wouldn't be mutual. It would only happen to Iran.
Getting off oil would be easy, and could be done in 5 years or less, if we were committed to it. Brazil is already off of oil, and they're still a third world country. Why can't we do the same? We already have electric cars, for fuck's sake.
Brazil exports their oil and run cars on natural gas. Their goal is to have almost all public and private transportation on CNG except for trains. So yea we could say they don't use oil. The US could in fact do the same in 5 to 10 years.
That's not to say the rest of the world could do the same. Therefore, get rid of the idea that Iran and the oil will become another Zambia or Bum Fuck Egypt.
With your " Mutually Assured Destruction" theory Iran would probably get hit pretty hard if they used the Bomb but so would whoever the hit.
The danger is it would trigger a major war.
Hell, it would be fairly easy to do. All we gotta do is put the resources into it.
Look at how much resources we're putting into oil right now, just to continue using an established technology. How many trillions did we spend in Iraq to secure that oil for US markets?
JFK said we should go to the moon, and before the decade was up, we went to the moon. Now, no one in their right mind can tell me that it was easier for government employees to figure out a new science for space travel than it would be to transition from a car burning dinosaur goo verses burning plant goo or running on solar power, or running electric.
Hell, we're selling electric cars right now. It's not like we're talking about putting a man on fucking Mars.
It could be solar, biofuels, whatever works best, I don't care. We need energy that we don't import, because we can't afford to import energy anymore. We need energy that we can patient and sell the world so we have something else to back up the value of the US dollar. We need an energy source that is viable, but sustainable. 19th century technology isn't cutting it anymore, folks.
Yea we have electric cars, even electric motorcycles with a 114 miles range. GM said they would build and sell 40,000 Volts this year in the U.S. Now they say they hope to build and sell 40,000 Volts worldwide.
Most of the technical experts estimate it will be 10 years before we really have a decent electric car.
25 years before we have a chance to get off oil.
I know the Volt I have is a high priced piece of shinny junk. Would you like to buy it. I'll take a loss and let you have it for a mere $38,500. LMAO
I only use it to go to the casino 6.2 miles down the road because it uses a lot of gas. Well the Volt doesn't actually burn it but, the fucking tow truck that tows me to the garage and the gas burring loaner I drive home use quite a bit.
That's all they sold in 2011. Why didn't you buy a Toyota Prius? The Volt is what $40K, and the Prius is $26K. The Volt is a total waste of a car, but that's GM.
and it price was $40,000+. Todate I have had to have it towed twice.
But that's ok. I going to donate it to the Catholic church.
Would love to see a boat load of priest stranded on the freeway.
willy, if the only thing we wanted from Iraq was their oil, why didn't Bush, Sr. get it the first time the USA was there?
And Iran would become as important as Zambia? That's laughable, as China, North/South Korea, Japan, et al, would buy up all the Iranian oil they could get their hands on if we didn't.
Do you have any idea how much petroleum is used in the manufacture of items we use in our daily lives? Plastics, synthetic fabrics, tires for your electric cars, grease and oil for the bearings/gears in your electric cars, transmission grease for your wind mill electric generators? Grease and oil for everything that has wheels, or rotates, such as jet engines?
Lastly, how do you intend the electricity to be produced to overnight-charge tens of millions of electric cars? Solar energy, wind energy, lunar energy, lol? What's going to provide power to the electric plug-in recharge stanchions at every supermarket, mall, movie theatre, work place, parking lot, etc.?
Face it, oil's gonna be around for a LONG time....