Write Review
2,076,298 Total Reviews 3,502 New Reviews
9,143 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Erika Kirk’s Comments Not Carried Live By CNN Or MSNBC
cks175 51 Reviews 352 reads
posted

CNN and MSNBC are not taking the remarks of Erika Kirk live???

It takes a lot to surprise me.

This is shocking.

The BBC is taking it live!
MSNBC and CNN aren’t broadcasting Erika Kirk for the same reason the city of Los Angeles won’t fly the flag at half mast.  

It’s passive aggressive mean girls shit. Angry, resentful, bitter, hateful people. No decency. Not fit for civil society.
Related Link: Not Taking The Remarks Live?

followme28 reads

So they can go through the speech take it apart, twist and  dishonestly distort something she said, then misrepresent her.  

 
It’s what they do

ReplyQuoteReport
jazzman12184726 reads

You two are so full of shit it's coming out your ears. No news outlet is able or needs to cover everything live. Both CNN and MSNBC have played the video of her comments unedited.  I thought you didn't watch these networks anyway.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4624 reads

A typical half truth from these two partisan hacks.
Not to mention, ChicKenShit cut and pasted the post from X without quotation marks. If a lefty had done that, FelchQueen would have lambasted them for plagiarism. Proving once again he's an arch hypocrite.
These hacks aren't even good at being hacks.

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17524 reads

…cut and pasted the post from X without quotation marks
A half truth from the old man, to say the least. I inserted the post into a quote box, so quote marks aren’t  required. In fact, they would be redundant. Especially when I provided a link to said quote.

If you’re going to try to enforce the rules, the first step is to know the rules! 🤣

ReplyQuoteReport
LostSon29 reads

Posted By: cks175
Re: Nicky Fails At Playing Board Cop
…cut and pasted the post from X without quotation marks
A half truth from the old man, to say the least. I inserted the post into a quote box, so quote marks aren’t  required. In fact, they would be redundant. Especially when I provided a link to said quote.  
   
 If you’re going to try to enforce the rules, the first step is to know the rules! 🤣

Exactly putting it in a Quote box and a link? I think you’re covered!  

PS Icky is just sensitive about his plagiarist past.

ReplyQuoteReport
RespectfulRobert27 reads

Because being JUST a partisan hack is never good enough for him.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4623 reads

Trouble is, a REAL quote box like the one below also includes quotation marks.

ReplyQuoteReport
followme29 reads

I do not watch those networks.  
When did I say that …oh that’s right you just make up stuff and constantly lie.

 
Seems to me that they would consider it significant enough to air it live, as they would if it was the widow of a lefty.

ReplyQuoteReport
jazzman12184725 reads

Yes, I thought. I didn't say I know. But you seem like a Fox guy to me. I also didn't think that you are a cable news program director, but I guess you know better than the professionals.

ReplyQuoteReport
followme30 reads

I never said you said “I know” stop lying and misrepresenting what I post.
While I do watch Fox news I also watch other cable news outlets both conservative and liberal. I also watch local news too.
Having said that, I do not watch news 24/7, in fact I do not sit home watching TV all day. And I certainly do not sit inform of my computer posting all day/night (20 or 30 or more). I have a life outside of here.  

ReplyQuoteReport
jazzman12184725 reads

So let's focus on what you actually said: " So they ( CNN and MSNBC ) can go through the speech take it apart, twist and dishonestly distort something she said, then misrepresent her. it's what they do"

That tells me all I need to know about your prejudice and absence of objectivity. It's what you do. It's who you are. You have no credidability since your mind is not only closed but already made up.

ReplyQuoteReport
followme27 reads

Yours is closed locked and you threw away the key.

 
So you want to focus on what I said to divert attention from me proving you  misquoting me in another post.

Let’s continue with you misquoting me.
You stated “So let's focus on what you actually said: " So they ( CNN and MSNBC ) can go through the speech take it apart, twist and dishonestly distort something she said, then misrepresent her. it's what they do"”

Your lie included me saying (CNN and MSNBC) that is a lie I never put those in my post.

Then you say “That tells me all I need to know …”seems rather closed minded on your part, wouldn’t you say?

You base all you need to know on your own lie, so it seems.

 

Rave on

ReplyQuoteReport
jazzman12184726 reads

Come on now. Stop being so foolish. I put CNN and MSNBC in brackets to separate them from your quote because you were replying to the OP who mentioned these media outlets. If it wasn't CNN and MSNBC that you were referring to here's your opportunity to clean up your post. Oh wait that is who you meant so your snarkiness is gratuitous. I thought you said you had a life. Evidently splitting hairs and calling people liars is your life.

ReplyQuoteReport
impposter35 reads

Unclear writing or speaking is clarified by such insertions that do not alter the meaning. Whoever is transcribing or repeating a passage REMOVES ambiguity by such inclusions. It is VERY common in written works. People who READ will recognize such [inserted text] and know this.  
.
"Alan said, "He gave him a package for him to give to him.""
WHAT??? The person at the news conference (or whatever) and who saw the pointing and hand waving and understood the statement in context will write or report:
"Alan said, "He [Tom] gave him [Dick] a package for him [Harry] to give to him [Sam].""
.
Some writers remove the pronouns and insert the proper nouns:  
"Alan said, "[Tom] gave [Dick] a package for [Harry] to give to [Sam].""
The punctuation sets off the substitution.  
.
Misuse of pronouns is one of the most common ambiguities. "They ..." They? Who they? They WHO? becomes "They [CNN and MSNBC] ..." or "They ( CNN and MSNBC ) ..." or other stylistic variation answers the Q before it has to be asked. No normal person complains "I was misquoted!" when normal writing conventions are used.

Posted By: followme
Re: As for closed minds
Yours is closed locked and you threw away the key.  

So you want to focus on what I said to divert attention from me proving you  misquoting me in another post.  

Let’s continue with you misquoting me.  
 You stated “So let's focus on what you actually said: " So they ( CNN and MSNBC ) can go through the speech take it apart, twist and dishonestly distort something she said, then misrepresent her. it's what they do"”  
   
 Your lie included me saying (CNN and MSNBC) that is a lie I never put those in my post.  
   
 Then you say “That tells me all I need to know …”seems rather closed minded on your part, wouldn’t you say?  
   
 You base all you need to know on your own lie, so it seems.  
   
   
   
 Rave on

ReplyQuoteReport
Hpygolky32 reads

There were or are alot of people, even on the right who didn't really dig this guy.
Seem like the far far..far right party may have had him nuff'd..whats that say?
And I saw bits and pieces of her comments. Found it kinda strange.but I get it.

ReplyQuoteReport
Hpygolky30 reads

And seeing we’re all a bunch of Mongers with an eye out.. so I’ll ask  
Now I have NEVER seen or heard of Erika Kirk until yesterday.
But I gotta ask, did you asked yourself… would I or wouldn’t I..
Am I going to hell??

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion21 reads

I would only do her if she asked me to.  Granted, she was mostly quoting and talking about her husband, but my bet is that anyone wrapped up in her religion the way she is probably gives a terrible blow job.  With that said, I must say I have had SOME success in the past consoling young widows.  

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan26 reads

When I first read: "The BBC is taking it live!" I thought...
 a Big Black Cock was fucking her on a livestream.  :-D

ReplyQuoteReport
crsm2721 reads

Not going to hell and correct why we are on this site......  She is a looker...nuff said for me.

 
To comment about BJ's and religion..... I have quite the opposite experience.    Chicks that are rooted in religion tend to give better BJ's because they don't give up the cookie.   So they get better at other skills.

ReplyQuoteReport
Hpygolky30 reads

“ Erika Kirk can't carry Charlie's legacy — his entire ideology doesn't even allow women in positions of power. Y'all chanting 'she'll continue his work' while his work was literally about keeping women silent.”

🤔🤔🤔🤔

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!