Note: This poll was taken before President Trump’s wildly successful Middle East trip.

Especially. as you point out, when the change is within the margin of error.
Also, most of the other polls are negative as well according to the RealClearPolitics average.

You make a good point there. On the other hand, it’s a positive trend showing up in his worst poll (using a spread metric) or second worst poll (using approval number metric).

They’re about as popular as freeway potholes.

One small improvement within the MOE is hardly a trend.

He is the LOWEST rated president in the history of polling this far into his presidency. Stop being a hack.

I post one of Trump’s lowest polls. Would a hack do that? No.
I point out of that low poll has him edging upwards. You object. What a hack.

Is Reuters “bogus”? Are they “hacks”?

Remember when I had to bust you on ALL those? This is just more of the same. It's pathetic you would try and make something of a minute bump when again, he is still the LOWEST ranked president in polling history.

Replying back to my same post twice is bad enough but showing a poll at a lousy 44% less than 4 months into his presidency is hackery at its finest.

So it was hackish for Reuters to cover the Ipsos poll with a stand alone story?  And it’s “desperate” for me to post one of Trump’s most negative polls?! The reality is that you know the upward tick in this poll is a harbinger of things to come, and that pisses you off to no end.

I called you one.  
.
"A harbinger of things to come." Exactly what a hack would say! hahahahahaha!

He's a prescient

So it’s legitimate for Rueters to cover the Ipsos poll, indicating they thought it was newsworthy, but hackish for anyone to repost that story on a political forum? Very shifty logic. I guess we shouldn’t expect less from an Islamophobe.

It's hackish to frantically mis-characterize its significance.

-- Modified on 5/16/2025 3:15:15 PM