One can only hope they choose wisely.

The main differences between Trump vs Clinton:

1. Experience: Clinton has plenty of experience as a prominent politician and public servant. Trump has zilch.

2. Temperament: Clinton has shown that she cannot be rattled and has ice water in her veins when the pressure is on. Trump is an emotionally disturbed narcissist who can easily be baited by anyone who says anything negative about him.

3. Ideological consistency: Clinton has spent her whole career as a mainstream Democrat. Like it or not, you know what you’re getting. Trump has had–and continues to have–trouble being consistent on a wide variety of political issues of the day. Were he elected, I don’t think anyone’s too sure what we’ll be in store for.

4. Establishmentarianism: Clinton is almost the definition of an establishment politician. She works within the system. Trump is quite outside of the establishment, as evidence by his own party leaders to get behind his campaign.

5. Clinton operates well within the bounds of what is commonly accepted in presidential politics. Trump has broken many of the rules about who you can insult and why. Trump is especially noted for his robust insults to people of color, women and the disabled.

END OF MESSAGE

his posts are rather insightful.  You on the other hand have set the bar rather low and with each subsequent post continue to set the bar even lower.  Wonder why?

...just another TROLL, if you don't respond IT (86h13ltp) will have nothing to post.

If you want to see about the case on December 16th.
Just look it up and it's bad.

So the GOP cult and their nut job supporters, can try to make up bullshit charges against Hillary.
They better worry about this asshole first, before getting too happy.
If they vote for him and he loses this case or the many others.
It can always be used against his supporters around the country. -- Modified on 10/29/2016 10:57:24 AM

to ruin NSF on 1-5 .

......I raised for a candidates fitness to hold the office of POTUS.  

where your mouth is and like all leftist cowards you crawled back under your rock with your tail tucked firmly against your balls . 10 rounds for 10k from the 600 with iron sights on old M1s . It's a standing offer mouth .

-- Modified on 10/29/2016 12:39:13 PM

1. Her experience is primarily composed of certified failures and covert corruption.  

2. If  you believe laughing about an illegal, brutal  killing, accompanied with sword sodomy, of the leader of an African country is an honorable position, Evil  HRC is your gal.
   By the way, how are things going in the formerly  prosperous African nation, Libya?  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlz3-OzcExI

3. If you haven't noticed how many times corrupt  HRC has changed her mind, you must be a blind supporter.

4. Most Trump supporters are not establishment clones.  

5. A recent insult from ISIS mother, despicable HRC, calling half of Mr. Trump's supporters, deplorable.
   
   I won't bother to list all the women sleazy HRC has insulted.  

Is there even one coherent idea in your post?  If so, you may need to get someone you know, who speaks English, and has at least a GED, to elaborate.  Like all of your other posts, this one makes no sense.

Could your advanced age be hampering even your limited intellect, from functioning properly?

END OF MESSAGE

On bullet point 3, we have a problem which might become an original classic.

Secretary Clinton has lived through this country's evolving mindset. Her stand has evolved as well. When she started out, for instance, the idea of gay marriage was a joke. Also, the Civil Rights movement was at a different stage, getting voters rights and ending Jim Crow was the goal. Now new challenges face minority groups, and the melting pot is less a goal than harmonious multi-culturalism. Trump had never engaged in public service so he isn't battered by past mistakes.

But he's 70 years old, not really a wunderkind, but a slick con artist. The politics work for him when he'd running, but as far as doing the job..? At 70 he might as well run off with a circus and work as a tightrope walker.

The Clinton-Trump Dilemma happens frequently enough but had never before had a clad disc case to give it a name.  

the wornout catcher's mit

I know you are a cult supporter, but you sound so stupid.

...her self-serving nature. Both Clintons have used their political positions for personal financial gains. It's ridiculous that she was paid 675k for 3 speeches to GS and 250k for one speech to a Brazilian bank.

Nevertheless, I will still vote for HRC because she is knowledgeable, has the temperament to hold the highest office, isn't rattled easily, and has unmatched experience. I actually prefer a Washington insider than a sociopath businessman with unstable thoughts and has no prefrontal restraint.

Little Marco is free to express his man-crush for the "conman".