"Denmark in âcrisis-modeâ as Trump sets sights on Greenland after Venezuela attack"
From the article . . .
-
âWe need Greenland from the standpoint of national security and Denmark is not going to be able to do it, I can tell you,â Trump said Sunday on Air Force One, echoing similar remarks made separately to The Atlantic magazine.
.
âI have to say this very directly to the United States: It makes absolutely no sense to talk about the need for the United States to take over Greenland,â Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Sunday in a Facebook post.
.
âThe Kingdom of Denmark - and thus Greenland - is part of NATO and is therefore covered by the allianceâs security guarantee. We already have a defense agreement between the Kingdom and the United States today, which gives the United States wide access to Greenland,â Frederiksen said.
.
Trump has long advocated for control over Greenland, a vast and sparsely populated territory rich in minerals that is strategically situated between Europe and North America.
.
Opinion polls have previously shown that Greenlanders overwhelmingly oppose U.S. control, while a strong majority support independence from Denmark.
.
Katie Miller, the wife of top White House aide Stephen Miller, posted to X a map of Greenland covered with an American flag with the caption âSOON,â shortly after Maduro was captured on Saturday.
-
http://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/05/venezuela-attack-denmark-in-crisis-as-trump-sets-sights-on-greenland.html
Congratulations to Ole Miss for playing well in a poorly officiated game. I will be rooting for the Canes.
-
"Yes, the 2026 Sugar Bowl between Ole Miss and Georgia was widely criticized for poor officiating, particularly a missed facemask penalty on Georgia and a questionable pass interference call late in the game that favored Georgia, sparking accusations of rigging from fans and analysts despite Ole Miss ultimately winning. The game's chaotic ending, involving missed calls and confusion over the clock, intensified the controversy surrounding the referees. - Gemini AI
-
https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/refs-accused-blatantly-rigging-ole-044751581.html
-
But enough about sports, let's get back to discussing politics.
But there's something about Curt Cignetti I don't like. He looks like a sullen, constipated conservative, lol.
J'adore! Words cannot express how much I enjoyed this snippet of dialogue...
From The NY Times:
"Even as Venezuelaâs interim leader, Delcy RodrĂguez, offered to work with the United States âon a cooperative agenda,â President Trump on Sunday night doubled down on his assertion of direct control over Venezuela, saying that his government was âin chargeâ of the country. That contradicted comments hours earlier by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who suggested that the administration would instead coerce cooperation from the new leadership in Caracas.
Mr. Trump also suggested that the United States could take action against more countries, including Colombia, Mexico and the semiautonomous Danish territory of Greenland. Asked whether that could mean a U.S. operation against Colombia, he said, âIt sounds good to me.â In response to Mr. Trumpâs comments in an earlier interview that âwe do need Greenland,â the prime minister of Denmark, a NATO ally, urged him to âstop the threats.â
Oh, and don't forget his threats against Iran.
Greenland isn't being run by a criminal wanted on charges.
It's not a false equivalence if the U.S. takes Venezuela for it's oil reserves and takes Greenland for it's land because are both are illegal acts of imperialism and colonialism.
US did the operation to ARREST someone. That is what they did. You are making assumptions about the oil. So again..... false equivalency.
You and others are making shit up in your mind. What happened was an ARREST of someone. Same person Biden administration wanted out of office. Biden administration was putting sanctions on him, they said he stole election, etc. Also the US has done the same types of operations in the past. History people.... learn it. But now that Trump did it.... it is wrong?
Referring to Venezuela's oil reserves "and it goes also to the United States of America in the form of reimbursement for the damages caused us by that country," Trump said. Thus it is no "assumption about the oil." It's what Trump actually SAID.
This was FAR more than "an ARREST of someone." It was an oil grab and regime change, exactly what Trump told voters last year he was against.
removing the head of state isn't regime change. And we don't even know how long the current regime will last. If they don't play ball they will be removed. Will ChicKie be satisfied then? Probably not.
How often does law enforcement spend hundreds of millions of dollars to arrest someone in a sovereign country? Not often. Noriega in Panama in 1990 was controversial and thought to be unnecessary. Bin Laden in Pakistan, but he attacked America and killed 3000 America. I am hardly making assumptions about oil when that's all the trump is talking about. You are such a trump apologist you can't handle the present so don't lecture us about past history.
Read how long has Murdo been on the radar for the USA.....
The "assumption" people are making is we will take over the country. Getting some contracts/trade for oil is a different story. So again.... wrong comparing the two.
Who's Murdo? At least spell his name right. It's trump who is saying that the U.S. will run Venezuela and that it's about their oil. It's trump that's saying that he wants to take over Greenland. Listen to what trump says and does and stop being a trump apologist.
How long "Murdo" has been on our radar is NOT what we were talking about. YOU said this was all about an arrest. We proved otherwise. Yet you continue to bob and weave. And Trump did NOT say anything about "Getting some contracts/ trade for oil." He said we were going to "run" the country and TAKE some of its oil.
Remember when Bush and Cheney said we'd invade Iraq, take their oil and the whole invasion would pay for itself. And yet it cost us trillions.
Your position on this is foolish, idiotic and in defiance of the facts and reality. Typical righty.
So you don't think we will get contracts for oil after all of this? You don't think we will get other things after this? We did confiscate some tankers.
WAKE THE FUCK UP. It is about relations with this country and this country to cut ties with CHINA.
we will now get contracts for oil. JUST LIKE BUSH was trying to do with Iraq. You know after you kick out a dictator and help install a new leader. You hope they do better trade with the country that helped them. You don't just "take over" their oil, land, resources. You pay for them. If you just "take them" invasion. We didn't INVADE. We are not taking over the country. This is being made up by DEMS.
For fuck sake people. I am giving you a time line of how Obama, Trump, Biden, Schummer, etc. All have said MADURO is bad and needs to be taken out of power. Now dem's seem pissed that it is done. All because Trump did it. Hell in 2020 Schummer gave a speech saying Trump need to do MORE.
Yeah.... what you and everyone is not understanding is we will hopefully get oil, trade, etc. Contracts after the smoke clears and a new government/leader gets going. We get better relations. China doesn't get that trade.... we do.
FUNNY..... isn't it. Look how the USA is getting contracts for OIL... paying market price for it. They are also helping the ramp up production and future oil production. Taking it away from China, Russia, and IRAN.
They didn't "TAKE IT"... .like people were kicking and screaming about. But bought it under contract.
"Venezuelaâs state oil company released a statement Wednesday afternoon confirming that negotiations were underway with the U.S. government, but stopped short of saying there was a deal in place."
First you say we are "Taking it away from China, Russia and IRAN."
Then you say "They didn't 'TAKE IT'"
Talk out of both sides of your mouth much?
You are a babbling fool.
OMFG...... liberal being a liberal again.
Yes we are TAKING OIL away from China, IRAN and Russia.... the MILLIONS of barrels that won't be SOLD to them. That is TAKING IT AWAY. For Christ sakes you keep proving the stereotype over and over again.
You have TRUMP saying the deal is done and Venezuela is saying they are working on it. OK.... so they are working on CONTRACTS.... not the "theft" like you and other kept implicating what was going to happen. The "invasion", "taking", etc. of oil. So you were WRONG. They are working on purchasing oil. I am sure what is getting hammered out is the amount, time frame, delivery, and how to distribute/control of the money/payment. Trump wants to control how/where the payments go inside of the country and I am sure Venezuela wants a little more say in that.
Again.... you and others were saying or "fear mongering" Trump was going to steal and just seize the oil and I was saying we will go in get contracts for oil production. Who was correct.... The contract will hopefully help stabilize the country. Yeah.... the liberal media and liberal mind hive goes apeshit and doesn't understand these things. Just like you don't understand when the USA gets contracts for MILLIONS of barrels of oil.....that oil wont go to other countries. Which is TAKING THOSE CONTRACTS or BARRELS away from those countries.
You wrote an incoherent, contradictory sentence. I pointed it out. You sobbed that I was mean again. Then you tried to re-explain and clean it up. You have no idea what the ultimate deal will be or whether it will be fair to the people of Venezuela. You just assume it will be fine because you are a slave to Trump.
HOW? If one country gets oil from contracts it is "taken" away from others......isn't it?
You are just a liberal being a fucking liberal. Thank you again for keeping the stereotype alive.
Now if you wanted to debate the narrative that this is going to piss off Russia, China.... and possibly cause Russia to say FUCK YOU and not stop anything in Ukraine. Yeah.... that is a real concern. Or now China will say FUCK YOU and just take Taiwan.... yeah another concern.
But NO..... you got to be an idiot and argue about "Taken" ... when in fact if one person doesn't get the goods... that means the opportunity is TAKEN away from the other person to obtain those goods.
Do you know what "fungible" means? Probably not.
In case you missed it, Russia has its own oil. China can get its oil elsewhere. Trump didn't "take" oil from anyone.
You are just a stupid person being a stupid person.
So when one thing is not offered to someone else anymore.... it is TAKEN AWAY from that person.
China, Russia, Iran.... all were getting OIL from Venezuela. So yes.... it is now TAKEN away from them. They can't get oil from that source and will have to find new source or have "less oil" at their disposal.
If you are living in a town with 1 grocery store. Then you are not allowed to shop there..... That store was "taken" from you and now you have to go find a new store to shop from. It is one less option for you.
But yeah.... keep being a fucking typical liberal. Thanks for keeping the stereotype alive. Can't argue about the facts but have to nit pick about a fucking word "taken". Yet we have TAKEN A RESOURCE OUTLET AWAY FROM RUSSIA AND CHINA. Which will help facilitate better trade and policy negotiations....hopefully.
And you are also ignoring the fact that I SAID China did import Venezuelan oil but can easily replace it from other sources.
NO SHIT THEY CAN REPLACE IT.....
But they cant replace it with Venezuelan oil. THAT IS THE FUCKING POINT. They also wont be getting other good trade deals from them. Be it gold, silver, minerals, crops, etc. That is TAKING FROM THEM.
Do you not understand you are "moving the goal posts" by saying... well they can replace it.... or they have their own reserves. NO SHIT and YEAH I FUCKING KNOW THAT. But when I said "taken from" i was meaning what I said... with that they will not have the opportunity to get these resources from Venezuela. And you fucking go off on the word "taken". Liberal being a fucking liberal... .when proven WRONG.
You are simply too dumb to know it.
For example, I never said "they can replace it." They don't NEED to replace it. They aren't replacing it. They weren't using it to begin with, you monumental buffoon.
The ones who need to replace it but can't afford to are the Cubans.
But keep on demonstrating your complete ignorance of the oil markets and the current situation.
This guy is retarded bud. Like legit on the spectrum.
Let it slide...
I have him on mute so he cant see this
....Panama took 10 days and over 24,000 troops!
Because Panama was a complete takeover of the entire Canal Zone and Panama City. Venezuela was a smash and grab. Brilliantly executed but a MUCH smaller operation that left us in control of no territory.
Get it now, snafool?
Tell me you are a dunce without telling me youre a dunce
Great job!
WTF are you talking about? Just curious if you are joining the debate or just making inane comments?
The moment you brought up colonialism i could tell you are a fool. A fool that is defensive lol.
Colonialism lol. Lmao
Carry on!
How are the actions and rhetoric of this POTUS not colonialism? Not imperialism? Perhaps you lack the intelligence to comprehend reality.
Im pretty sure you would stuggle to define either terms if this was irl and you were put on the spot with no google.
Im sure it sounded cool on those memes though.
Ill also bet you couldnt explain your point without rehashing what others say. Proof of this is very clear in many of your posts regarding politics
You're pretty sure of yourself, but that's the case with most MAGA minions. Your claims are unsubstantiated and weak. It suggests your inability to make an intelligent argument to support your allegation regarding colonialism/imperialism. Bring it on or are you not so ready to rock after all?
Calm down, Dork. You dont talk like that irl. No need to act tough on the net. Tranquilo.
Im not maga. Far from it. Just calling it like i see it.
Any claim ive posted is most definitely substantiated
Or else i wouldnt post it. Im not here to troll or argue im here to prove factual point. Can you say the same?
Like i said, without google you cant define colonialism. Just stop.
So where's your so called "factual points"? Seems like you've suddenly appeared on this board to post insults and your opinions that you describe as "calling it like I see it". Knock yourself out Rocky but noboby cares about your insults or opinions. If you're here to engage then bring it on - make an intelligent argument. If not your insults and opinions are a waste of time.
Where have i insulted anyone that did not go down that road first?
I havent.
And if you want to see fact, just check out my posts on here. Nuff said, Dork. Like i said, calm down.
Why would anyone be interested in anything that you've posted? I don't know who you are or what's your game. I do know that your posts are meaningless, your opinions are worthless, and that you are trolling this board. Knock yourself out, troll.
Never mind, he just "announced" on the GD Board that he was flouncing off in a huff. I guess those bad Boyz hurt his lil' feelers. No loss.
I, for one, am sorry to see him go. If only because I was waiting for our resident Felcher to welcome him with open arms despite the fact that he mainly reviews TS Girls.
I'd say it's a perfect name, lol!!
"Donald Trump Says He Wants 'Ownership' of Greenland Because It's 'Psychologically Important for Me' "
From the article . . .
-
During a two-hour sit-down with multiple Times reporters on Jan. 7, Trump was questioned about why he won't just send more American troops to Greenland â which is legal under a Cold Warâera agreement â if his goal is to fend off foreign threats. The president replied by saying that he won't feel comfortable unless he owns the island.
.
"Why is ownership important here?" [New York] Times national security correspondent David E. Sanger asked.
.
"Because thatâs what I feel is psychologically needed for success," Trump, 79, replied. "I think that ownership gives you a thing that you canât do, whether youâre talking about a lease or a treaty. Ownership gives you things and elements that you canât get from just signing a document, that you can have a base."
.
Trump also told the Times that he isnât opposed to using nuclear force if he âneeded itâ to take over the Arctic island but that âit might upset NATO," since the island is a self-governing territory of NATO member country Denmark.
.
"Denmark is a loyal and strong ally. We are in the midst of a significant rearmament, and we are ready to defend our values â wherever it is necessary â also in the Arctic," [Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen] continued. "We believe in international law and in peoplesâ right to self-determination. Thatâs why we uphold the principles of sovereignty, self-determination and territorial integrity."
.
. . . just "one thing" stands in the way of [Trump] and world dominance. "My own morality. My own mind," he said. "Itâs the only thing that can stop me.â
-
http://people.com/donald-trump-wants-ownership-greenland-psychologically-important-11883940
-
Bottom line: Trump is a dangerous megalomanica
They sent thousands of troops to Afghanistan and 43 were killed over the years there. Denmark is a tiny country and this was not an insignificant number for them.
Most depictions of continental Greenland are exaggerated due to the use of Mercator projection to transfer a spherical surface to a flat map. In actuality, Greenland is only about 1/3 the size of the continental U.S.
http://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/1hxgq6a/actual_size_of_greenland_or_how_mercator_incl/#lightbox
-- Modified on 1/16/2026 6:59:41 PM
http://www.tiktok.com/@thedailyshow/video/7595990552600972557
-- Modified on 1/17/2026 9:50:07 AM
"In response to increased security concerns, NATO allies including Germany, France, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, and Finland are deploying small numbers of military personnel to Greenland for joint exercises and surveillance, led by Denmark, which is responsible for Greenland's defense. These deployments are part of Operation Arctic Endurance, a coordinated effort to bolster Arctic security and respond to potential threats, particularly after recent rhetoric from U.S. President Donald Trump about acquiring Greenland."
....and it was only in the last couple months has Denmark given a shit either. Now, they're trying to act like they're doing something by using it as a strategic defense position. Just like fucking NATO, propped up and maintained largely in part by the US military and the American tax payer.
"Recent security concerns" my ass...the euro cucks are desperate to be seen as relevant. The Minnesota Deer Hunters Association is a more formidable force than fucking Germany right now.
From the NY Times:
"President Trump announced in a social media post on Saturday morning his latest strategy to get control of Greenland: He is slapping new tariffs on a bloc of European nations until they come to the negotiating table to sell Greenland.
Greenland is a territory of Denmark, which will be hit with a 10 percent tariff on all goods sent to the United States beginning on Feb. 1, Mr. Trump wrote in a social media post. Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands and Finland, fellow NATO members that have expressed solidarity with Denmark in its refusal to yield to Mr. Trumpâs demands, will also be subject to the 10 percent tariff. If those nations do not relent, he added, the rate will increase to 25 percent on June 1, âuntil such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.â
The threat comes as the Supreme Court weighs overturning the legal authority that the president would likely use to impose these tariffs. The court is set to rule in the coming weeks on Mr. Trumpâs use of an emergency law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which the president has used to threaten tariffs at a whim against numerous countries over the past year.
If the court rules against Mr. Trump, the president may not be able to impose tariffs like this. He would have to rely on other legal authorities that require him to carry out investigations, or meet other standards."
Earth to Donnie: This is not what tariffs are for.
Mr. Nick,
Again, I'm "working," and I do not have time to research this myself. TER is the first place that I'm hearing this. You're kidding, right? This can't be true!!!
Love,
Katie
My post was a direct quote from The NY Times. Here's the BBC's coverage.
"World peace is at stake".... Only the US can "play this game"?
No!!!
You literally cannot make this stuff up!
(sarcasm) Since Tariffs are working so well with our enemies, let's threaten our allies with them. (end sarcasm)
So what is THIS going to raise the price of? Fuck!!! Well, I guess we're back to more nastiness on cam...
Try and follow the demented "logic" behind the latest Trump tantrum. He is apparently willing to toss NATO in the dumpster over his Non-Nobel. Someone please give him a lolly.
From the Times: "President Trump is now claiming that one reason he is pushing to acquire Greenland is that he didnât win the Nobel Peace Prize, according to a message he sent to Norwayâs prime minister over the weekend.
Jonas Gahr Store, Norwayâs leader, received the text message on Sunday, three European officials familiar with the matter said on Monday.
âConsidering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America,â according to the message, which was first published by PBS.
In the message, Mr. Trump also questioned Denmarkâs claim to Greenland, saying, âThere are no written documents,â and adding, âThe World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you!â
Greenland has been part of the Danish Kingdom for more than 300 years, and world leaders have condemned Mr. Trumpâs insistence that the United States take over the territory, a giant icebound island in the Arctic region.
Mr. Store said in a statement that Mr. Trumpâs text message was a response to a message that Mr. Store sent to Mr. Trump on Sunday asking to speak to him about the crisis over Greenland and about Mr. Trumpâs threat of using tariffs to pressure Denmark into selling Greenland to the United States, which Denmark has refused to do.
âAs regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I have on several occasions clearly explained to Trump what is well known, namely that it is an independent Nobel Committee, and not the Norwegian government, that awards the prize,â Mr. Store said.
Mr. Trump has repeatedly challenged Denmarkâs claims to Greenland, but in decades-old agreements that the United States has signed with Denmark, the United States has explicitly recognized that Greenland is part of the Danish Kingdom."
POTUS is a narcissistic idiot. What a disgrace.
The Thais and Cambodians have broken their Trump-brokered truce twice.
The Israelis have kept killing Palestinians.
The Russians keep bombing Ukraine.
Various African civil wars have continued.
Trump has bombed Iran and has continued threatening more bombs as recently as last week.
Trump attacked Venezuela and violently removed its President, while expropriating its oil.
This clown doesn't deserve a Nobel and will NEVER get one. Unless someone gives him hers as a bribe.
He's a joke.
Denmark should agree to sell Greenland to the US for $1T.
Condition 1) Must be from taxpayer money.
Condition2) Trump must acknowledge this payment on a presidential address to the nation.
Otherwise no deal.
That's a good deal.
Anyways, the next president if a democrat will give Greenland back.
The Danes are smart people.
Don't you think if it was easy/economical to extract minerals and rare earths, they would have been it doing for decades.
Greenland might as well be on Mars.
It's a completely inhospitable environment, extremely difficult to set up a large scale mining operation.
Equipment will breakdown in the extreme cold, American people will hate being there. Unsustainable.
Uninvestable.
We're smarter and more motivated than the Danes. We're currently arguing about whether it's a good idea or not right now for deep sea mining...4-6 kilometers deep. If not for environmental interests, we'd already be doing it. We're within a decade of mining on the moon. The lack of infrastructure and arctic conditions will be challenges that will be met.
The people of Denmark are considered among the smartest, most educated in the world. So once again you have no idea of what you are talking about. Your optimism about deep-sea, arctic, and lunar mining is ill-advised but not surprising.
Deep sea mining by a Danish company, 1 mile deep but if you actually watch it, they say they will go up to 4X that depth. Try to avoid the rake next time, your face will thank you!
Copilot Search Branding
NASA Development of machines to build on Mars and the Moon | NextBigFuture.com
We are on the brink of lunar mining, with several missions planned for the next decade aimed at extracting resources like water, oxygen, and rare metals.
Current Status of Lunar Mining Efforts
Technological Advancements: The vision of mining on the Moon is becoming a reality, with various companies and space agencies developing technologies for resource extraction. For instance, NASA's Artemis program aims to establish a sustainable human presence on the Moon, which includes plans for mining operations by the early 2030s.
2
Upcoming Missions: Several missions are set to explore and potentially mine lunar resources. For example, NASA's VIPER rover, scheduled for launch in 2026, will search for water ice and test extraction methods. Additionally, private companies like Astrobotic and Intuitive Machines are working on landers and rovers designed for surface analysis and resource extraction.
2
Resources of Interest: The Moon is believed to contain valuable resources, including water ice, which can be converted into hydrogen and oxygen for fuel, and helium-3, a potential fuel for future fusion reactors. Other materials like rare earth elements and metals such as iron and titanium are also of interest.
2
4 Sources
Timeline for Mining Operations
Initial Trials: NASA hopes to begin mining trials by 2032, focusing on extracting lunar soil and other resources.
2
Commercial Scale: While initial efforts will likely be small-scale, the goal is to develop larger operations that could reshape the global economy and support deeper space exploration, including missions to Mars.
Now that you've got both feet in your mouth because of the deep sea and lunar mining capabilities now and soon to be...Arctic mining will require some infrastructure for certain but although colder than Alaska, it's pretty damn flat. Yes, a mile of ice before any minerals are touched but drilling through ice isn't a tough hurdle.
Good things being heard so far from Trumps meetings today, let's hope he's nailed down a deal that's good for the USA and keeps the commies out of there forever. As much as that would piss off you lefties, it's good for the country and good for us.
....IQ for the Danes on average is almost 2 full points below the USA. Now, imagine if we could exclude you and a couple hundred 1000 somalis, we'd probably be at 101, maybe 101.3??
Denmark has an advanced high-income economy, high standard of living, with a progressive, egalitarian, liberal culture. No wonder you are trashing Denmark. And on the subject of American intelligence, can you image how much smarter the U.S. would be without dumb ass MAGA morons.
I'm not going to spend the 10 minutes it took to find the links blowing your reply out of the water when you tried to say my post was inaccurate and that the Dane's were smarter than us. These were things I already knew but wanted to bring the proof for you to absorb and understand why you were laying on your back wondering what happened.
I will also tell you that until the last decade or two, Denmark was a homogeneous society that had one language with very little immigration and those that did, efficiently assimilated into the local culture, got jobs and became productive members of society. Your position is just like those gaslighting by saying the scandi model of democratic socialism is a viable option. It was great, right up to the invasion of parasitic immigrants. It's a different day now and much of Europe is about to begin it's death spiral. This is all the argument one needs to make the claim that Greenland must be under the control of the USA.
Actually what I said was that the Danes were among the smartest and most educated people in the world. I stand by that statement. "Parasitic immigrants" , "death spiral", "this is all the argument one needs to make the claim that Greenland must be under the control of the USA", huh. That tells me all I need to know about your xenophobia, racism, hate, and imperialism.
The statistics don't lie. Across the developed west, they are a net drain in each and every country. Parasitic is quite accurate.
Also right out of the xenophobic, racist, and fascist playbook. That's who you are. Be honest with yourself.
When you've run out of argument, call them fascists...
Better luck next time jizzo
Liberals being liberals. Don't like facts. How is it racist when it is facts. Somalian IQ...facts. what is happening where Islamic migration is happening and they are "taking over" and not assimilating. Again all facts.
Melting pots are good....but people need to assimilate and not keep tribalism. This goes for all races.
I will stop describing you in those terms when you stop posting like a racist, a fascist, or xenophobic.
...when they become aware that their arguments are dog shit.
Yep....call names, move goal posts, etc.
They deny facts. I guess they don't see what is happening in the UK, France, etc. where certain groups are not assimilating and driving changes.....or the crime stats.
But yeah...... Again. Melting pots are great for society. But again that means people assimilate and don't keep the tribalism. They adapt to the new environment and assimilate. But also introducing new ideas and culture. Don't reject the ideals or norms of the place they moved too. Accept the new area, learn, and also interject your ideas. Melt together all ideas. But these liberals here think that is partisan and racist to say this. They don't see how some groups reject and won't assimilate. Facts are facts but be blind to facts.
It normal for immigrants to group together while they try to assimilate. That process can take generations. That's what's happened over the course of American history with immigrants like the Italians, the Irish, etc. What doesn't help immigrants assimilate is when right-wing extremists demonize them and call them "illegal aliens", "parasites" and "garbage".
Correct they can.....but they assimilate. Look at UK, France, Italy, and in the USA. Where they are not. Dearborn MI...... Yeah....keep ignoring facts. In MSP Somalian gangs have pushed out the majority of other street gangs..... Is that assimilating....that is taking over. Yeah I am talking about illegal activity but it is the truth and happening. But don't let facts ruin your bullshit perspective.
a coherent English paragraph.
Liberal being a liberal.,...can only throw insults and not talk about subject.
Keep proving my point.
I love watching you endlessly repeat your mantra about liberals, exposing yourself again and again as totally lacking any originality or new thoughts.
So thanks for that.
You think it triggers me .... Not even close. It just proves your a stereotype.
Can't argue the points. So please keep it up. I live exposing liberals for that nonsense. It is helping to wake up the country to the lies and bullshit.
You live in a delusional fantasy and you are too ignorant to realize it.
Linked to a good article making the case for the acquisition, and debunking some of the Never Trump criticsâ most absurd objections.
This framing is comfortable. And almost surely wrong.
It goes like this: Signal acquisition. Denmark scoffs. Mention force. Denmark recoils. Insist on force, loudly, repeatedly. Denmark reaches peak indignation. Others come to their side. Then pivot. A purchase offer that eliminates Denmark's entire national debt ($142B) and nearly doubles Greenland's GDP (~$450B)...
And suddenly the question is no longer "how dare you" but "wait, how much?"
The force rhetoric was never the plan. It was the anchor. Denmark is no longer defending sovereignty against an imperial aggressor; Denmark is evaluating a financial proposition. The frame has moved.