Politics and Religion

Trump: "ISIS is honoring President Obama...He’s the founder of ISIS...
BigPapasan 3 Reviews 596 reads
posted
1 / 22

...He founded ISIS...I would say the co-founder would be ‘Crooked’ Hillary Clinton."

Righties excoriate Laffy for his hyperbole but never say anything about Trump's exaggeration.  Here's your chance to say something about Laffy's brother from another mother.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/291060-trump-obama-founded-isi

brooks5 91 reads
posted
2 / 22

and Obama CREATED, all by his lonesome, the "migrant (muslim rapist) migration" into Europe with his famous Syrian "pink (red) line" puss-out AND subsequently allowing Vladimir to bitch slap him and slaughter our trained "moderate" fighters.

Trump is a blowhard, but he's more right than wrong on this one.

try to pay fucking attention



-- Modified on 8/10/2016 10:09:39 PM

Nnoway 13 Reviews 78 reads
posted
3 / 22

I don't know if "founded" is the right word here but Obama sure facilitated the growth of ISIS  probably more then any other politician on earth.  

I mean not that Obama ever intended to do it. He didn't set out "to grow ISIS" but whatever he did and even whatever he still does serves to make ISIS the glorious cause for the impressionable Muslim youth to join.  

Can't be a little bit pregnant, can't you now Barry :) It's hard to take a clear position, make it clear what side you're on and follow through with it come what's may. Barring that though nobody's ever gonna take you seriously. No matter how large of a tank you ride

bigguy30 87 reads
posted
4 / 22

So only a clueless fool will make a statement like this and those who agree are even dumber.
It just shows Trump and his GOP supporter.
Just don't know or really care about history or the truth at all!

Posted By: Nnoway
I don't know if "founded" is the right word here but Obama sure facilitated the growth of ISIS  probably more then any other politician on earth.  
   
 I mean not that Obama ever intended to do it. He didn't set out "to grow ISIS" but whatever he did and even whatever he still does serves to make ISIS the glorious cause for the impressionable Muslim youth to join.  
   
 Can't be a little bit pregnant, can't you now Barry :) It's hard to take a clear position, make it clear what side you're on and follow through with it come what's may. Barring that though nobody's ever gonna take you seriously. No matter how large of a tank you ride.  
   
 

Nnoway 13 Reviews 68 reads
posted
6 / 22

...but not because American people believe that Obama didn't start ISIS or that the Clintons' people are incapable of arranging a murder.  

I still want the Clintons back though. The country was great after they got in the first time around and went into fucking spin the minute they left town, even a bit before I think in anticipation of them skipping town.  
The way I look at it is if you're afraid to go the distance to get yourself places what in the fuck are you doing running for president in the first place then?!

Ask yourself this question: Do we really want a highly moral goody-2-shoes in that position? I know I don't. If your goal doesn't justify the means for yourself, how can you expect for a person to put interests of the country in front of your own conscious, squeamishness and sensitivities when the shit hits the fan?  
Life is full of choices, most of which ask you to choose between two piles of shit for you to jump into. You got to be able to pick the smaller one and ideally be able to sacrifice your moral values for the sake of your country's interest. If not, you should just go and live normal life.

charlie445 3 Reviews 71 reads
posted
7 / 22

Obama created a name for them. Clinton mismanaged the terrorism franchise to some extent but as far as the running dogs of capitalism are concerned, everything is going as planned.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 57 reads
posted
8 / 22
bigguy30 67 reads
posted
9 / 22

When his statements were fact checked.

Posted By: Nnoway
...but not because American people believe that Obama didn't start ISIS or that the Clintons' people are incapable of arranging a murder.  
   
 I still want the Clintons back though. The country was great after they got in the first time around and went into fucking spin the minute they left town, even a bit before I think in anticipation of them skipping town.  
 The way I look at it is if you're afraid to go the distance to get yourself places what in the fuck are you doing running for president in the first place then?!  
   
 Ask yourself this question: Do we really want a highly moral goody-2-shoes in that position? I know I don't. If your goal doesn't justify the means for yourself, how can you expect for a person to put interests of the country in front of your own conscious, squeamishness and sensitivities when the shit hits the fan?  
 Life is full of choices, most of which ask you to choose between two piles of shit for you to jump into. You got to be able to pick the smaller one and ideally be able to sacrifice your moral values for the sake of your country's interest. If not, you should just go and live normal life.

Nnoway 13 Reviews 78 reads
posted
10 / 22

and a bit of education to boot too.  

Your fact checkers are idiots! Nobody says that Obama "supported" ISIS. Obama's policies facilitated their growth. There is a world of difference between the two notions. One doesn't need to be a Right winger to see that. There is no place in the world where people don't feel that way except of Obama devotees in America.

brooks5 53 reads
posted
11 / 22
brooks5 64 reads
posted
12 / 22

please enlighten us

is is some huge, secret conspiracy?  by who?  who are the puppet-masters?

this is the first that I have heard this theory stated so directly

would socialism or communism be better?  dictatorship and why?

bigguy30 68 reads
posted
13 / 22

It's time for a good laugh this morning.
 

Posted By: brooks5
please enlighten us  
   
 is is some huge, secret conspiracy?  by who?  who are the puppet-masters?  
   
 this is the first that I have heard this theory stated so directly  
   
 would socialism or communism be better?  dictatorship and why?

brooks5 91 reads
posted
14 / 22
bigguy30 92 reads
posted
15 / 22

So the President asked for it and why did Congress do nothing as usual?

Also let's get this straight, these are not my fact checkers.
You should like a Trump supporter.
When they don't want to hear the truth.

I will provide some more facts for your ass.
Posted By: Nnoway
and a bit of education to boot too.  
   
 Your fact checkers are idiots! Nobody says that Obama "supported" ISIS. Obama's policies facilitated their growth. There is a world of difference between the two notions. One doesn't need to be a Right winger to see that. There is no place in the world where people don't feel that way except of Obama devotees in America.

bigguy30 76 reads
posted
16 / 22

Posted By: brooks5


-- Modified on 8/11/2016 10:34:48 AM

bigguy30 79 reads
posted
17 / 22

I just wonder sometimes if people ever listen to themselves.

Posted By: Nnoway
and a bit of education to boot too.  
   
 Your fact checkers are idiots! Nobody says that Obama "supported" ISIS. Obama's policies facilitated their growth. There is a world of difference between the two notions. One doesn't need to be a Right winger to see that. There is no place in the world where people don't feel that way except of Obama devotees in America.

followme 68 reads
posted
18 / 22

That obama is a total fuckup as president but is great at lying.

 
You're welcome  
In Plagiarist30 We Distrust

JakeFromStateFarm 104 reads
posted
19 / 22

This guy has the attention span of a gerbil and can't stay on message no matter what.  For Hillary, he's the gift that keeps on giving.  He thinks because his ditto heads cheer loudly, the rest of the electorate is eating it up, when actually they are deserting him in droves.
Then he also brought up his "if I lose I'll just take a nice long vacay."  I'm sure his acolytes ate that up, too.  Worst candidate ever.

bigguy30 104 reads
posted
20 / 22

I will say it again Trump and his supporters like FM, GaG, DD Jack and others.
Just need to make things up because they have nothing. Lol

Posted By: followme
That obama is a total fuckup as president but is great at lying.  
   
   
 You're welcome  
 In Plagiarist30 We Distrust

Nnoway 13 Reviews 51 reads
posted
21 / 22

I'm not a Trump supporter. I know it would be so much easier to put me in the narrow tunnel where you apparently are but it ain't happening brother.  

I'm Hillary supporter and beforehand (surprise surprise) Kasich supporter. I like to hire only those who have at least a general idea what the fuck they're doing. No Trumps and no Bernies for this monger although I do appreciate some things that both of them are saying (Trump more as to foreign policy and Bernie as to domestic) and realize that establishment politicians would never approach things from that angle. But there is no perfect world out there and I need a plumber who first of all knows how to fix my toilet.  

As for your example, if Pravda was an official mouthpiece of Communist Party of USSR and Xinhua still does the same for China, there is nothing closer to Obama's government official mouthpiece in America then Huffington Post. Not even MSNBC. It's the same as to say: "according to Fox News "Bush rules!" " Duh.  

That being said, the reason Congress can't declare war on ISIS is because ISIS is not a state. It's an organization that wants to be a state. Remember ISIS want to establish a caliphate, i.e. an Islamic monarchy under the rule of caliph (i.e. the king) - that's a state. If US Congress were to declare war on ISIS it would be an equivalent of recognizing ISIS as a state.  

Believe me ISIS would love for the US Congress to declare a war on it! Are you kidding?! Talking about "David against Goliath"! You'd have a flood of impressionable young crazies flocking to defend the "poor little caliphate" against the "humongous evil empire"! If that's what you're looking for then let's have US Congress declare war on ISIS.

Nnoway 13 Reviews 84 reads
posted
22 / 22

I said that Obama facilitated the growth of terrorism. Which is probably much worse then just "being weak".  

Moreover I don't think Obama was weak at all. I consider Obama to be one savvy and decisive brother. It's just that throughout his presidency he was too susceptible to Republican influence in regards to his foreign policy which made his foreign policy incredibly inconsistent.  

For example, he got out of Iraq and went into Libya which confused the living shit out of everybody. You either stay in Iraq and bomb the living shit out of Libya or get out of Iraq (and maybe Afghanistan too) and don't get involved in Libya. Or... Obama declares to the whole world that he's gonna bomb Syria to smithereens, even puts his ships in position to do exactly that, then suddenly turns around and runs as though Assad (who?) chased him away.  

You either project total punishment to anybody who rubs you the wrong way or be reserved with your actions. In both cases you can still appear tough. It's just when you appear like you talk piece and then freak out, and/or do a war but not really, i.e. trying to be on both sides of one conflict (like what Obama did throughout his presidency), that's when you really fuck up everything because nobody really knows how to act with you in order to keep you happy and whether you're their friend or somebody to be afraid of.

All that in addition to allowing his personal relationships with world leaders interfere with his foreign policy decisions which often lead to easily avoidable conflicts (Hello Ukraine!).  

Obama's foreign policy sucked throughout his presidency. Maybe no less then Bush's did. The last president who had his senses together in foreign affairs was "the sleek", that's why after seeing the last two imbeciles in action I want Billy's wife in there. If I can't have Bubba himself being front and center, I still want him back there even if it's leading from behind.  

Moreover, I'm sure there'd be another intern or two all too ready to be led from behind as well, which could only make a man better president even if "from behind". Btw, that was something that I always though that G.W. was missing big time!  

Whether you liked "the sleek" or not you still can't disagree much here without showing yourself a mighty hypocrite because that's why you're on TER in the first place! Not having enough pussy in man's life makes a man all pissed off and jumpy and causes him to be impulsive and to lash out (see G.W. or his dad for that matter, both I suspect weren't getting enough beef).  
Look at Ronnie on the other hand, eh?! Married from what I understand a chick who back in the day  had a reputation for giving the best head in Hollywood! The result: the economy was doing great, the wall came down, and no major wars to talk about.  

So to summarize: Clinton - a lot of pussy of varied quality and quantity -> no major problems in  
                                        the country.  
                           Ronnie - a wife who by all accounts was a great lay -> no major problems in the  
                                        country
                           H.W. - something always felt like there were some issues there in that department  
                                     -> economy sucked, how many wars did he get himself involved in his 4  
                                         years there? At least 3 I could think of right off the bat.  
                           W. - oh don't get me started on this one. Laura Bush should've brought her
                                 husband some whores if she couldn't do it herself -> whatever he could fuck  
                                 up, he sure fucked it up!  
                           Barry - a special case here. I don't think that Barry's reasons for being a  generally
                                      fucked up president had anything to do with not getting enough pussy.  

Other then that I rest my case.

-- Modified on 8/11/2016 5:01:50 PM

Register Now!