Politics and Religion

OMG!! Kamala is now running against Joe Biden!!!
lester_prairie 12 Reviews 205 reads
posted
1 / 17

Kamala says prices are too damn high and she will reduce prices on day one!  This is a stark repudiation of Biden economic policies -- policies she helped enact with he tie breaking Senate votes.
.
If she could do it on day one Biden/Harris could do it today. She's really knifing Biden in the back now. Et tu Brutes?

inicky46 61 Reviews 37 reads
posted
2 / 17

Is Fester even dimly aware that BIDEN has said prices are still too high?
Poor Fester is losing it..
Oh, wait....Fester never had it.
Ever.
Fester has cracked under pressure.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 36 reads
posted
3 / 17

…Biden wants to get back into the race. Who knows if that’s bullshit or not.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 30 reads
posted
4 / 17

Maybe he forgets he's out of the race.

impposter 49 Reviews 44 reads
posted
5 / 17

"Somebody told me ..." "Everybody knows ..." "A famous general -- you know who he is but I won't name him -- told me ..." and now "I saw a few people saying ..."
.
You SAW people saying? You didn't HEAR people saying? Who are these people? Are you a lip reader? (I know your answer: 'Yes, I am a lip reader and they clearly said that Biden is getting back into the race. They were "a few people" on line at the liquor store.")

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: I saw a few people saying…
…Biden wants to get back into the race. Who knows if that’s bullshit or not.

inicky46 61 Reviews 31 reads
posted
6 / 17

"I read it somewhere." "I forget where I heard this." "I didn't actually read the article, but..."
Then he puts up a bogus "fact" with no link and expects to be taken seriously.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 35 reads
posted
7 / 17

…on X. Both are conservative, both of whom I don’t consider particularly trustworthy. I didn’t post a link because I didn’t want to endorse the claim as true. However, it is worthy I think to look into and investigate further. Whether you lazy fucks would bother is probably asking too much. But I kinda hoped the lefties here would look into it because you guys would look for sources that I wouldn’t think of.  

 
The claim, as far as I can ascertain, is that Biden wants to get back into the race and use Dem convention rules to force the issue. I would have thought that ship had sailed, but the claim is that it’s legally possible.  

 
I suspect this just bullshit, but I have no idea if that’s the case.

cks175 44 Reviews 30 reads
posted
9 / 17
lester_prairie 12 Reviews 36 reads
posted
10 / 17

It's plausible that Biden might think this, he is demented after all, but the delegates have already voted for Kamala. Even if Biden was sane and healthy what rules could he invoke to undue what has been?

impposter 49 Reviews 46 reads
posted
11 / 17

My VPN blocks X with a warning of malware. I was never a twitter user anyway.
.
YOU ARE REPEATING THE UNPROVEN (and usually false) MISINFORMATION RANTINGS OF TRUMP.  
.
No matter how many people re-tweet or re-package or re-post Trump's grievances, it doesn't make them true.

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: I saw it from a couple different sources…
…on X. ...
Trump claims that the replacement of Biden as the Dem nominee for POTUS VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION. Is Trump's claim [ ]True or [X]False? It is a lie! It is MISINFORMATION!  The claim has been debunked by lawyers and others REPEATEDLY yet Trump is still promoting THE LIE as of today (10 August 2024)!  
.
http://www.ksn.com/news/trump-stokes-fears-with-unconstitutional-harris-talk/
Trump stokes fears with ‘unconstitutional’ Harris talk [August 10, 2024]
.
"Former President Trump is setting off alarms among critics as he pushes the claim that Vice President Harris’s ascent to become the Democratic nominee is somehow unconstitutional, with some warning he could be laying the groundwork to contest an electoral defeat as he did in 2020. Trump has repeatedly sought to cast Harris replacing President Biden as the Democratic nominee as nefarious, likening it to a “coup” and in recent days claiming it may be unconstitutional because she was not atop the ballot in the primary process. ..."

cks175 44 Reviews 35 reads
posted
12 / 17

If your VPN is telling you that your connection to X is unsafe, then your VPN is set up wrong. To circumvent the block though, just access X through their app (Available from either the Apple Store or Google Play).

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 40 reads
posted
13 / 17

Even if you hate Elon, X is really becoming the only way to keep up with news. And not just US news but news around the world. And it does a pretty good job was keeping you out of an echo chamber if you follow people from both sides of the aisle.  You lefties seem to usually be a day or two behind the rest of us.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 29 reads
posted
14 / 17

Correct, you can follow anyone you like on X.  It's not just MAGA.  Plenty of communists on there for all the progressives to follow.

inicky46 61 Reviews 35 reads
posted
15 / 17

There were no political parties when the Constitution was written and none when the first Presidents were elected. There is no mention of political parties or their nominating processes in the Constitution.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 28 reads
posted
16 / 17

Even before the Constitution was ratified, there were federalists like Hamilton and anti-federalists like Jefferson. By the time Jefferson came into office there was a Democrat-Republican party which is the Democrat party today. In Jefferson’s day the Democrats were of a populist bent, and even more so under Andrew Jackson.

inicky46 61 Reviews 30 reads
posted
17 / 17

'The point (which was obvious to everyone but Wanker) was that unlike what Trump claimed, there is no Constitutional requirement to nominate a President at the convention of a political party. The first political convention wasn't until 1831.

Register Now!