is WE KEEP WINNING?!?!?!
When you're side can actually learn how to win an election, then start preaching, until then, go try to work out your own problems, we seem to be the ones in power LOL 
How about from false premises?
First, the notion that the President elected by a majority of Americans is a conservative "extremist." Then, let's discuss the notion that anything conservatives do is "ideological," whereas anything Liberals and/or Democrats and/or Socialists do is not "ideological." Talk about polarization! Defining as "extreme" a position on infanticide/abortion that was the law in this country, and before it, English common law, for centuries. Defining as "extreme" a position on race relations (what you're referring to is somewhat mysterious) that has its roots in Martin Luther King, Jr.'s admonition that people should be judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Defining as "extreme" market-based answers to environmental problems which also respect constitutionally-protected property rights. Defining as "extreme" a tax policy premised in the notion that what you earn is yours first, not merely what the Imperial Federal Government allows you to keep. Defining as a foreign policy what is --- as they define it --- holding American interests as primary and not lodging a veto in the UN, or Paris, or Berlin (and, of course, misrepresenting it as a "go-it-alone" foreign policy simply because the allies we have are not the ones to whom the far Left renders homage).
And then, of course, there's the insanity of suggesting that the far Left should define "traditional Republican principles." I'm no more interested than listening to how a far Leftie should tell the GOP how to be successful (an end the far Leftie does not desire) than the Deanocrats should be listening to Pat Buchanan, or Tom Delay, or Bob Novak.
And "negative campaigns"?!?!?! Chris Rock was right about one thing. GWB deserves credit for being able to win notwithstanding the hate campaign being run against him (witness the rhetoric in the post to which I respond), including Michael Moore's slanderous and lying film in theatres nationwide.
"Marginalizing women"? Like Condi Rice? Elaine Chao? Like women in the Independent Women's Forum? Women like them? Is that to whom you are referring? Or are you referring to the truly marginal, like the nags in NOW, or the radical abortionists in NARAL and Planned Parenthood, a minority among women, and those others who pursue a crypto-Socialist agenda? Yeah, the GOP does marginalize them. And rightly so.
And BTW, the GOP does enjoy a "true majority." In case you didn't notice, Republican candidates won the Presidency (with more votes than even the great Ronaldus Magnus), a majority of the House, and a majority of the Senate.
