This is not an accurate post

I have seen Randi several times and posted a review.  She is a great provider and is very into it.  Most of her reviews I believe are accurate.  I don't know what your motivation is for this slam on her but it is not very nice.  Post a review if you didn't like something, but slamming her with no other info here isn't right.

1 your using an alias. when accusing someone (no matter how incomprehensibly) of something an alias really shouldnt be used. stand on your reputation and let it prosper or suffer as the situation deserves.
2 you write like a demented monkey and your post made no sense what so ever at least to me.

1) If you feel that she is substantially understaing her age, write that in your review. Some of her reviews make similar statements.

In general, I always read a provider's listed age with several grains of salt.

"18-21" => 22-25
"22-25" => 26-33
"26-30" => mid-late 30's
"31-35" => early 40's.
"late 30's" => mid-late 40's.
"early 40's" => 50's
"legendary" => 60's

There are some exceptional ladies who tell the truth. But being a gentleman their names shall remain secret.

2)  Most hobbyists try to carefully check providers by reading every review on them and looking at every picture they can find before making a booking.  Did you do that?

3) If on meeting her you felt that she was that unattractive and had deceived you with misleading photographs, you could have walked away before handing over your money. That may be rude, but if she really was pulling scam then it may be justified.

4) Accept that in this hobby you will have some poor experiences. It is a bit like gambling.  The nights you lose make the nights you win so much better. (That's why they call her Lady Luck.)

thus far are absolutely hilarious. It certainly makes "Mr. or Ms. ALIAS" look stupid. I love laughing...
so thank you for your wonderful retorts to this absurd post!!!  
Cheyenna