Sorry to use an alias, but we have a provider name change simply for the purpose of avoiding a poor review history. The first review under her new name Stella was excellent, of course it now appears to be a fake, and the second review shows she's up to her old tricks. Stella #186235 used to be Brandee # 169583. I submitted a problem report to merge the two names, not sure how long it will take TER to take action, so I figured I'd post on the board as well, so hobbyists will not be dupped before TER makes the changed.  However, she recently received a bad review under her new name.

could not remember former name or names. Did find it funny that her new review good where as the prior reviews were so so at best.  Good catch!

Of course, I can't come out and speculate WHO YOU ARE, Mr' Alias, because if I was correct, I would be moderated for "outing an alias."

However, there is something not right here:

You are using an alias which is completely unneeded. Why would you do that?

What needs to be said is that there is a guy who submitted TWO reviews for the same visit with this provider and is trying to ruin her reputation beyond his one bad review.

DID YOU NOTICE THAT, Mr. Good Samaritan Alias?

Maybe you didn't, so let me address your post, now that I have looked into the reviews, etc.


* You said "The first review under her new name Stella was excellent, of course it now appears to be a fake"  

My response: NO, the first review under her new name is horrible.  

Go to the "second review" that is excellent. Look at that reviewers history you will see he has other reviews. It may have been a while since he wrote one, but it IS a hobbyist who wrote it and it is legit.

So maybe you just got the order mixed up. Yes???  I think there is more to that, buddy.

* You said "and the second review shows she's up to her old tricks...  However, she recently received a bad review under her new name. "

My response: The bad review under STELLA appears to be her FIRST review -- due to the date.

However, If someone submitted that bad review AFTER discovering "Stella" and reasding the good one (which IS LEGIT) then THAT PERSON WOULD KNOW IT WAS SUBMITTED AFTER, and therefore might make the stupis mistake of calling it "her second review."

So maybe you had been watching THAT closely?

Anyone can go back and forth between Brandee and Stella and see that there is ONE HOBBYIST who gave a bad review for both.

Sep 2011   Stella Phoenix 3 - Homely 2 - I should have stayed home
Jul 2011   Brandee Phoenix 2 - Ugly 2 - I should have stayed home

But that ONE HOBBYIST made some mistakes.  He SAYS he only say her ONCE, yet his reviews contadict one another.  Different months. One says CBJ. the other says BBBJ.

It's clear that THAT hobbyist is cyber-tracking this provider and making it his business to trash her because of a bad experience.

OR.... maybe this psycho NEVER EVEN SAW HER. Maybe she turned him away and changed her name to try to move on.

Any man who does what that ONE HOBBYIST did is fucked in the head and should be pimp-slapped from here to the Mexico border.

Now again, I don't know WHO YOU are, Mr. Good Samaritan Alias, but I know I am going to point out to TER that ONE HOPBBYIST has obviously put up "fake" reviews and ask them to fix that. I've heard you get banned for doing that.

However, if you happen to be that ONE HOBBYIST, I would ask our moderator to flip your alias.

Either way i think the ladies on the board should go and take a look at who that ONE HOBBYIST is, because they may want to avoid a client who is willing to go on a vendetta.

But I could be wrong about all that stuff.


HH

Awesome job at picking this one out! We "hobbyists" need to help each other. Maybe the "ripoff" and "cash and dash" providers will stop making Phoenix their home.

If they write a fake review they need to at least make it a bit realistic.   This one was over the top and an insult to the intelligence of the average javelena.

was that this was posted by a provider who discovered the inconsistency and didn't want to look catty by bringing it to others attention.   Maybe it's not the reviewer who posted the bad review that posted this but wrote two reviews of the same session?  He did write under Stella's review that her name was Brandee when he saw her.

The first review posted was the good one, i saw it before the other one was listed. You have a few weeks to write a review the way I remember the rules.  Also the lady has two or more names, I know for a fact she has two. If I could have remembered the other name I would have reported to TER myself. Why did he us a alias maybe, because of rants like this. Is he a stalker, I don't know but I thinking your assuming a bit to much. Bottom line the two names should be linked. This is not ment to be personal, just want to speak up for what I saw.

-- Modified on 11/26/2011 6:36:34 PM

Yes, I could be wrong. If it turns out that way I'll admit that as well. But so far I'm batting 1000 on the ones I've called out on this and other boards.

I did a post recently about ladies using two names. Did you read it? The local ladies said that was to be expected for many reasons. So a name change is not an indictment.

Did you bother to go and read the reviews posted by the guy I call ONE HOBBYIST? You can see that person is being sheisty, and had been following the gal to try to beat her to death with a bad review.

If you have a bad experience, you write a proper review and move on. Or just move on. If you don't move on, you're a fucking mental case in my (and many other's) book.

I stand by the facts I posted. They are correct.

I stand by my speculation too, because, well... it's SPECULATION, a guess, an estimation, etc. It can be proved wrong. So, please, DO THAT FOR ME!

To alert a board to a ROB or rip off is good.

To do more than the standard warning for some sort of "hobby justice" is just pathetic and more than a little creepy. Moreover, to do THAT under an alias shows the person knows it and is afraid. Even more creepy.

If you don't agree, that's cool. You don't have to.

I say the OP is a bit off. I've been around a long time, and I've done this sort of thing in my career, so you'll excuse me if I remain confident until proven otherwise.


HH

The earlier review, done by tadaimaybe on Brandee before the her name change has been deleted by TER admin. They chose to ignore the discrepancies and "solve" the issue in that way.

That IS their call.


HH

I am neither a stalker nor escort.  Stella/Brandee now has 6 reviews, 3 good reviews and 3, lets just say weak reviews. What no one seemed to address are the two weak reviews given in May and July by "veteran" hobbyists after the first two good reviews. The true story will unfold over time.  

Check out  the new review! Now what's your opinion of the situation.

She's changed her name (and phone number) again