continued---
Noon - returned to County Attorney office where nice lunch provided and discussion of various crimes. Arizona and Maricopa county is enjoying a 50 year low in crime rates due largely to the older population that is less likely to commit crimes and a huge decline in vehicle thefts with modern car technology making cars harder to steal (if locked).
1 PM - Met with heads of forensic team that also prepares trial exhibits in their lab in the basement. Very interesting how to recreate 3D images of crime scenes showing examples from cases. One had an art/graphics background and the other medical working at a cranial center etc. Walked us thru the case of a young girl killed and years later found part of her skull in the desert. DNA led to suspect but claimed died of accident and just illegally disposed of the body in the desert a minor crime compared to murder. The defense argues fractures in the skull were postmortem (after death) but were proven wrong that with how the fractures fanned out was from a "wet brain" (living) blow.
Forensics also does 3D printing making models of knives and guns used in crimes since the real weapon cannot be in court to examine other than thru a sealed evidence bag (so no one can grab it and attack someone in the court).
2 PM - The entire MCAO "cold case" unit met with us (only 2 and another detective). They get referrals from various police agencies often when a lead investigator retires or run out of leads - no witness or investigators still alive from old cases etc. They are working about 50 cold cases now. New DNA technology has often lead to new arrests. As I recall they had opened and closed about 20 cases in the last year or so, with seven convictions from old cold cases.
They walked through in detail one case of a girl who was beaten by parents, put in a cage, barely fed, starved to death and was left in the desert in 1997. Family members knew about it and a Mexican nanny but when the husband went to prison on drug charges they thought police knew about the murder. Long, sad story. The girl was "not theirs" because resulted from a MCSO deputy who had connections with a drug cartel. The family didn't consider the girl-murder/ The two cold case investigators in the article is who met with us.
3 PM - Long time deputy county attorney discussed in great detail with us participating after giving an extensive "incident review" report of what could be charged with 2nd-degree murder, manslaughter or self-defense related to a road rage incident. The study had the police report, crime pictures, etc. He had us recreate the scene from the report. The younger Pakistan gal was the car driver. Very comprehensive analysis step by step of arguments of different charges or self-defense.
This is an example of what the county attorney's do when trying to decide how to charge a case of not when it is not clear. They would get 12 attorneys and have the case presented and discussed the evidence for different charges. See later Montgomery also discussed with me since I was only 2 of 12 that voted for self-defense. I commented to the attorney that you wouldn't want me on your jury. He said "I have HAD you on my juries too many times," jokingly.
4 PM - Lots of discussion with Maricopa County Attorney Montgomery.
While I disagree with most of his conservative politics, he is very sharp, and we had a great interaction with him for about an hour answering and discussing many questions and concerns. I would have wanted to discuss with him the "pretend victim" issues and going after "morality crimes" and long prison sentences and abuse of "Donald Advisements" with 40 years in prison potential to scare the 38 in the Goddess case to take pleas. The leader didn't plead and got 4.5 yrs in prison, for non-drug, private consenting adult with no victims, longer than many violent assault cases, but I refrained!
Someone asked how he would have charged the case we just studied. He asked how we voted and got into a discussion with me since I was only 2 of 12 that voted for not charging based on self-defense. He then asked me if he added two more facts to the case would I change my vote. I replied that would make self-defense harder to justify. Montgomery said this is the situation faced in recent cases, and yet he didn't charge even with the added facts for charging since he concluded it was not likely he could get a jury to convict. This supported by self-defense view!
He made the point many times that the police can charge based on probable cause, but his office has a much higher bar when deciding whether to charge or indict. Not only must there probably cause but also, the likelihood the prosecutor could win at a trial based on the evidence.
He also pointed out that 95% of those in prison are either convicted of violent crimes or repeat offenders. Tell that to all the sexworkers in prison for in private, consenting adult no victim, not drug-related crimes but the crime of sexual expression.
At the end, we had a group picture taken with Montgomery that was sent to all of us.
Conclusion- A very excellent long day with some very intelligent crime fighters even if disagree with certain laws related to sexwork.
The next dates are Oct19 and Nov 9th. Applications are due two weeks before the class dates. Information at https://www.maricopacountyattorney.org/232/Citizens-Academy