Boasting?

OK. To be statiscally significant, you two will need to first pollute yourelves. I'm told that fish, escargo and meat will do the trick. Say two weeks or so. I hear beer is also a pollutant.

You will then need to establish your baseline. The time of day is relevent for the next phase. To establish that baseline you probably need at least 5 samples - all in the same session.

Now, one of you changes their diet and the other continues the pollutants. Say, again, two weeks or so.

You then need to re-test and again 5 samples minimum. The re-test should be at the same time of day as the baseline.

So you two up for delivering 5 samples each? LOL

Reading back over this - I think you need a third control variable. Somebody would need to stop the pollutants but not start juice. In the name of science, I'll vounteer.

BTW, a cool friend once suggested (well, she insisted) that a can a day keeps the (her) grimace away. OK, she's too cool to insist and too good at what she does to actually grimace. But, I've also learned you have to moderate your intake. You can't drink 5 cans as a "catchup". It really messes with things..... think consistency of "honey" instead of "nector".

I think the results can be published in a journal. The article title? "What a hobbiest will do for the Ladies they see".