Did Glen take these pics?  If so, either his photography is improved, or this Goddess is exactly that....a Brunette Goddess!
Check out Brooke Banks on Phoenix 411...WOW!
Anyone seen her recently?

'scuse me, but unless my pixals are distorted, that's not a brunette.  Are you're contacts fogged up, Jeffrey?  Because there are also two seperate threads below discussing Brooke, whom I beleive has slightly altered her "name", email and info since a couple days ago.  Rather strange, IMO!   Oh, and what is the basis for her claim to be the highest rated provided since '03?

When her reviews were up she was top rated when certain parameters were used in the TER search function for reviews by average in Phoenix.   There was a controversy involving her on this board in Dec that ended up in a "he said she said"pissing match. (like all controversy here)   Her reviews are now gone. Her 411 add says "as I do not  want to kiss and tell" but her post in January said "I am working on having my reviews reinstated as soon as possible" Only Brooke  and staff know for sure. The third thread on her on this page alone, interesting for someone who has  as they say  been "delisted".
Your right, maybe Jeffery should have studied his brochures  "black onyx" is more accurate than brunette!

-- Modified on 2/28/2008 5:20:56 AM

and I quote:

"- Discussion of delisted providers/agencies is not allowed (except for rip-offs, ROBs, etc.)"

Hmmmmmmmmmm isn't that what is being done here AND thread below???????????

-- Modified on 2/28/2008 7:08:05 AM

Do I sense a little jealousy here? Perhaps delisted, but let her move on in peace. There MAY be two side to this story. However your point is noted.

There is all types of gals and guys.  We all have our own likes and dislikes.  More power to her for what she has done and continues to do.  But just trying to make sure WE ALL play by the same rules - that's all.  

There always is two sides to a story.  If she does get back on - great.  But again the TER POLICY states and again I quote:

- Discussion of delisted providers/agencies is not allowed (except for rip-offs, ROBs, etc.)


TER policy not mine.  

Have a great day - tomorrow is "extra" day - leap year.  Make good use out of it everyone.

-- Modified on 2/28/2008 12:15:42 PM

This is just meant as a joke but if you read it right it canbe taken honestly.  If you up upon an arguement, there ae three sides to every story:

Yours, Mine and the Truth!! Please don't shoot the messenger

All I did was ask a simple question (or, what I thought was a simple question).  I knew nothing about "delisting," and, in fact, I've never even met this ravishing beauty.  I didn't look for her reviews, because I knew they were quite good from when I saw them a few months ago, so I sure didn't know about any "delisting."
Those new pics made it pretty obvious that she has a new pair of enhanced twins, which I thought looked stunning in the photos.  So, I asked if anyone had seen her recently?  The funny thing is, my post seemed to unintentionally spark a little controversy (jealousy?), but no guys stepped up and answered my question.
I guess I just might have to step up and be in a position to answer my own question.  SOON!
I do apologize for any controversy or unwanted attention I may have brought into play here.  And, yeah, perhaps a spanking is in order LOL!

-- Modified on 2/28/2008 4:54:22 PM

stick to the blowjobs.

All I did was ask why something that appears to be an obvious violation of the board posting rules was being allowed.  Not jealous.  In fact, I even posted earlier that if she does get back on good for her.  There is enough for everyone.
So sorry if a honest woman stating facts is your idea of "jealousy" - it is NOT.

And as far as "stick to" - I can't help that I love what I do.  

Have a great weekend.  

-- Modified on 2/28/2008 9:28:14 PM

coward much?

grow a pair!

theres a lot to question about this brook lady.

delisting, disappearing reviews that are less than all tens.

outlandish claims on her site that dont seem to meet reported reality.

i have to look askance at these threads as well.

-- Modified on 2/28/2008 11:09:06 PM

providers on ter are NEVER jealous of those providers who are delisted.

sometimes we are perplexed as to why someone would promote them since they are most often delisted for fraud.

disrespecting ter policy to promote fraud makes you look untrustworthy.

just letting you know.  

-- Modified on 3/1/2008 3:27:34 PM

I have seen her again since the enhancements and they are incredible, as is she.  The two-sided issues on this dicussion board notwithstanding, I still think she is one of the best anywhere.

And that's from more than 20 years in the hobby.