How old is too old for a girls pics ?
Or does it matter if they still give
An accurate presentation of how she
Appears today ?

If the picture still looks like you, how long ago it was taken probably would never be noticed, right?  

If you do feel that it might be questionable, you could always add a disclaimer saying it's "x" years old, but you're still the same knockout as in the pic.  

I personally like current photos. They don't have to be professional shots. I think if they are a few months old it's OK, If they are current (with dates) it shows that there is no deception intended.

Just my .02

I'll admit when I look at pics and the date stamp, if there is one, shows 2008 or older I get a little nervous.
However, if the current reviews do not mention anything about inaccuracies or deceptions, then I'm usually good to go.
In a worse case scenario, I might pm the last reviewer or two, if I really have my doubts and inquiry about the pics.

If your pics are over 6-9 months old, get some new ones.  Everyone changes over time and you don't want to risk a comment in a review that pics are not accurate.  Plus I want to be reasonably sure of what is going to open the door when I get there.

Pics really don't need to be professional photo shoots and I'm totally OK with no face pics.  What I do need to see is full body shots preferably from a couple different angles.  If you hide your tummy behind a wrap or use clever photo angles to obscure we will assume there is a reason.  And I prefer a more mature lady that is more well-rounded!

Pictures should always be an accurate representation of the provider. I feel ladies should change out their old pics with new ones at least once a year, if, for no other reason, to keep things fresh and us guys interested.

People's appearances often change significantly from year to year.

Somewhat current is good. Don't have to monthly, two to 3 months old is fine.

it really doesnt matter when you took them.

the question on the review submission is whether or not they are accurate.

But I also love archive galleries too!

Especially if they are my favorite photos....

RocketMan

As Drumsticks suggested above, the actual question is "are they a fair representation of the provider?"  The response options are No, Yes, No Pics, Old and Really Old.  Clearly anything other than Yes (or No Pics) is a negative rating.  Strictly speaking, if they were taken years ago but the appearance (somehow) is  the same, then indeed it wouldn't "matter when you took them" as Ana/Jenna says, and the reviewer should respond Yes -- and also wouldn't know the actual age of the pics.  In practice, "Old" means changed to some degree for the worse, and "Really Old" means changed bigtime for the worse!  It's not literally about the age of the pics, but rather how apparent is the aging of their subject?  (Sorry, happens to all of us.)

An older pic is ok as you long as you still look like the pic.















HalfHour

Most of the ladies that I do photo shoots for seem to always come back or want new images every 6 months or so. A couple of them also want more often or for me to call them for shots for my books or calendars..

I think that every 6 months or so would be fine for about 90 % of you beautiful ladies.

but that's my opinion.

Majic.

But have a lovely day