I understand the stats are a part of this site. What I dont like is the interpretation of what number can I give or get away with giving! Every site has its rules for example
-minimum reviews before being allowed into contention is20.
-longevity of reviews is unlimited.
-the number of reviews is a non factor. Jordan Kay with 460ish is wow but someone in Orange County has over 600 reviews. Can I get a "Damn" with sheer numbers can you go wrong?
- it takes multiple bad reviews or ripoffs for the site to believe the hobbyists.
-one 5minute "Brazzers" or "Backroom Casting Couch" does not make a "porno or adult" star.
In the end, read reviews and make your selections wisely. I've noticed recently too many blowhards or pimps making inflating reviews for there ladies. It's getting more difficult to find a good compatable match for my vacation.
I don’t know Phoenix’ “Cameron” but what has happened with her 20th Review doesn’t seem fair to the other Ladies on the TER Top 100 Phoenix Provider List and certainly not fair to Taylor, the #1 Ranked Provider prior to today.
What happened was that Cameron’s 20th Review was posted Yesterday and it put her in second place in the TER Top 100 for Phoenix. Somehow a New Review has been Posted today and she still has only 20 Reviews, but is now Ranked #1 in Phoenix Top 100.
Is there manipulation of the TER Top 100 Phoenix Provider List going on here by someone? Certainly looks like it and doesn’t seem fair to the other Ladies who work so hard to be Ranked on TER.
Just sayin!
No manipulation taking place. It looks like one of the gents that submitted a recent review actually resubmitted an edited version that changed her performance from an 8 to a 10. This resulted in her TER ranking going from 9.5/9.4 to 9.5/9.55, which now puts her at number 1. Hobbyist do have the option to do this, but it has to be approved by the administrator. I actually wanted to submit another review of her since i have seen her a half dozen times. But Ter informed me that my new review would simply replace my old one and not count as a new one. So, i declined since the new one was also going to be a well deserved 10/10, thus cancelling out and merely replacing the old one. What i CAN say unequivocally about said provider is this: I KNEW after meeting and spending time with her that she was going to end up AT or near the top of the list once word got around. I can't really say much else without sounding like a shill. Just know that she is indescribable on SOOO many levels and her reviews speak for themselves.
This hobby isn't NASCAR.
The list is purely a starting point for research not an end in itself. The rating system , IMHO, does not cover the all important factors.....value, attitude, cleanliness to name a few. One of my ATFs is not even on the top 100, but then again she chooses to "drive" under the radar!!
-- Modified on 9/15/2012 2:43:55 PM
-- Modified on 9/15/2012 3:09:41 PM
Dude, it wasn't even IMPLIED that the list was anything BUT a starting point. After all, would'nt one have to actually READ the reviews to conclude whether a provider's stellar ratings are justified? And, would'nt it be expected that the ATF you mentioned would in fact be absent from the list if she is under the radar? Thank you Captain Obvious.
-- Modified on 9/15/2012 4:31:58 PM
" Rubbing is racing!!" ROFLMAO
-- Modified on 9/15/2012 4:21:34 PM
Rankings may NOT be important to us (they are NOT to me) but I am guessing that a Provider who has been knocked down by a “Bad Review” or lost position because of a “Bogus Review” may not feel the same as we Hobbyists about this subject. I am also guessing that none will comment on this thread because of fear of retaliation and if I were they, I wouldn’t comment either.
I also realize that we Hobbyists have a right to change our Reviews and I have taken advantage of that option on one occasion. I was certain to note in my New Review that this was indeed a “Re-review.” NOT the for this almost “Instant Re-review.”
Actually and as a correction, in addition to the First Review talking about “exchanging personal telephone numbers” and complaining that “now she won’t respond,” the Reviewer had given her an 8 & 9.
I don’t doubt simmonsse41 account of how fabulous this Provider is, not for a minute. I also can completely understand the Performance upgrade on a “recall.” However, she must have “painted up her lips and rolled and curled her tinted hair” (lol) to go from 8 to 10 in Appearance so quickly.
I am NOT accusing this otherwise reliable Reviewer of anything untoward. But the entire thing sounds fishy to me. “Won’t respond” and giving her an 8 & 9 to “once in a lifetime” 10’s in both areas in a few short days. I think we have all been made “offers” by Ladies that were difficult to refuse (e.g. Brook Banks). Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
Oh really, then why even bring this topic up.
Great point Hidden Hills.
Brought it up for the same reason I would help a little old lady across the street or whi I still open doors for a woman. I guess the injustice of the matter for the #1 Ranked Lady seemed unfair. Also because I rely on Reviews as being accurate and Representative of what might be expected of a Lady and I “smelled something strange” with the Re-Review in question.
Otherwise could give a shit less!
C'mon Hidden Hills -- you didn't notice this, too? It should be brought up, if for no other reason, than because it was so obvious!
-- Modified on 9/16/2012 8:29:27 AM
So I am not sure if this helps, but.........
So the Gentleman who gave the last review on Cameron (Unlucky2) originally gave her a rating of 10/8 (not 8/10 that cdflix seems to be confused with. So when he made the changes, it wasn't her looks he changed, but her performance). The reason he gave the original score of 8 was because due to mix up his second appointment with Cameron never happened. Once the confusion was cleared up (Cameron had lost/stolen cell phone), they met up and He wrote another review for Cameron. Since TER doesn't allow multiple reviews of the same lady by the same gentleman, the latest one takes precedence. So there is no conspiracy theory. Hope that made sense.
Pretty much what i was trying to say in my earlier post. But, i want to add some additional info that may shed some light as to why The aforementioned provider's ranking is so high. On my second visit i was already pretty tired from working, and after relaxing and conversating for about an hour, i stated that i was afraid i would'nt be at my best for the main event because i was sooo exhausted. What did she do? She returned the next night without charging me a dime and on top of that totally ignored the clock. Such a considerate, thoughtful gesture is almost unheard of in this hobby. No doubt the gent that resubmitted his redited review experienced a similar level of caring when they were able to reconnect. She is truly a remarkable provider.
I understand the stats are a part of this site. What I dont like is the interpretation of what number can I give or get away with giving! Every site has its rules for example
-minimum reviews before being allowed into contention is20.
-longevity of reviews is unlimited.
-the number of reviews is a non factor. Jordan Kay with 460ish is wow but someone in Orange County has over 600 reviews. Can I get a "Damn" with sheer numbers can you go wrong?
- it takes multiple bad reviews or ripoffs for the site to believe the hobbyists.
-one 5minute "Brazzers" or "Backroom Casting Couch" does not make a "porno or adult" star.
In the end, read reviews and make your selections wisely. I've noticed recently too many blowhards or pimps making inflating reviews for there ladies. It's getting more difficult to find a good compatable match for my vacation.