....but, after reading the very long thread that Victoria started below, I think it's a bullsh** review.  Let's just say a person didn't click with an individual who is otherwise very, VERY highly-rated.  OK, that sure can happen, but, in this case he gave the lady a "5" (PLAIN) for a looks rating--that is utter nonsense.  Period.
Also, reading the body of the review, it appears that he DID enjoy himself (nothing wrong with a little ear-nibbling!), so that 6 in performance doesn't seem to echo what he wrote.
All-in-all, it becomes an irrelvant review.  When a lady is so highly rated for so long, by so many diverse individuals, one stinky review should be totally ignored, or, at best, chalked up as "YMMV."
But, jeez, a 5 (PLAIN) for looks--I still can't get over that.  I had the pleasure of seeing her recently, and found her to be the 9 (MODEL MATERIAL) I've known for several years.  Maybe an 8 (REALLY HOT)?  But 9's seem to dominate her 17-plus pages of reviews.  I'm still shaking my bald head over the 5.

thank you Jeffery, it was completely BS

Our 3 most active reviewers with over 300 total reviews, rated her combined score 8.3/9.3
The voices of experience speak
Tonight we dine in heaven

the truth rises to the top

-- Modified on 9/4/2007 10:15:00 PM

so what exactly is bullsh** ?

we are now dictacting to the hobbyists what their perception of their session was ?

or are we just telling them how beautiful to rate a girl ?

he seems to be disgruntled by the discrepancy  between the amount charged and the caliber of girl he received, both of which have changed since the first 17 pages of reviews.

regardless, we are all aware that a review is based on a hobbyist's perception of the session and may not necessarily reflect the opinion of everyone who wasnt there.

the top 3 most active reviewers have reviewed her so no one else's opinion matters.  Didn't you know that?  I didn't know that, not until we were told a few messages up this chain.

-- Modified on 9/5/2007 7:40:51 AM

ooops!  another reason for me to have at least 3 cups of coffee before responding.  I had misread the previous threads and was confused.

My point is that if someone meets another and doesn't have the same awesome experience as her previous visitors had, they are free to say so.  I agree with what Jeffrey is saying ... YMMV is the key thing to remember and everyone has their own expectations and desires.  But I think that to be mean spirited and point out what they consider flaws is just plain wrong.  To mention stretch marks or any other perceived imperfection is terribly rude!    

I recently witnessed this first-hand when a very good friend of mine followed my recommendation and visited someone I know well.  I think she is fantastic and so did the 4 or 5 other gentlemen that met her. His experience wasn't that great. He could have easily bashed her, but didn't make a big deal about it, just said that it was ok, but would not repeat.  IMHO that's the sign of a true gentleman.

ok, now where did that damn cofee cup go?

yes maam.


i love it when men agree with me but really its the yes maam part that gets me wet.

you still learning so its ok studcakes.

Are the "yes maams" working yet?

Why is this such an issue anyway?  AND why has the gal who it's about not posted anything? She cut her hair, he didn't like her and he said so in a review.  Why such an issue?

Probably because it is no big deal so let's move on.  There are more important things to discuss like...
the bimbo from the Miss Teenage American contest - Miss South Carolina - GOT MAP??

Or

Are the Cardinals going to ever have a winning season?  



-- Modified on 9/5/2007 9:45:12 AM

the Cards will have a winning season.  I hope to make it over for a game this season, I'm fascinated by that new stadium..and i hear the chearleaders aren't too shabby either!! hee-hee!!

But, will the D-Backs win the West?

heee heee!
Hope you get to a game to!
Ter

When the Bidwills finally sell the team.

--b.
 (49er fan)