Phoenix

See this thread from the San Diego board....
notsofast 20 Reviews 1465 reads
posted

GND explains TER's position on the Bareback issue as it relates to reviews.

NSF

I attempted to post a review of my very bad experience with Brooklenn, but it has been rejected.  They rejected it because I put in the review that she was willing to do some very risky behavior (edited by Moderator).  I offered to edit it to remove that part, but they will not allow me to do so.  They claim it is for safety sake.

To me, I would like to know if a provider is willing to do things that are not safe so that I can stay away from her.  I understand there position, but feel that it puts me at risk.  Am I the only one that thinks so?  I would be interested in hearing other peoples thoughts on this.

I know that I will get flamed for this post, but that is a risk that I am willing to take.

-- Modified on 7/9/2006 6:44:14 AM

couldn't get the above link to work.

"When they're found, they're removed. The BB claim might or might not be true, either way, it should not be mentioned in reviews.

A big part of the reason is that it attracts guys to her who are looking for that, and, when they don't get it, it could cause her a lot of trouble--even put her in danger."

Register Now!