Shh! You might get invited to lunch.
The other day Zeta got a not so favorable review, it was a really low score on performance. Apparently the guy only got a few minutes total in the sack and had to leave because she had another appointment. What happened to it??? Today it is gone!!!
One who wonders
-- Modified on 11/21/2006 10:48:11 AM
-- Modified on 11/21/2006 2:38:44 PM
Shh! You might get invited to lunch.
not to worry; she just received a great review from me; one she so richly deserves !
I was just curious about why it was gone. Usually there is no smoke without any fire. I am curious who she knows at TER that would take the bad review away when so many other ladies have a hard time getting them removed if it was a bogus review. I don't believe the review was bogus for Zeta though because it was very detailed about location and such. Things that's not mentioned previously in her reviews.
I have to say that my experience with her was absolutely fantastic in every way and the review I left for her reflects how I felt about our session.
Feel free to re-read my review if you like, I know I'll be going back soon.
--yle
WOW, what is going on here??? What is it that some people are trying to insinuate? That I should have said or done anything bad against another provider?? I have no idea about the first post up here or anything else.
I have never said a bad word about anyone on this board ever before, why would I start now? I will not even try to defend the post here, since I find this pretty ridiculous. I have no idea why this has happened but I will absolutely find out who did this, or what happened and I will sure update you on this. There is absolutely no reason for me to do anything like this.
GlenGarryLeads; I find it so interesting that you are so incredible fast on coming to your own conclusions and judging people when you have no clue what is going on, even though you think you do (not just on this issue but many others here recently…many other people have noticed it too). You are badmouthing a lot of people here on this board without the right facts. Zeta and I are all good with each other by the way. I am sure you GlenGarryLeads will come up with something very clever and smart in response to this, but that is ok. I don’t have to come clean because I haven’t done whatever it is you say I have.
In any case, I will go to bed tonight know that I have done the right thing no matter what you say sweetheart. Maybe this will put more fuel to the fire however if I wouldn’t have responded I am sure GlenGarryLeads would have come up with even more stuff about me why I didn’t respond.
Have a great night everyone and enjoy your Thanksgiving ![]()
Swedish Anna
Anna,
Around 2PM the authorship of the original post shifted from "ReadFirstYellLater®" to YOUR name. Of all the possible escorts in the area, why YOUR name? Huh? There are a couple of technical reasons why this can happen, and both of those reasons (unfortunately) link right back to you. You inadvertantly outed yourself as the author. Sucks, eh?
Just curious, if "ReadFirstYellLater®" was not even the author of the bad review in question, why was he/she so interested in seeing it be put back up? What would have been in it for HIM? A competing provider who goes in and writes a false review WOULD have motivation to see it stay up permanently.
Also notice that "ReadFirstYellLater®" stopped communicating. You think he'd jump right in to tell me I'm full of crap. But you couldn't risk that same technical glitch from happening again. Well, maybe you'll risk it NOW, but only after you read this.
And let's now talk about MY motivation Anna. "Why am I picking on you?" (you must wonder). It's because I do my homework. I try to find out everything possible when I'm researching a potential provider. I came across you as a possible provider a long while ago. As I do with each provider website I find, I look up who the site is registered to, and take it from there. You used to register your webiste in your REAL NAME with REAL address. Well, I took that data (along with email address) and started googling. I quickly found stuff that spoke to your true nature as a human being...And it relates quite well to what I'm accusing you of doing. It relates to making a quick buck and not taking responsibility for your behavior.
Anna, shall we talk about your eBay travel business, or would you like me to stop right here? I kept the info in my research folder.
So I may have lurked on this forum for quite a while before I began posting, and you might not like some of the things I have written in recent weeks, but you have been on my radar screen for quite some time as someone who could not be trusted. So when I saw you do something underhanded, I pointed it out. Hint: Don't do that crap and you won't get caught doing it.
P.s. and go ahead and google my screen handle. FYI, this result:
http://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=129396
is not me. I guess another guy in the state also liked the same movie I did. Good on him! Hope he settled his court case.
I now know what happened to my account and if anyone is interested in finding out, please PM or email me. There is actually a different explanation than what have been suggested previously here in this thread. I will not address this issue here anymore. Just one thing. I never wrote the bad review about Zeta. The people involved knows this.
So this gentleman who thinks he knows what happened, doesn’t. If you my friend had done your homework better you would also know that I didn’t live at the time on that address that my web site said and that I lost my travel business (that I actually had for over 4 years, off- and online – hardly a quick buck, right?) because of my ex and it was part of me being homeless (therefore the negative feedback). Have you ever been homeless in a foreign country where you don’t have any family or network? If you want to spread more rumors about me, go a head, you still don’t have the right facts, and you never will. If you want to talk about his, contact me, but I bet you won’t.
To the rest of you, thank you so much for the support. I really appreciate it all.
Puss och kram
Swedish Anna
just seeing how you have reformed yourself brings some me hope that maybe someday others will do the same.
On several recent occasions it's been suggested that the ladies quietly deal with fake or otherwise unfair reviews, without putting it on the board. Now a review disappears and you bring it to the board's attention. ROFLMAO!
I don't know if anyone else saw what I saw, but originally, this thread appeared to have been written by "ReadFirstYellLater®" (I remember this well). Later on, I revisited and noticed that the screen name associated with the post was "SwedishAnna" (no shit folks). "Hmm, that's not how I remember this" I thought to myself.
Now I visit again and the post's author is again listed as "ReadFirstYellLater®"
Now I'm accusing no one of doing ANYTHING here, nor am I implying ANYTHING. But I'm calling this one precisely how I saw it happen. My guess is that the computer system had itself a little hiccup. I wonder if there might have been a hiccup when the message board server might have seen two cookies on the same person's browser.
This *might* explain why a certain someone might have been crying foul when a bad review of a competitor vanished. Then again, it might not have, and again, I accuse no one of anything. I'm just saying what I saw and took note of.
been modified twice and I think it just reverted back to the real poster and then back to the alias...
I think they outed themselves.
oooops
Zeta is fantastic and beautiful; she's a sweet child of mine !
"Zeta is fantastic and beautiful; she's a sweet child of mine !"
Well, that's the good news. The bad news is that SwedishAnna inadvertantly outed herself as a girl who does not like sharing the sandbox (meow).
Anna: There is plenty of room in the sandbox. If your phone is not ringing very much, do NOT blame the young, hottest newcomers for your demise. You and she do not even share the same demographic. Going so far as to write a fake review of your competitor is reprehensible. Complaining about the removal of the fake review is the greed that nabbed you. You f'd up when you tried to modify the post.
PENALTY FLAG. 30-day rate $100 rate reduction (plus a public apology). Let's see that rate reduction in tomorrow's daily reminder that you are still active (and available for appointments).
If this business is not going well for you, might I suggest enrolling in some kind of job training program. You do have a plan for the fact of life that this business will not pay your bills forever, don't you? I certainly hope so. Perhaps this is the wake-up call you need. Those hours you spend online trying to sabotage other providers might be better invested in something for the future. Job training perhaps.
I dont care much what Anna did or didnt do your behavior is boorish irregardless. Also why would you presume to tell anyone that they should offer some sort of discount? That is just pure tacky imnsho
-- Modified on 11/21/2006 10:49:43 PM
I'm prepard to not say another word about it, but I think she should be called to the carpet for trying to damage the business of another girl. Obviously, Anna's phone is not ringing often enough. Anna, if you can't compete on looks and reviews, then perhaps you might have to resort to competing on price.
And to you, I'm sure that YOU'LL get the discount now ![]()
I have seen Anna a few times and have written 2 reviews on her. For her to trash Zeta, who I have never seen, is wrong. I only want to see Provider's who are honest and someone I can trust. If she can not be honest with someone who is looking to make a living like she is, then you can not trust this person to be discrete with your personal info. I am staying away from her for now on. Good luck Zeta and I hope to see you soon. What comes around goes around, Remember this Anna.
From what I've read above, some people saw Anna's name on a post that questioned why a bad review of Zeta disappeared, and then the post was edited to be from an alias. Certainly pointing out another provider's misfortune is unnecessary and tacky, if it occurred.
However, the review was definitely pulled, and yet Anna has not been banned from TER. From that I think you can conclude that the TER gnomes did not have evidence that Anna wrote the review itself, because doing so would be grounds for banning. Providers getting caught writing reviews get nailed...period.
The lady may have done something a bit catty or unkind, but we've seen lots of examples talked about recently of ladies getting reviews from guys they've never seen. Zeta's could have very well been one of those (and frankly, it's difficult to imagine why Anna would target a newbie like Zeta who is hardly a threat to her market.) I think you should be careful to not throw out the baby with the bathwater here.