So I see a review from "Horseman 47" on here last night, and I read it, and it's a good one.   Then I thin, "But, wait, this looks familiar."
I then notice he's posted thirteen reviews in about the past year, but only of FIVE escorts.   Just wondering why this would be, if you've nicely-reviewed someone recently, is there a need to review them again?  He's reviewed some of them 3 or 4 times, most of them at least twice.   All good reviews, I get that, but why keep reviewing the same people?
I just don't understand, can anyone explain?

My guess is he’s using his regulars to get free membership here.

Nice guess, except one only gets gets that for a first review, not subsequent reviews.

Yeah that’s kinda weird. I don’t think it’s wrong but it is odd.  

 
Some people repeat a lot so they see a relatively low number of different ladies. Nothing wrong with that at all. But some people think you need a high review count to establish credibility, so maybe he’s just trying to do that.  

 
I think some clients believe they’re helping the women they like by reviewing multiple times. They don’t realize that this makes a lot of potential clients suspicious of her. That angle has been discussed before on GD or newbie or someplace.  

 
Rich is correct, according to the guidelines he should not be getting the 15 days for the subsequent reviews.

On occasion I have actually had a lady want me to review them again.  If they have not been reviewed for awhile, it helps make them more visible.  

Some providers actually ask trusted customers to post reviews in order to up their ratings and promote their game, usually for a benefit

Is this an issue of some sort?  If someone wants to post multiple reviews of a the same of providers, that’s ok. What I look for is posts from the same hobbiests for the same providers in a very short time frame   Doesn’t prove anything and it’s something that gives me the illusion of control.