Phoenix

Re:No great new indies???
OverCaffeinated 1 Reviews 1995 reads
posted

My comment was meant to point out that you've expressed an opinion about providers you haven't seen, and it appears that you're more willing to try new agency girls than new indies.  That appears to be a fair observation.

See my post above about my history of writing reviews...spent a lot of time writing something, TER refused to post it or explain why, so I'm not inclined to write again.

azhacker2323 reads

when you've got Bonnie and "glide"....what a sweetie. Certainly lives up to all the (well deserved) hype. As always review to follow as soon as practical....

Is somebody actually writing about something fun?  Wait...that's a good thing, right??

YEAH, BABY!

(In other words, thanks for the relief from the drama.)

why Bonnie Parker of course or any one of the other Mystique Ladies.  Glad you had a good time and yes it is nice to lose the drama for a change.  Why don't you get your relief and call us at 480-233-0200

Well she certainly will provide plenty of relief..but you will need the next few day after to recover from your session if you are not properly prepared ahead of time.

Get plenty of rest, take extra vitamins, and drink plenty of fluids

snijder20041470 reads

Have you posted on an independent lately? Thanks for letting me know when!

azhacker1888 reads

There really hasn't been a great indie to hit the scene (thats not UTR) since Isabella Amore. Trust me, as soon as I find one worth talking about you'll know:). However, my "top 5" is still all indie.

2005 was clearly a banner year for the agencies with regard to talent and I havent seen anything change so far this year. Like most things this is cyclical. The one exception is probably Tiffanie (from Austin) who will move up into the elite tier here easily....other than that there is really nothing new thats caught my eye....



-- Modified on 4/22/2006 3:53:20 PM

You need to read more carefully.  You imply that you've seen some of the new indies and they're not worth talking about, but isn't the truth that you haven't tried them?  The recent reports on Mona Lisa and Jenna (notwithstanding her drama), for instance, have been stellar.  You seem to have a preference (maybe a bias?) for agencies.  Any particular reason?

azhacker3154 reads

I'm simply making an observation. The query above implies exactly what you seem to be doing as well. The truth is as I've stated, given all the opportunites right now the agency options seem to be winning out. Are you going to argue with Bonnie and Tia vs Jenna and Mona Lisa....or say that those two are better then Mya and Sarah?

All I said is that I haven't seen anything new that matchs the obviously high standard set by MJ, JK, Mya, Isabella (either one), British Brook, Sedona or any of the other obvious bench marks....BTW....hwen are you going to review anyone but your ATF??

My comment was meant to point out that you've expressed an opinion about providers you haven't seen, and it appears that you're more willing to try new agency girls than new indies.  That appears to be a fair observation.

See my post above about my history of writing reviews...spent a lot of time writing something, TER refused to post it or explain why, so I'm not inclined to write again.

Register Now!