Phoenix

8-9s...NOW WAY !!
johnnyc 13969 reads
posted

I only hope that the new Moderator can bring some legitamacy to the reviews...While I have not posted reviews I can tell you that many of the 8-9s that we see rated are not even close.It is dissapointing to take the time to see some of these ladies,based on reviews,and then have an out of shape, overweight girl show up

There are few reviewers that seem to rate fairly but more that are either made up by the provider or a reviewer that was given some sort of incentive...No way many of these are 8-9s.

Sorry, but Moderators have no part of reviews at all. I fyou have a complaint about reviews bring it up in a problem report or sen an email to Staff.

Rick7779822 reads

Every reviewer has his own opnion.  But their are problems with some reviews.  But their would be less of a problem if others would take the time to review.  So how about you posting some reviews?

johnnyc11521 reads

I posted a review after having seen one of them and the moderator, at the time, I assume decided not to post it.The review had no profanity and accuratley described her physical appearance..Believe me, this wasnt a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder..She was " severly " overweight. Disgustingly overweight.  Why take the time to post review only to have it withheld..By the way this particular girl has been reviewed MANY times and all with 8-9 for appearance..

Johnynyc, your last post used these terms:She was " severly " overweight. Disgustingly overweight.Believe me, this wasnt a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder..
I am a BBW provider and I find it hard to believe that if you had properly reseached the lady in question you would have known what her "size" was before you scheduled with her. Most of us BBW providers here (active on TER) are always HONEST about our weight, size and other physical features. At the risk of being lambasted for speaking up, what you discribe as "severely" and "disgustingly overweight", some see a fat chick as beautiful and alluring. Just because you don't share the reviewers point of view doesn't mean you have to be derogatory. Yes it is a case for beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and what you hold as beautiful may not be every other hobbiests ideal either. This is a bone of contention with me, since some of my reviewers have been suprised at my apperance when visiting me, but that isn't my fault. They didn't read the info on my site which describes my physical appearance. I must say though, that once they overcame the initaial shock of a big woman, they reviewed my services in high numbers. It's all a matter of perception.  If BBW's aren't your cup of tea then stay away from any review that says she is heavy, large, fat, or any other term that describes the provider as anything but slim. I hate to post a negative response at any time, but I felt it my duty as a bonified proud fat chick to speak up on this weighty issue.
~Malissa~



-- Modified on 7/7/2003 7:08:56 PM

Whether YOU find fat women attractive or not is totally up to you and I respect that. When you refer to us in an insulting and DISRESPECTFUL manner it's time to correct your ignorance.

The review section here covers everything right down to if a provider is shaved, has piercings, tattoos, implants and what is her breast appearance. It also includes 'BUILD' which they are kind enough to use 'HEAVY' to describe us fat women. Granted, it doesn't distinguish between 'pleasingly plump' and 'oh my good lord, holy cow, geezus who let the elephant out?' but that is where it becomes a manner of 'in the eye of the beholder'.

Some think that if a woman doesn't look like a twelve year old boy or a coat rack she's too heavy. Others think that some fullness to the hips and breasts is great but if the belly is big they're too heavy. Still others like a huge butt and thighs, small waist and huge breasts and if the waist is wide she's too heavy. Then there are those who think that if a woman is under 200 pounds she's not heavy enough and still others who think that 300 or more isn't enough...and those guys think that the 'boy-like' women are 'disgustingly' underweight! LOL

I have many excellent reviews and my 'appearance' description states that I'm 'heavy' (and I make it very clear on my website and phone message) and the reviewers have described me as everything from 'attractive' to 'homely' but they have ALL RAVED ABOUT MY SERVICES ;o) These are the guys who know that it isn't ALL about the outside of the package... the inside might hold an awesome surprise and they were smart enough to try it and see for themselves :o)

johnnyc13601 reads

You both are missing the point...You both advertize your qualities exactly as they are..thats great! If a guys wants to see a larger lady,thats up to him. If that is what he finds appealing,thats great!

The issue is providers that advertise themselves as petite, athletic, in shape, etc and turnout to be larger ladies. That is what is misleading..They should represnt themselves accuratey..The reviewers are also part of the problem because they are purposely describing some of the physical attributes innaccurately

By the way, to your point, I just looked at two reviews of two ladies I have met and they are both desribed as athletic. they are not believe me!

Well if the reviews say one thing and you are experiencing another when seeing these providers, did you ask them why there is such a huge discrepency in the reviews?? Maybe some of them have gained weight since they were last reviewed. Are the reviews old? You should try resubmitting your reviews of those ladies and if they aren't posted, email the appropriate webmaster here at TER that handle the reviews and find out why your reviews aren't being posted. Another question is, did you contact these ladies before setting up an appointment and ask some general questions as to their physical stature?  As for missing the point, I didn't miss the point, I just wanted to point out to you that ettiquitte and being a gentlemen, are qualities that most ladies like, so refering to ANYONE as disgusting is just plain mean. and you know what the bumper stickers say..."Mean People Suck". :P
I am sorry you had two bad experiences with providers, but maybe next time you should ask more questions before taking a review at face value. Now if the ladies in question had spoken to you and lied about their physical body type, well then they deserve to be poorly reviewed, but never called names based solely on their physical apperance.
Just my opinion...and you know what they say about those lol
~Maliss~

10kRunner8552 reads

Good for U, Malissa.your site has nice photos-u describe height/weight.

Problems too come when previous 8 & 9 Looks girls get someone pissed off because they wanted something girl sd on site she doesn't do. Appt made anyway,& then give a 6 or 5 review?

Why f*** over providers when she writes on her site she doesn't do  *****  or she's a BBWW & then u still call chick?

Wrong.

kissit11392 reads

There are no victims only volunteers.  Why so chicken?  Why pay for a session with a girl who is not what you had intended on seeing, then when all is said and paid for and you are safe behind closed door's where no one can see you, you all of a sudden have something to say? Weird. I mean if it were my money I would decline.  Be a man about it, because speaking up about it after the deeds already been done makes you look like less than one.  this in for all the guys who complain with out ever saying a word about it to the provider herself, how tacky,  if you have a problem why not hit the source.  then i would have respect for your comments.

I am not thin however I am in great shape and I have had men consider me overweight. I weigh 140lbs. I am 5'7". I am actually smaller than my pictures considering that I weighed about 160lbs when they were taken. I have just this week had new pictures done and am very anxious to have them back to put on my site. My point is that you might want to ask if someones pictures are recent. I have to say I agree that you should research the lady you are thinking about seeing. If nothing else e-mail her and ask for a recent picture. Also are you looking more for a bargain, or for the perfect girl for you? You might be looking in the wrong place. Just a suggestion from someone who is not fat by any means but is not annorexic either.

#1: The "Testicular Prime Number" Theorem (also called the Theory of Testosterone-induced Relativity):

"A male's perception of his "length" is inversely proportional
to his perception of his own "girth"."

#2: The "Testicular Perfect Number" Theorem:

"A male's perception of his own appearance is directly proportional to his expectation of perfection in escorts and inversely proportional to the money he is willing to spend for that perfection."

#2a) Lothario's Corollary:  
"A male's perception (and testimony) of his own performance is directly proportional to his expectation of performance of escorts and logarithmically and inversely proportional to the reported time it takes him to perform."

---------------------------------------------------

I have seen Donna and she is most definitely NOT fat.  She is one of those ladies who is MUCH better looking in person that her pics can demonstrate.  She also has a dynamite personality and TONS of energy!  If I didn't have to use 3 tanks of gas to travel to Donna's incall (somewhere close to New MExico or Texas I think!!), I would see her more often!  You need an incall in Scottsdale or Phoenix, Donna!!  

-- Modified on 7/13/2003 12:07:12 PM

Register Now!