A new provider on Phoenix411 - Sarah!  I had the pleasure of spending some time with her this morning and had a fantastic time!

I have no problem with anyone "shilling" for favorites and am not intent on reopening any old topics....but we all know that "Sarah" isnt anyone "new".....so why not just say you had a great time with an old favorite of yours instead of posting something that might be taken as misleading by some........

but isn't she new to 411?

and she's certainly a great addition to glenns lineup. But she's also well known here so she's certainly not "new". I haven't commented at all since I'm not really aware of all the details regarding the change over. But since we have the same URL etc obviously its not something expected to be "secret". I'm not throwing rocks here but simply questioning the need to be "cute" considering its someone with a strong reputation and following here on TER already.

"a new provider on Phoenix411"  key word hacker is "on"  followed by Phoenix411. Sarah, although I have never met her, may be well known to TER, I think her post on Phx411 is a first and I see his post as harmless.  It seems that anytime anyone mentions something nice about Asherah or Sarah you have issues....you cap your statements by saying "throwing stones".  Get over it dude...no one is throwing any stones your way....just a few bones for a seemingly pleasant lady, Sarah.

Think it pretty obvious to anyone that the lady is not new to the biz. Geez, she has some 5 pages of reviews. Think the guy was simply singing her praise and calling her to our attention based on a good experience he had. From her reviews, it would appear that she offers an excellent service, to LOTS of the guys.

Hacker, who asked for your opinion?  The best way to not reopen an old topic is to keep your mouth shut.

I think your comments are mean-spirited, unappreciated, and a bit hypocritical from someone who blatantly shilled (to the tune of four or five separate threads) his own ATF (who was merely new to TER) in September.  

Previous posters are right...in the past year, any time you’ve seen something positive written about Sarah, you’ve had something negative to say.  Odd, since earlier posts say that you saw her only once, 3+ years ago, and in a 2004 post you referred to her as “great”!

Even when you say something somewhat nice, you add "but..."  (Just search messages for the keyword Asherah, posted by AzHacker to see my point.)  I think the comments here make it clear that people see through your bias, and I think you should just shut up when it comes to someone you have no current information about.

A few months ago, you gave "Game Ball #5" to Glen for being "the sheriff" of our community.  It was Glen who wrote the headline on www.phoenix411.net that says "new independent."  (It was also Glen who shot those terrific pictures.  http://www.phoenix411.net/escorts/sarah.htm )  All CG did was echo what he read on 411.  So, if you have a problem with the description, take it up with The Sheriff who wrote it.

[Edited to remove a W.]

-- Modified on 1/14/2006 9:19:53 AM

anything negative (here or earlier), I simply stated an opinion (mine). As for Rebecca, she's been one of the best kept secrets in phoenix for years (and BTW was Asherahs roommate and mentor in the business). I Actually wrote Asherahs 1st review (and it was BOTH GOOD AND ACCURATE).

In fact I'm just about positive that cg found her thru my review....

I dont have any bias for or against Asherah, I do have a bias against misleading reviews. Go look thru my reviews here and find a single on thats inflated or incorrect or misleading....the gals I've "shilled" for dont get any special treatment....often I "grade" them lower then average.

I have no clue how you or anyone else takes any offense to my post above. I'm simply curious at the choice of wording...

Found her through another source.

Re:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 EOM

Not sure what Ciara is counting down (or up) for, unless she is trying not to explode over an unnecessary controversy that I had hoped was dead and buried long ago.  Please, Please, can we keep things civil this year until at least, say, February  or so?

This is a cute and private joke between Muffyman and me. I don't even remember what you're talking about, sweetie. You should PM or email someone on something like this.

Hugs,
Ciara

As a newbie to TER . . . I want to make the following observations:

cgsmks post did say . . . "new to Phoenix411” . . .  so technically his post is accurate.

But, I did not find azhackers post “mean-spirited”, in fact it clarified for me that Sarah is not new.  If I’m not mistaken, Sarah is an independent, and I can now link to both her website and her TER reviews via Phoenix411 for the simple fact that she is now listed on Phoenix411 (i.e. she is new to Phoenix411)?  Do I have all that correct?  Well then, if that’s all true . . . someone needs to explain to me why it’s of any significance at all to any TER member that Sarah is new to Phoenix411.  And if being new to Phoenix411 is a mute point, then azhacker’s opinion is well founded.  

azlawman-- unless I got the facts mixed up, I have to agree with azhacker’s post (at least in principle) . . . and after reading your post carefully agsain . . . it seems that if anyone has been mean-spirited in their opinions . . . you appear to be guilty of your own accusations.  

cgsmks-- being new to TER (and before reading your post I knew nothing about Phoenix411) . . . your post about Sarah had me thinking Phoenix411 must be an agency.  So I found your post confusing until I looked on Phoenix411 and found that Sarah is an independent.  What relevance does Sarah’s advertisement on Phoenix411 have to your positive experience with Sarah?  Why mention to TER members that Sarah is new to Phoenix411?

-- Modified on 1/15/2006 1:58:29 PM

..considered a good source of reputable ladies in the Valley of The Sun.  Glen, the owner, does his best to make sure of that, plus he does a lot of photo shoots (I'm sooo envious!) and web sites for the locals.

at least that's the opinion I've formed based upon my limited time here...I could be wrong!

-- Modified on 1/15/2006 3:27:31 PM

bringing anything up, I simply commented on the original posters choice. I'd have handled it differently given "sarah's" following and reviews....nothing more was intended or implied. BTW were you a hall monitor growing up?.....Sure seems like it.

Last year I did make a fairly harsh comment and observation. The comment was directed at a few folks who I felt were misleading in one aspect of their review and my own view on what would be appropriate. Again it was simply my opinion as a 20+ year hobbiest with a lot of worldwide experience. You'll find a subset here who seem to forget that this IS a hobbiest board and those types of comments (within reason) ARE appropriate....this post had nonthing to do with the earlier thread but for some reason azhallmonitor felt the need to link them....

just a private joke directed to me.

Great post lawman, you hit the nail on the head not only in what was originally posted but on the follow up, especially hacker, who obviously has somenting agains this lady based on his past postings.  AND, (excuse the screaming) if you have not seen this lady, you have missed one of the best times of your life.

Sarah's favorite saying would apply here:  "Make Love Not War."

Or - I HAVE A HEADACHE!

Even though this is a "Discussion Board" and there is a discussion going on but it still gives me a headache!

Let's just go on - PLEASE!

I dont have anything at all against "Sarah".

My original comments were not aimed at her at all. Why you and a few others get wrapped around the axle because I'll come out call something the way it is astounds me. It's not "mean" or having "something" against someone. It's simply an honest assessment of a single aspect of a provider as per the chosen review format here on this board. Anyone can go look thru my reviews and will find I'm prertty objective across the board....unlike some of us here....