Unfortunately I haven't been on this review board in quite some time and I enter this morning with some confusion and a bit of shock as to why Mrs. Bonnie Parker received not such a good review considering her other reviews and the real BP in person.This is so sickening to see girls get reviewed incorrect. They are out there working their asses off to please us, and look great for us, and all we have is a number to rate them by which obviously is abused. Smokeyone you try being bonnie for a day because I bet even with all the ass kissing and smiling that you would do you would be lucky to see ANY number on your reviews not to mention be able to actually get through an entire day. Now I don't know who this smokeyone character is that made this mistake but he apparently has a problem which could be one of 3 things. 1)He made a legitimate mistake and accidently reviewed the wrong girl, ok possible 2) He's a liar who is possibly trying to get back at someone or 3) He's a blind,faggot Personally I'm willing to bet it's either 2 or 3

His review was very good and a very positive one...Just because no 9 or 10 was given? Maybe the rest of the reviews were over stated?

Being Bonnie for a day is no different than being any of the fine beautiful ladies we in Arizona have!!!!

Just really who are you to judge anyone here!!!!

you should have skipped shining the spotlight on this review...which isn't even a bad one.  Look at Smokey's review history.  He looks like a thoughtful and fair rater.  You owe him an apology.

-- Modified on 8/19/2006 9:55:47 AM

Personally I think Bonnie is a smart attractive gal whose alot of fun. My review of her speaks for itself....that does not however mean everyone will feel the same way.

Assuming that your referring to "smokeyone's" review you obviously dont have VIP status. 1st "8,8" is not a "not so good" review. Bonnie has 3 10's 6 9's and the 1 8 for performance and has 2 10's 5 9's 2 8's and a 7 for looks. The review fits nicely with the broader context. Further his actual review (the part that really counts is damm near glowing)....not a bad review at all, just a review from someone whose personal "scale is calibrated a bit differently then yours or mine.

Seeing that you dont take the time to write reviews or otherwise contribute why dont you just take the sign and jamm it up your....

of the providers here in the valley...especially "head". however you are correct in that the review was positive not negative and the rating was consistant for the reviewer in question. As for the "other reviews" being overstated...hardly. Then again your clearly a biased observer since this alias (whoever you are) seems to be simply an indie shill. Which is where you'll find the large percentage of "overcooked" reviews IMO.

Until you can say you've tried everyone, don't make such stupid comments!!!!

thats exactly 30 more then you have. What you are is a mouth...nothing more or less. you have zero standing here as far as i'm concerned. You simply represent some third parties opinion. My "opinion" is pretty damm accurate when it comes to this market. Basically what you (sir or madam) are is a simple waste of bandwidth and a real example of why alias's are a bad idea.

I have never seen Bonnie Parker and i probably never will. How ever that may be, you have no right to question someone elses review for anything other than factual content that you, yourself are aware of. The man paid his cash and he can write what ever he sees as the truth.

Now as too your other comments if your head is so far up this chicks ass that your worried about how her day is going, then you need to A:
never call her, see her, or even inadvertently bump into her at trader joes.

B: take your ass to Brazil, The Big Phil or Thailand, and bang so much anonymous pussy in such a short space of time that any one, or who its attached to no longer matters.

you gots you some issues and that is a fact.

I have concluded that: modprod and Hacker are the same person and simply representing themselves under different persona's

1. their writing styles are so disparate, that I have to conclude it is a ploy.

2. at social events, I have never seen both of them in the same room together. One always leaves before the other arrives (still can't figure out where the phonebooth is though- ever try and find one of those recently!).

And we know modprod HAS pretty much tried everybody out there.....

Seriously, hacker was using a common expression and you know that Miss Wah Wah. So, why get your granny panties in a wad?

I don't wear granny panties anyway, sir! I must say my thongs get into the crack of my ass though! got a problem with that?

-- Modified on 8/20/2006 12:14:26 PM

-- Modified on 8/20/2006 12:16:08 PM

That he understands the way that the review system is supposed to work: i.e. just because a girl is eligible for a 9 or a 10 doesn't mean that she automatically should get one. Think about it, to get more than a seven the provider has to offer a premium service.  Is that extra service the same from anyone or are there some who are exceptionally good at it and some who are just average? If their is variances in aptitude, then shouldn't there be variances in rating?  Unfortunately, too many of us don't get that and it dilutes the usefulness of the rating system.

-- Modified on 8/21/2006 5:52:42 PM

-- Modified on 8/21/2006 7:17:58 PM

and you, Sir, are no Modprod.

(AKA "How Far Off Topic Can We Take This Thread?")

and not a shot at Modprod. I could be wrong but that is my guess................

Yes, you are correct sir!

Modprod can leap tall buildings in a single bound.. I trip over a piece of paper and am lucky if I don't inadvertenly tie my own shoelaces together.

Modprod is lean.... I am closer to the pillsbury dough boy.

Modprod is articulate and well spoken.... I am a dork.

Modprod has little hair...uhhm, I have little hair.

So, you are correct CO - I am no modprod. But, never implied such either

Signed,

Dork Thor

(or, as Granny Panties Wah Wah might say - Dick Thor).

a mind blowing "no holes barred" multipop GFE experience from a very pretty gal to be a "premium service". Your not talking about someone with just a few reviews...or reviews from one city. This is a gal with a very high average score on both scales. If you have VIP and you'd take the time to read the reviews you'll find her service is remarkably consistant...much more so then other very well known very well reviewed gals. I do not mean to sound critical but you have 2 reviews...look at the average number of reviews on some of the guys who've seen Bonnie...

However, the argument isn't if Bonnie (or anyone else) is a 9/10.  The argument is if anyone is required to be rated a 9/10 simply because of their past reviews or their stated services. There's too many people as it is that slap a 9 or a 10 on almost every review they do.

People have off days and that should be reflected honestly, not covered up or shouted down when that is brought up in a review.  If we don't, then all we have is a list of rah-rahs by sycophants.  That's not helpful to anyone.

I appreciate that you're not trying to be critical.  I do have VIP, I did read all her review, and I realize that she has been well reviewed by respected hobbyists.  It's just that an 8/8 just doesn't scream conspiracy to me.  Like I said, maybe she just had a bad day.