Although I don't necessarily agree with the angry tones of the general argument, I do appreciate the well thought out and well written satirical logic. I am guessing that the poster here is simply answering the question in general and not actually directing this to the original poster. He or she basically makes the arguement and concludes it with his or her rhetorical premise ending with the last two sentences as really the thesis.  My guess is that this post was made by either a provider, or a male who perhaps is involved with a provider on a more frequent intimate level than just friendship.
Nice peice of creative writing anyways. Brilliantly structured and to bad its a shame that it was stated under an alias.

P.S. I read this post several times to really understand what this person is saying. I believe this is a statement supporting providers as real people rather than inanimate objects of gratification for the purposes of self amusement. Perhaps I am wrong, but I don't think so.

-- Modified on 9/28/2006 12:25:35 AM