Good on you rojo54 for exposing this former excellent Provider for what she really is today - a FRAUD. I KNOW there are others; maybe many, who have had similar experiences as you, but fear retribution from the Lady in question and/or her SO. Your courage is what will make this Board relevant.
You deserve our thanks and our applauseI believe rojo54’s Review to be an honest Accounting of his “visit” with the Lady. Read his other Reviews, nothing like this one. If she objects, rojo54 might have to prove (via copies of e-mails or PM’s between them) that he saw her and he probably can do that and will.
Want corroboration of rojo54’s story – see the “Reviewer’s Only Board.”
By the way, there are others – probably lots of them – who could come forward with similar stories.
She has been a major “Rip Off” for some time
That's why I never saw her.......
...now, how long do you suppose it'll take before either that review disappears or the scores are 'adjusted'. 
Won't be the first time.
some one with some balls. read it quick she has a way of having them removed.
If this isn't the definition of "the boys club" I don't know what is. Funny how it is that you men can go on rant and raves about providers poor behaviors and you get a parade of praise on this board. If providers go on a rant and rave about hobbyists and their poor behavior they get a scarlet letter branded to them
Strange how everyone on this thread, EXCEPT YOU, is using their “Sign On Name.” You sir, have selected to remain anonymous, which is likely an indication of your relationship to The Lion, from The Wizard of Oz.
Dear Mr mangina (or pissy escort) hiding behind an alias,
The primary purpose of this site is to facilitate the selection of escorts by men. We share information freely and the escorts have the opportunity to communicate with us and advertise their "assets" and availability. I have heard rumblings about this particular provider many times and have seen quite a bit of her board drama over the years. If the provider behaved as Rojo54 has detailed then he is well within his right to share that information with whomever he chooses, particularly after dropping a grand for such a pathetic performance.
It is precisely this type of situation that emphasizes the value of this community. I greatly appreciate the candor of this reviewer and his comments have reinforced my previous opinion of this provider
I'm an equal opportunist, everyone is entitled to a rant not just you jerky boys. I grow tired of seeing posts from only men on here who have nothing worthwhile to say. My two favorite ladies who always lit up this board and made my day brighter have quit posting for which I can't blame them because you still live in the 1950's where you think women should only be seen and not heard.
I'm using an alias, for I know if I didn't the jerky boys would waste no time filling up my inbox with rubbish
See how much you know. Just because you use an alias doesn't mean we can't PM you. Most of these types of rants go on the reviewers only board, but its nice to see that Rojo stood up to his bad experience and posted an honest review. I'm sure that review will eventually be removed, because it doesn't fall within her average performance scores, or if she complains enough. There have been other complaints about her, heard through the back channels, and I give Rojo props for standing up to the flack I'm sure he's going to get. Rojo we've got your back.....................
By the way I think your the one stuck in the 50's. You are the first to come to her rescue, being the equal opportunist that you are, why not let these very independant woman stand up for themselves. By the way this is the best post we've had in awhile
The written description of Rojo's experience matches the score. I'll bet TER allows the review to stand as it is...
This truly infuriates me b/c IF IT'S NOT difficult to have a shitty review deleted, then we've all been betrayed at some point, while some having suffered great monetary loss. I feel as though I was sitting on the lap of Santa Clause, who just informed me the Easter Bunny wasn't real. Then there's myself having just gone through hurdles to have a review removed that was completely fake, as I had never met the guy who turns out, was just trying to maintain his VIP membership. But I'm still just learning here, & if what you guys claim is true, then perhaps the "YMMV" disclaimer separated the investigation methods of my review from others in question of removal, as its score WAS within ball-park consistency of all my other reviews. (I didn't have it taken down b/c of it's score... rather b/c of its absolute false reporting of an experience that never took place whatsoever.)
Nonetheless, this alleged practice of the administrators is quite disturbing... as we all know, it defies every principal this board was created upon.
What if you went to a review site for babysitters b/c you were in need of one? And due to the same level of review foul play, you end up hiring a John-Wayne-Gacy to care for your children? This is an extreme example, but my point is that readers need to have faith of the reviews they read as truthful, to prevent further disaster in this case.
I have met with Rojo on more than one occasion. God as my witness as much as I have studied human behavior, this is NOT the type of personality who would BS this review. I believe he reported it just as his sound cognition processed the experience. While it's POSSIBLE that I am wrong, it's just NOT PROBABLE. And the fact that he is praised to come forth (which, I praise him too!), is sad if not frightening. But thanks Rojo... taking this one for the team, & at a substantial price, unfortunately. My hats off to you & Cdfix! I'm certain the others who were brave enough to come forth with similar experiences were most disgusted to find their testimonies had soon disappeared.
Who knows, maybe shots called by administration is a difficult position in these cases, simulating a court-room judge. And generally, a scandalous character can provide one hell of a convincing plea. But the pattern shouldn't be too difficult to detect if one review-ee has successfully executed several, similar rebuttals to ONLY her "inconsistent" reports... having them removed from her record.
The only thing I can deem worse than having received a bad review would be receiving a bad review on something you COULD HAVE otherwise easily controlled. But then you've gotta' acknowledge that clever stage name (though this really is no laughing matter)...
o the earlier point, this is a review site of gentleman who use their hard earned dollars for entertainment.
A lady getting pissy on this board is like a restaurant yelling at a cusomter who did not like the service. All it's going to do is backfire. Fix the service and there will not be an issue.
There are a lot of restaurants I'd like to try, but it takes a lot of work to weed out the bs.
I to applaud rojo54. And also CDFIX for starting the discussion.
This is not negative - but a MAJOR step in the right direction. Open discussion about this is definately needed in this town. As are more reviews like his
So, is it against the rules to name the provider in question? I looked at rojo's reviews, and there isn't anything even close to a bad review listed, so I assume the review in question has been removed. So, who are we talking about here?
So forget that option.
The review is still up
I've been on the receiving end of a Big Gulp sized ration of shit for giving a review that was out of sync with other reviews so I can imagine the emails and texts rojo is getting as we speak. Call em as you see em I say, and stick to your guns.
This man worked hard to save up for that experience.... What a let down! I felt bad for him just reading it!!
-- Modified on 6/17/2013 1:26:57 PM
eck, most visits are so chat oriented. Or full of diversions. Yea, in two hours he should have at least received 22 minutes of play time 
And incredible play time at those rates
I have debated on whether to post or not! I do not like to get involved in drama, but I just would like to say...I have heard stories from different client about bad experiences they have had with providers and do not write reviews about them for fear of retribution of some sort. I personally wish the clients would post these reviews, as well. Everyone can have a bad day, but if you are not going to give the client your 100% you should not accept the appointment. Men save up to see that "special"provider because of her stellar reviews and bypass other great ladies who can give them a wonderful experience for less money! I personally want my reviews to reflect what actually occurred. I have only asked for one review to be removed because it didn't sound familiar and I did not recognize the handle. I tried to contact the client and he never responded, so TER contacted him as well and he didn't respond. It was actually a good review, but I don't believe it was true, so I didn't want it attached to my profile. I have even heard from a client that one woman told him "If I had known you were going to write a review, I would have put in more effort." Really? I do not perform differently whether the client is going to do a review or not. I treat everyone the same and I hope I make everyone feel special while we are together. There are too many ladies out there for clients to choose from and they deserve to get what they paid for!! Bottom line...providers should receive scores that they deserve based on the appointment...good or bad! My response is in general terms, not for the specific incident in question. I was not there, so I do not know what really happened!
always worry about creating the best possible experience w/in capability, if there were no review repercussions discrediting our advertised claim? (Well, actually, we still would to some degree, but I'm trying to make a point of course...)
In short, & I'll just be honest, much of what I go through before a date in order to present the best possible setting, comfort level, & active experience, is based upon the fact that reports of my service quality DO exist & are viewed (by me) as the 'next possible review', beforehand. Keeping this distinct possibility in mind I suppose helps keep me sharp & allows no room for laziness or anything less than my best. Now skeptics reading this may think that's a shallow, disconnected attitude that concerns only the covering of my own ass, though in a way it is, BUT ALSO, in a way, it is not. It IS b/c my reviews rest upon the good-will of my name, aka, my product brand name. I have to protect my brand name if I want any kind of demand for my supply... therefor great reviews help achieve this & anything less defeats my mission statement (aka, my ads' claims)... I want to ensure great reviews to expand my market to achieve success. Pretty simple. Conversely, it is NOT (shallow, disconnected, etc) b/c of exactly what I just explained... b/c in the real world, reviews would be based upon real-life testimonials & the only great ones would be a result of my determined efforts. Instead of deeming this as being ONLY out for myself, isn't this exactly what all Hobbyists are looking for when seeking their idea of over-all 'product' satisfaction? It's a mutual, sincerely concerned accomplishment both parties hope to successfully achieve, in light of everyone's happiness & goal-oriented attainment... an intelligent approach to a win-win situation.
The result of no available public awareness for potential consumers of an otherwise inferior product, only drives down the quality of its entire industry. This encourages/confirms inferiority as something acceptable within its market, & promotes no healthy competition... competition that would otherwise raise the bar of expected consumer quality for the whole industry. We'd still be driving around in '58 Edsels if this weren't true.
Simple really - she sometimes has them removed. She has threatened to expose guys hobby to his co-workers and love ones. So is her perfect 10 reviews a lie? Not really. It all depends on what kind of mood she is in. I do believe most of her high mark reviews are real, the problem is that she has intimated lot of guys to not to write bad reviews or has it removed. She is like a box of chocolates. You never know.......
... you've gotta' take a bite out of every one of 'em & put 'em back until you find the ones you like!
Any Provider who threatens to out a guy she's seen b/c of something so blackmail, CAN BITE ME! Would be great if that really resolved anything, but I'm in a 'no tolerance' mood today anyway! 