Dude will you stop harassing this woman??? If I refund you the money that you spent on seeing Brooke will you STFU? The reason that she has numerous 10`s is because she is and AMAZING woman. Its that simple. Obviously you overlooked this small caveat of information when you saw her. Seriously if you want your $1500 bucks back then email me; it is worth if you just get lost.
Brooke IM sorry that you have to deal with this harassment on a constant basis.
Ok, I've asked this question before, but I'm going to persist a little more on the chance that someone will own up to what the f**k is going on here.
23 out of the last 26 guys who saw Brooke is saying she is a 10 in looks. If someone could shoot free-throws with that percentage they could make $10 million per year.
Guys...really...what the f**k is up with this? It is simply not possible by any stretch of the imagination.
What am I missing here? Are guys somehow incentivized to give her 10's? Are "less than 10" reviews somehow minimized in the reviews?
Really...this undermines the whole confidence I get depending on reviews here as reliable information.
Somebody have the balls and fess up - what is going on here??
on the rest of us. One has to question you true motivation here.
You gave a 9 score in looks to five of the six reviews you've written, and a 10 score to one. Only three are not delisted, and of those three:
Jamie had five 10 scores, Annalise had three 10 scores, and you gave Lisa her highest score (so following your logic, she must have given you an incentive). The difference between a 9 and a 10 is purely subjective. Since you are so "generous" with your own looks scores, I just have to wonder if you've somehow developed a borderline stalking thing about Brooke since you've now posted this BS twice.
If you are so bent on this, you should have to justify Cheryl's 10 score from you because I'm not buying it - she definitely wouldn't have gotten a 10 from me, so, again, she must have given you an incentive. So prove to us that she deserves a 10.
(BTW, in case you've missed it, that was a way to prove my point that YOU cannot justify your score for Cheryl because it was YOUR definition of 10 that you used, so the only thing you can say that that you felt she was a 10.)
Get it through your thick scull - the reviewers your are questioning don't, and shouldn't, have to justify their scores on looks to you. Every time I look at your handle now, I see it as callmeadunce, which would be more fitting, I think.
There are so many providers on these boards that have multiple 10's, and you are not repeatedly questioning them, so, again, what is your personal problem with Brooke?
My point is not that I might give a provider a 10 and someone else might give her an 8, etc. I get that different guys have different subjective conclusions about looks and performance. Got it.
My point is about the NUMBER of 10's Brooke has garnered. There is not another provider IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY who has this many 10's - both in number of 10's and the percentage of 10's given out of all reviews.
Based on my own PERSONAL observation, this is simply not possible. Could she get 10's here and there - sure, she is attractive. Is it plausible that 23 of the last 26 guys that saw her say she is their "once in a lifetime"? No - it is simply not plausible.
Nobody has the balls to simply state what is going on here. It's just the same bunch of guys coming to her defense.
I have read some speculation before about what might be happening here. Someone should speak up and say it plainly.
And...it IS important because, for me at least, this is the kind of thing that undermines the whole value and credibility of the reviews.
Not only should clients be concerned about this issue, but other providers should as well.
But that Jessika James is interesting in the grand scheme of this topic.
If you look at her scores she was getting nothing but 9's over and over, bad bad bad. They she upped her game so that she is all 10's now. So yeah, it happens. DaFa might want to try her on. hahahaha
may be borderline legitimate in the interest of review integrity, although the sheer number of reviewers who rate her a 10 would strongly suggest that you are the one who needs glasses. But saying it twice on a public board with her name in the caption is just being mean to her and insulting to her reviewers.
By questioning the validity of her looks or service, you are offering the kind of publicity a gal can't pay for. Your stance also avoids being flamed for 'shilling'.
Seems pretty simple to me.
Well done, and on behalf of BB, thank you. She is quite the hottie, isn't she?
sarcastic, or are pointing out an unintended consequence of his post, as opposed to suggesting that he is secretly working on her behalf...
But if you read his first post about this issue, there is a strong implication that the large number of 10s she has received is something more than happenstance, or at least that is what I infer. That would be a serious charge.
If this is accurate, I just think he needs some factual basis to make the charge, or else should stay quiet. I've never met the lady but her pictures are quite striking.
Posting once to question discrepancies could and would be absolutely acceptable on this board... and usually results in decent banter back and forth.
But in this case, he obviously didn't get the answers he wanted to hear the first time, so he's trying again.
Why? Who knows...
Perhaps he was refused a second date. Perhaps he realized he was the one asshat who underrated this particular provider.
Whatever his reason, posting the same negative rant twice suggests 'sour grapes'... and with the plethora of gentlemen rushing to her defense... well, it's more positive advertising for Brooke than I'm sure he intended.
I always figured that anything above an '8' was decent, so I'm not quite sure why anyone (providers and hobbyists alike) would get their panties in a wad about numerical scores. Like they mean anything in the grand scheme... ya either click or ya don't. Case closed.
Once was enough . . . and her pics looked pretty hot to me (as someone else wrote, maybe that was the whole point), so no, once with this was even too much. Twice is being a pain in the ass. Congratulations, sir, on earning your ANNOYING merit badge.
Yes, I realize it...that is why the first sentence of my post states I have asked this question before.
I have asked the question again because nobody was willing to step to the plate and give an honest answer.
I have heard a couple of other people suggest in the past that negative reviews of Brooke's had been removed. Based on my personal experience, compared to her almost perfect record of 10's in looks, I tend to believe this is possible.
What I'm asking for is someone to step up and be honest about what is going on here.
Dude will you stop harassing this woman??? If I refund you the money that you spent on seeing Brooke will you STFU? The reason that she has numerous 10`s is because she is and AMAZING woman. Its that simple. Obviously you overlooked this small caveat of information when you saw her. Seriously if you want your $1500 bucks back then email me; it is worth if you just get lost.
Brooke IM sorry that you have to deal with this harassment on a constant basis.
I've never seen Brooke, nor is it likely I will. I have no idea whether she is a 10 or not, though, based on her pictures it's clear she's attractive. I fail to see why her high ratings are troubling you. Many men may all find her to be incredibly beautiful, and I don't see why this means there is some sort of conspiracy afloat. Do you suggest that Brooke is doing something unethical to earn these scores? Is she offering discounts or something? If she is, and no one has provided any evidence of anything of the sort, why should that bother you or anyone else? There is universal agreement among the female population of the planet that I am NOT a 10. Does this mean they're all lying because they agree? Or does it, instead, reflect something about me? Sometimes, I admit, people may all agree about something that isn't true. 500 years ago everyone would have agreed, for example, that the earth was flat. They were wrong. That, however, is an objective fact. Why is it so impossible that many men all have the same subjective experience? Honestly, when I have given a provider a 10 in appearance, a portion of that score was how she looked to me after a session. Her performance, for me, affects her appearance. This is probably the case for many of the hobbyists who have given her the score. She made them feel incredible, and that helped them to see her as more beautiful than you've seen her. I simply fail to see why this bothers you. She's hurting no one, so far as I can tell, and neither are the gentlemen who have rated her so highly. If you have a reason to be concerned, perhaps you could express it more clearly. From my point of view, your concerns are baseless, pointless, and a waste of time. If I'm wrong, I look forward to understanding why.
The deal is simply that you have your opinion and everyone else has theirs. You are doing no good here with your raving about Brooke. You are her best advertisement right now but your credibility is slipping and sooner or later your reviews wont be worth reading or may end up being a black mark on a girls profile, because you are being so nasty about this. You actlikeitisa personal attack every time she gets a 10 review. I dont even think I know any providers who are so catty about reviews.
So just in the interest of maybe showing you the light....you say it is not possible to get a 10 performance with 23 out 26. What if her name was Jenna Jamison instead of Brooke? Anyone who has seen a Jenna flick ... 10???
Hhe brings up a legitimate point. And he's right, it's nothing but the same bunch of dudes coming to her defense and name calling and etc. There was an article that the board mods were giving more 10s and taking away bad reviews for providers that gave them free services. She could've let a board mod fuck her in the ass in exchange for good reviews. No, wait, she wouldnt do anything so dishonest for personal gain. Oh, i forgot, this whole fucking hobby is dishonest, illegal and based on personal/monetary gain.
I just got through spending the night with Brooke last night. I have experienced enough providers in my time to know what a "rip-off" is, what a "clock watcher" is, and what quality non-rushed time is. We started @ 10:30 PM and I left at 7 this morning. One expensive date, but worth every fuckin' penny! And, for the record, callmesundance should know that she was BETTER than advertised, with no signs of 20+ lbs. that I could see (or feel)! All the right curves in all the right places, and we explored a lot of places. Although this was my first time with Brooke, I have watched her over the years and her photos don't lie. Just because some of you are lousy conversationalists with stale personalities, beer guts, flabby asses with stinky shit and the like, you want to chalk it up to a fault on her part? Quit your agenda pushin' and just ENJOY a true treasure like her. There are FEW around! TER needs a new scale to accomodate Brooke, 'cuz 10/10 does not do her justice!!!
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
