There are 3,785 ml in a gallon. Assuming an average of 3ml per aliquot or alitwat whatever your prefer that would give 1261 "shots" per  gallon. Now each shot requires siphoning with an average 6" pipette. (If  you are like me you can do the same  calculations with a much smaller  number) 1261 shots/gal x 6"/shot = 7566 inches/gallon, 12inches in a foot and 5280 feet in a mile so 7566 divided by (12x 5280) gives us  0.12miles/gallon.

Is this what it's reduced to here?

Viva la revolution-if this is what we are left with, burn it all down and let's start over.

This hasn't been a hobbyist board for a long time, so scrap it.

Or go elsewhere. I have said it for two decades...

NO ONE controls the hobby. Not even this. Not by a long shot.

JJ-alias free since....always.




-- Modified on 4/1/2007 1:18:35 AM

steupppsss!!!!!

Dear Doctoral Candidate Dorpdom,

As you know, you are not allowed to take on the title of Professor, based solely on publishing your doctoral thesis. Your thesis must be peer reviewed. Although your thesis will garner qualified peer review status when published in a peer reviewed journal, you did not ask for such when publishing in this questionable journal.

Additionally, per paragrah (D), subsection (A) of section (T) - chapter (Y) (of which you are intimately familiar and it is rumored a master of) your thesis must be proven with empirical evidence. Such as samples taken from a broad range (and only by qualified technicians) of donors; analysed on the spot, possibly using state of the art Complementary Ionic Methods.

Working with a local Researcher, the faculty of Hanover J. Forensics University (HJForU)has developed the following recomendations.

Mya Mayes,
Sweet Sarah,
Jasmine AZ,
Isabella Amore

The following donors have been contacted and are willing to provide unbiased, straight, hard samples. They are in agreement that doing whatever is necessary - no matter how many sampling attempts are required - is an act of public service and as such are willing to work with any (or all) of the tecnicians.

modprod,
overcaffeniated,
thor18,
bosaz,
Teach4u,

Please contact the technicians at your earliest convenience so that they may work with either these prescreened donors, or that they may perform their own screening prior to seeing a candidate donor. Note that simply offering to donate does not, in itself, qualify a donor for working with these technicians. These technicians can be very selective and require two references.

Furthermore, some technicians have mastered the various sampling techniques but they are only working with a single preferred technician. Therefore, candidate donors working with Isabella Amore and Mya Mayes must be of strong heart and endless energy and should be examined by Dr. Ubangi prior to their appointment.

Additionally, some of the prescreened donors have yet to work with each of the technicians; and may welcome the oppurtunity.

Due to privacy laws, you may not observe sampling in any way. The technicians are more than qualified to handle the prescreened donors, and your backward presence is unnecessary and would possibly be a distraction for some of the donors. Although, it is rumored that one donor has developed a bent for working in public.

Respectfully,

Colene Bormy-Johnson
Advisor for Doctorol candidates for doctors of JISM
Hanover J. Foresnsic University (HJForU)

[at edit] - does it really matter what I changed?

-- Modified on 4/1/2007 8:56:56 PM

-- Modified on 4/1/2007 10:14:35 PM

Reoctoral Thesis

LOL!!! That has to be the most unabashedly hysterical posts I have read all year!!! BTW Dorpdom, merely rambling an endless series of conversion factors does not render one an expert. An expert would actually be able to explain the significance of the "mumbo jumbo" they type.