I noticed a gals reviews and she has now 5 reviews.  4 out 5 gave her a 5 or LESS for performance.  At how many reviews will a guy realize that the odds are that this is not a good choice?  

5 - Plain 5 - Average
4 - OK if you are drunk 3 - Barely worth the effort
7 - Attractive 5 - Average
4 - OK if you are drunk 3 - Barely worth the effort
7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time

I realize many a time YMMV applies but if I were looking for a good time, this one would not be it in my opinion.  

So question is, at what point in reviews do guys decide not to TOFTT and skip a gal due to bad or average reviews????

Just curious.  Thanks and hope everyone is doing well.

Misty

1 who reviewed her.. and do i know if they have an agenda or not (some score low if a girl doesnt play ball with certain "things".)

2 price point... if the price is 150 or less ill take a chance just in case i find a personal diamond. since my experience is the only one that really matters when you get down to it.

3 location... if shes close by and im bored and shes availible well theres a good chance ill see her though ill also have an exit strat in mind

If I'm looking at purely reviews, I throw out the high and the lows and then decide.

Peformance must equal an 8 or above.

There are too many beautiful peformers to waste my money on ymmv providers.

There is a lot of subjectivity involved in a review, and I think we all accept that.  I tend to look for familar names, and reviewers that I agree with as to shape, style, and services provided. I don't rely on the numbers... I read the text of the review when making my decisions.  My problem is I like ALL women.

haven't had any reviews of them posted yet and the guy is going to take a chance on her and report back to the team. Once a provider has been reviewed, especially more than once, and is pretty consistently below par, I wouldn't waste my time or money on her.

I look at how the review rates the provider, but I also read what the reviewer has to say.  Sometimes I find that the review is put off by something that reallys isn't all the much of a deal breaker for me.  It's more of the complete picture that is painted (with a dose of skepticism added for a reality check.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  So, one man's 8 may be another man's 4.

Even performance can vary (not by much, IMHO), depending on the connection between those involved (when I lived in LA, I saw a gal every week for nearly 2 years.  most times were 7's and 8's.  Yet, there was a 9 and even a couple of 4's). However, if I saw too many low performance scores, I'd pass.

For me, who posted it isn't that big of a deal.  But, if it's their first or second post, I'm a bit leary.

While location is not a problem, I'm not that thrilled with traveling from GY to AJ, but if I found her appealing, I'd make the trip.

Unfortunately, cost is a big factor for me now days.  So, a lot of ladies are out of reach just because of this.  

-- Modified on 5/7/2008 2:46:55 PM

i dont know how this happens.

for performance she has 9 guys score 1
and 1 guy score a 2

appearance is mostly  7

-- Modified on 5/7/2008 5:25:55 PM

Like others have said, sometimes certain variables/circumstances may warrant taking the plunge even though a provider has received consistent subpar reviews. However, in this particular instance the one variable that jumps off the page is that theses hobbiests are in TX. Maybe they are a bit slower on the uptake there? J/K! lol!

I agree here... what is the use of a TER membership if not to rely on the collective knowledge of the group!  The only thing I can think of is that the boys are learning too late about the research ability of TER.

Ana, darling, the Sheika doesn't know how this could happen either; but I can speculate.

We all know that the rating system is out of whack for a myriad of reasons. In most cases it is essentially meaningless for the simple reason that there is not enough statistical variance in the scores.
 
However, in this particular case, the scores might shed some light.

I would imagine the lady is very persuasive, a real sexy gem on the phone, with great personality. She can sell and sell and sell and she is an impeccable closer. But, as far as being a business professional, she is ethically bankrupt.

Her scores are few and—for the most part—far between.
 
If the scores are correct, she is either: burned-out, psychotic, or a thief-- or, a messed up conglomeration of all three. Possibly she is forced or pressured into escorting by circumstance or a significant other; and, inside, she harbors repressed feelings of guilt, anger and rage. She may have children and she may hate men.

This is not a happy person. She needs help. She may be a danger to herself and others.

PEACE AND LOVE,

Sheika Fatima
[email protected]  


-- Modified on 5/8/2008 1:12:17 PM

Clearly the ones after the first guy can't read....

I don't do this often, but when I do, I want postive memories!

RocketMan36

her age gives it away.

and she's doing the ol "let me dance for you while you do yourself routine"  tip me if you want this or tip me if you want that and you're still going to get nothing

she was probably working for the agencies in her 20s (back in the pre-ter days) and thats  the 'routine' agencies taught u to do.  i had one agency tell me that if they suspected the girls were doing anything more, that they'd set us up with LE.

i'm not referring to agencies like desert divas, az confidential and tlc which are a relatively new wave of agencies that are committed to customer satisfaction.

-- Modified on 5/9/2008 6:36:57 PM

Yes, yes, yes, she’s probably an old style agency girl!

And, Ana, your extra bit of speculation is a very interesting and informative part of the puzzles. It helps explains why her ratings are as unfathomable--and intriguing--as they are.

But, I still stand by the rest of my analysis:

I would imagine the lady is very persuasive, a real sexy gem on the phone, with great personality. She can sell and sell and sell and she is an impeccable closer. But, as far as being a business professional, she is ethically bankrupt--as your very apt discription of the way agency girls operated in the past points-out.

Her scores are few and—for the most part—far between.

If the scores are correct, she is either: burned-out, psychotic, or a thief-- or, a messed up conglomeration of all three. Possibly she is forced or pressured into escorting by circumstance or a significant other; and, inside, she harbors repressed feelings of guilt, anger and rage. She may have children and she may hate men.

This is not a happy person. She needs help. She may be a danger to herself and others.

As always, PEACE and LOVE,

Sheika Fatima
[email protected]  


-- Modified on 5/10/2008 3:36:02 PM

-- Modified on 5/10/2008 3:38:19 PM

-- Modified on 5/10/2008 4:15:05 PM