Write Review
2,075,735 Total Reviews 3,571 New Reviews
13,490 Users Online

Philadelphia

Re:review credibility
calvin17 25 Reviews 5406 reads
posted

I may agree with your opinion but, isn't this a contradiction?  You say you understand that the reviews are "purely subjective and to each his own".  That being said..then why put her down further with your own opinion on the boards?

MainlineGuy6025 reads

I understand that the numbers for appearance and performance we assign to the ladies we see are purely subjective and to each his own .....that being said when,I see a review of Dana from "philly companions"with a 9 assigned for looks"model material" I have to respond.I saw Dana on one occasion and she is a very pleasant young lady but she is a 5,on a very good day a 6 in virtually anyones book. If she is a 9 it has to be on a 15 or 20 scale.I don't mean any disrespect to Dana but in light of some of the suspicion focused on posts by the owner of this service this latest review has to be viewed with a significantly raised eyebrow!

ReplyQuoteReport
calvin175407 reads

I may agree with your opinion but, isn't this a contradiction?  You say you understand that the reviews are "purely subjective and to each his own".  That being said..then why put her down further with your own opinion on the boards?

ReplyQuoteReport
MainlineGuy5488 reads

there is subjective opinion and then there are opinions posted that have to be rebutted so that the basic premise of the review board is served,that purpose being a hobbyist can have reasonably accurate expectations of what awaits him behind that unopened door.I repeat,I don't mean this as a disrespect to Dana...she is a nice young lady and very pleasant to spend time with.However...some of the ladies who have been reviewed in the last 60 days that were given appearance marks of 7's,8's and 9's include Karina,Anne Yorke,Shandra Morgan,Barbi Hart!I would consider my A.T.F.,the recently retired Beth Maxim a solid 9.Jazzmine Gemini doesn't consistently receive 9's!!!Any one who has seen  these ladies-- decides to see Dana and expects anyone approaching the appearance of these ladies is going to feel they were misled and misinformed.

-- Modified on 10/17/2005 8:52:21 AM

-- Modified on 10/17/2005 9:03:32 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
trident685416 reads

I agree in concept, but it appears this latest review is by someone who has submitted a few other reviews, some several months ago.  

It *looks* legit, IMO.

However, I agree that there's a great variation in subjectivity.  I've not seen Dana, but by the pics and other reviews I'd be hard pressed to give a '9'.

Only slightly related, I was checking out someone from Ambiance -  she got a '5' and a '7', but as you read the text, the guy just couldn't say *enough* great things about her.  It's, in my opinion, and example the opposite direction whereby the text suggest absolute top-rating but the numbers don't match.  

Someone pointed to another a few weeks ago, where they had like 4-5 pops and did everything but swing from the chandelier - yet gave a '7' for performance.

That's why I tend to think in averages and in using multiple pieces of evidence in evaluations even though much of the time I pick on 'hunch' and not by scientific methodology :)

ReplyQuoteReport
Oxey Moron7025 reads

I don't know of the woman you're talking about so your suspicion's may be true. There are definitely questionable review's for some of the women. However, you said it yourself, "I understand that the numbers for appearance and performance we assign to the ladies we see are purely subjective and to each his own". While you find her to only be a 5 or 6 this guy evidently thought otherwise, if it's legitimate. About 10 years ago I was shooting the crap with a couple of guy's at work. The conversation turned to "who do you think is the hottest women on daytime TV". At the time there was a show on called "Home Matter's". The host of the show, Susan Powell had me bowled over, man did I think she was hot. When I mentioned her as my choice the response I got was, "you've got to be kidding". This amazed me because I thought she was all that and then some, hell, she was Miss America 1981. I have to admit though that I liked her more recent look as opposed to her crown day's. Just goes to show how people have different taste in what's attractive, damn good thing too.

Related Link: http://www.missamerica.org/our-miss-americas/1980/1981.asp

ReplyQuoteReport
photogpa5316 reads

She looks like Monica Lewinsky. Your name isn't Bill Clinton, is it?

ReplyQuoteReport
MainlineGuy7615 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Roland Lestor Hushback5898 reads

Isn't that what pictures are for? To see what a woman looks like? While the looks rating is objective, I personally think the performance rating is the most important in relation to a review. If the womans pictures did not intrigue you why would you even look at the reviews?

But then...one mans "once in a life time" can be another's "she just laid there"..as in everything YMMV.

ReplyQuoteReport
MrMaxHardcore5343 reads

Guys, Just do your homework and look at the reviewers usernames, plenty of "new" providers post or have someone either they work with or friends with post phony reviews.....especially nowadays...I would name names, but look for yourself and do the leg work...EOM

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!