Philadelphia

Re:Magick's reviews... detective work
trident68 3 Reviews 2589 reads
posted

Actually, you gave a heckuva lot more info than I had.  Other than the recent 10's (which is *possible*, though suspicious) I was thinking solely about the writing style.  I think you called them bulleted, and yes, all those short statements of similar writing style.

Thanks, I'll watch and see but these don't make me want to rush out to see her.

I may be completely wrong, so let's not start by assuming anything.

Check out the latest two reviews on Magick:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=70323

Other than the fact that the latest two are first-time reviewers (not necess. a problem!) - notice anything about the two?  It may very well just be me, so I'll leave it at that.

I noticed something fishy too.  She probably is good but not that good.

You could be right.  The way they are non explicit and not very descriptive.  

They also go against the grain of her former reviews and what she looks like.  Its funny how I saw her old site with pics and it said nothing about her being a Pornstar and her pics while not ugly, definetley were not Excellent, she has a lot of excess belly flab and then all of the sudden recently that site has dissappeared and this new one is up that doesnt work!

So maybe she got busted and possibly they are using her mantra.  I wouldnt put it past the Police in the area even though its illegal.

I agree that the reviews seem a little scripted, which coupled with the new guy status of the reviewers makes one wonder.  However, if they are shills it makes one wonder why, as this provider seems to have several reviews both under her name and as a dou that are from more established reviewers that are pretty decent.  Actually the new reviews make me shy away from seeing this provider.

I have never met or contacted Magick.

I looked at the two reviews.  Seem a little fawning. New reviews make me suspicious.  Kiss ass reviews make me suspicious.  U talking about the way the reviews are bulletted?

Before she updated her site, i noticed a couple things that made me take notice.
1. A photo of her seemed to have some pretty intense stretch marks.  Now, thats not usually a problem for me if its a cute girl with a nice chest, but its tough to award a 10 to a girl with that body type.

2. She is willing to do doubles with Cat or Aleera.  Now Cat is one of my all time favorites. So, i tend to give Magick the benefit of the doubt.

3. Aleera was a lot of fun too, but Magick's description of her in the old site listed BBBJTC.... Well, I visited Aleera, had a great time, enjoyed myself immensely, but the TC was not available.  I have no quarrel with Aleera on this, she never led me on.  Magick (or her webmaster) provided the incorrect info.

I recommend Cat highly (I gave her a 10 in technique that was downgraded to a 9 due to TER gudelines.)  and Aleera nearly as highly (technique is a 7....  Would be a 9 or 10 if she did TC. )

I did a Cat review... will get around to an Aleera one



Actually, you gave a heckuva lot more info than I had.  Other than the recent 10's (which is *possible*, though suspicious) I was thinking solely about the writing style.  I think you called them bulleted, and yes, all those short statements of similar writing style.

Thanks, I'll watch and see but these don't make me want to rush out to see her.

Cat is a nice gal but here are the issues I had with her...

1. She's overweight by about 30 to 40lbs.
2. The photos that she posts are not recent and/or don't show her weight problem.
3. She smelled bad down below even when she was several feet away from me.  That could be a rare occurrence but she had to know it smelled bad.
4. Was willing to do bareback FS - I should've ran for the exit door because of this.
5. Her BBBJ technique while good isn't great.
6. Add all that up and the $300 price tag is way over priced for her services.  You can find better for that kind of $$$.

I would rate her as follows...

Looks (face): 8
Looks (body): 4
Service (BBBJ): 7
Attitude: 8

I would like to know how someone rated her a 9 (model material) in appearance and a 9 in service.  Simply not accurate.  The only plus she has going for her is that she's nice, normal (not flakey), and isn't a clock watcher.

Register Now!