kind of mystified here concerning reviews that are approved and not approved...recently a review was not approved because the provider reviewed did not have a direct link...had to go thru her friend/provider....ok BUT....at the moment there is a review of Sweet Autumn with NO contact info AT ALL no website, no telephone no nothing....the review that was previously mentioned had at least contact info and a way to see her pics...a note was sent to TER so this might be corrected if the Autumn review is fixed or taken down....AND ALSO.... in looking at some approved reviews going into the details section...not much info there but approved...while in the past reviews on this side have been disapproved " for not enough detail" and yet those disapproved reviews went into much more detail than some of these very short reviews....strange but true.

Totally agree.  My last review was initially declined for not enough details.  I sent support and e-mail asking why.  I added a few more acronyms, but the review remained essentially the same in length and description.  And it got approved.  It's also taking very long to get reviews through the system.  Wish they would give an explanation.

I agree 100%.  There has been no consistency re reviews on this Board.  I know other members that do not even submit here anymore because of bad expereinces.  Who has the time to resubmit due to arbitrary rules?  It is too bad since it deprives all of us of more information.