I'm not disputing his review, but I had a great time with her. She's sexy, playful, smart. I had no complaints and have repeated, which I don't do very often.

I have a review in the pipeline and then I saw this one and it really is 180 degrees different than my experience.  I just don't get the review.  He says she's average looking but he gives her a 7, which is attractive.  He gives her a 6 for performance, but if she was as described, she deserved a 2 or lower.  

But he did get somethings right.  She does play music from her mobile telephone and she does have tats, but I thought she was very, very pretty and was going to give her an 8 or 9 for looks, and an 8 or 9 for performance.  

And I don't know where the 15 years of escorting came from.  That would make her about 33 at a minimum (assuming starting at 18) and she looked to be in her mid to late 20's to me, which is what she claims to be.  She could be 33 but it is a well-preserved 33 for sure.

I know two of her earlier reviewers to be pretty solid guys, so I would trust their experiences and mine over magicd's.  However, there is nothing worse than a drunk escort (or hobbyist) so if KK was drunk, it would certainly influence anyone who dealt with her.

So, I dunno

I was with her and she was great read my review