I'll say I want him back, anyone else?

although I do not condone making up false reviews to gain free access to this site, the guy was a wealth of information and would be welcomed back.

I'm just logging on for a minute but it seems like a no-brainer.  The man is as a tremendous voice on the Philly boards.  Over 100 reviews?  Give the guy a break!

I guess the only question is, due to the acusation of Making false reviews, how many of the 100+ are real?????


That being said I still think he should be allowed back.

-- Modified on 5/25/2007 6:55:27 AM

How do we know any of his reviews are false, Who made these claims, hobbiests, providers, Tiger?? Since most of his recent reviews were of Tigers girls I doubt it it was him...hell he benefitted from the reviews and from what I could tell buy other reviewers they were legit.

PM STAFF and voice support for reinstating him with the reasons you'd like to see him back OR BETTER yet:

EMAIL--    [email protected]  and cc

[email protected]


I have NO control over who is banned or not. Mods are not employees of TER, and we are NOT paid.

For the record, I voiced my support for his reinstatement  with STAFF twice!




























































-- Modified on 5/25/2007 8:50:38 AM

Thanks for the info Fuzz...

Maybe Hawk and PGGW had established a relationship where Hawk volunteered to "test out" the new girls.

I have a few long time clients who have volunteered to try out any new girl that our agency acquires (Usual Donation of course!). This way, I know exactly what type of service the new provider really provides. Especially if she's new to the biz, and doesn't have previous reviews that I can locate.

This looks like it might be the case, and if so, very smart on the agencies part, because at least they're try out guy, Hawk, writes reviews and has mad credibility in the community. Which is ultimately, a double-win for the agency.

Unfortunately, In my case, my "try out" guys are old timers who are very active hobbyist, but don't write reviews and are board lurkers. (Ladies, you know all about those, the ones that love you so much, but won't write a review, because they just don't) It's good because they give me lots of feedback, but not so good, because they still have to go through the excruciating initial process of being a new provider with no reviews.

If you guys are just speculating, then allow him to come back, even if there's a probationary period to incur.

-- Modified on 5/25/2007 8:18:29 AM

even though she called me a tiresome maggot... and even though I am not sexually attracted to her, mentally I was in deep love with the lass... and to think that she had a cute accent as well!  oh well!  my loss.

WTF BSD...not you! LOL



-- Modified on 5/25/2007 8:23:36 AM

-- Modified on 5/25/2007 9:53:06 AM

-- Modified on 5/25/2007 8:25:38 AM

Who says we cant mention Christophtrac?
TER?

To top it off - only 1 or 2 hot gals.... yeeeeeeshhhh!

My local club was a little dead as well -- even the bar I go to downtown had an 'off' night, even though the band was a good one.  I still had fun though, and my fave bartender will be out drinking to celebrate her birthday tonight -- woohoo!  It always surprises me when the club has a bevy of beauties, and the crowd is lame...