Granted it is a a good one, but anyone who knows me and sees me knows, I don't do any of the services he described.  

It's annoying when some guys don't want to pay for VIP and just pick out some random girl to review so they can get the freebie.  

I already reported it to support so hopefully they remove it ASAP.  Thanks for listening to my rant.

Sloane

that makes sense, anyone that has seen you knows you are much more than a 7

you right it's not bad.. for that service it deserves a higher rating.

-- Modified on 8/20/2008 1:12:32 PM

Sloane is a kind and caring person.  To spend just a little time in her presence is great.  She cares about our little community and goes out of her way to ensure that we are provided with choices we might not have thought of.  Clearly she is intelligent.  From my first encounter with her - it was clear that she is focused on customer satisfaction....  it is also clear that she is a multidimensional being....

I consider her a friend... OH, and for the record, although I've never had a session with her....  the thought of someone doing this... bugs the crap outta me.  she is too nice a person.  to whoever did this "Get a life."

What did he describe that you do not do? Sounds to me like you are just pissed at the fact that he gave you a "7". IMHO Personally I think the review  sounds like at least an 8 but it is not my review.
You have take the good along with the bad.  Your comments about him wanting FREE VIP is ridiculous. The guy has 111 reviews and has a history going back to 2003. With 111 reviews he has free VIP privileges for 9+years in the bank.

If Support removes it they are WRONG and so are YOU

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberID=287159&Membername=trudny

It's because I never met the guy and clearly, I do not "SWALLOW" or allow to be throat fucked!

I have plenty of 7s and the rating has never bothered me once, it has never detered any new clients from seeing me because I have a great reputation as a provider among other things.  To each his own.  

Simple as that.

Sloane

-- Modified on 8/20/2008 11:02:55 AM

-- Modified on 8/20/2008 11:03:59 AM

This guy that reviewed me, I have never met.  I have not done an outcall in months!  Just the review itself, all the services and acts he said happened never happened.  Granted it's a decent review but I want to keep my services accurate.  

I am now getting e-mails from hobbyists about these services now....lol.

The gist of the story, the review is fake regardless of the ratings.  I never met the guy and I just private messaged him asking when I met him.  So let's see what happens.

Sloane

But like I said before, if the review was accurate and I met the guy, I wouldn't be posting this right now.  I am now getting plenty of e-mails from clients asking about this "TALENT" of mine, too bad I can't perform the fetish!

Sloane

Quit your fucking bitchin' It just sounds like you were extra horny and wild that day, big fucking deal. Sounds like you gave him some nice deep throat, you go girl

You mean to tell us that you never laid on the bed and let a guy do all the work while you just opened your mouth wide. come on.. that is fucking common. You have fucking done it.  No one would have thought twice if you didn't get your panties in a bunch.

LET THE REVIEW STAND.

he has seen some women that I have seen, I compared his looks rating with mine and he gave you a looks rating higher than I would have given you based on the numbers he gave the similar girls.

it's just that he wrote it with the nasty detail accented.  nice review, I got wood

-- Modified on 8/20/2008 1:11:23 PM

but I don't put the details out there... why, cause maybe the gal was horny and on that night - and in that period of time, I was handy...  no biggie, but it do happen.  But I get the feeling that this didn't happen.  as to writing a review that agrees with yours.... pick a gal - any gal... who is reviewed....

and I can read the reviews, look at her pics... and write an entirely accurate review, without ever having met the lady in question....  this is not about that, this is about accuracy.  fidelity in reporting the event.  some women I meet with do various services, but not with everyone - ME included... I don't beef, if I do not get what I am looking for - I may ask, and if it is not likely that I will get it, I probably won't be back...

as to he has so many reviews... he does not need the VIP credit... I do wonder about that... and the darker of my thoughts is that this is someone who wishes her harm...  and that is NEVER good.

What is YOUR problem?

Point is things he described never happened. I NEVER met the guy.  Simple.  Stop being a coward with posting under an alias.  

S

about at least one thing.

This reviewer has 111 reviews x 15 days credit per review = 1665 Days of credit.

1665 Days / 365 Days a year and voila you get 4.56 years, not nine.  Amazingly almost the same amount of time he has been on TER.

And lets look at that review history.  This guy is regular like clockwork...a review on average of every 15 days or so...I am averaging, I'll admit, but still, 24 in 04, 25 in 05, 28 in 06, took a few months off in 07 so only 17, but back at 14 and on pace for 20+ this year.  Just enough with a couple of problem reports to keep him in VIP all year long.

So instead of backing a reputable provider with a strong board presence and a great reputation, you come to the defense of a guy who has NO board presence on ANY national board...not one posting ever...and none on this board for that matter.  

And you slam her with incorrect facts all from behind a convenient alias.

Reviews are subjective, but they should at least be real.  In this case between the two options in this case:

1.) A guy who has NO board presence and writes reviews where he treats the ladies like crap and almost always makes them cum instantaneously with his DATY and where He seems to fuck a lot of them down the throat.  (edited to correct an unintentional error)

or

2.) A great lady with lots of great reviews, strong board presence and classy defenders who use their real handles.

I choose to side with Sloane on this one!

I realize I am not from Philly and this is not my home board, but I felt the need to chime in on this one.  If anyone feels the need to flame me or PM with your disagreements I understand.

At least I posted under my handle so you can do so.

After all, this is JMTC

-- Modified on 8/20/2008 9:33:12 PM

every single lady he sees.  (edited to correct an unintentional error.)

And amazingly he almost always seems to be on the low end of review numbers that a lady has after getting services that would easily warrant higher scores.  Since he almost always cums at least 2-3 and he gets them off several times, one has to wonder what it takes to warrant "8 - went the extra mile".

Also I find it interesting that you chose to blast away from behind an alias.  If you feel so strongly about this, why not put your name on your comments and own them.

You want Sloane to step up and own what YOU claim she did, why not lead by example and remove the alias from your post and "own" your comments.

Again, I usually don't get in the middle of pissing matches, but it really galls me to see "Alias Tough Guys" bashing a lady who simply wanted to alert board members to a fake review...something that does nobody any good, but the guy getting his 15 days of VIP and status as a big reviewer.

JMTC

Terrev



-- Modified on 8/20/2008 9:37:49 PM

When she says the review is false, I believe her 100%.  She has never given me any reason to doubt her integrity.

I do hope the reviewer will chime in on this. Some of you guys are on a warlock hunt.
You, terrev, are acting like a spoiled WK, counting his VIP days, and commenting about his reviews.
You don't even know the guy.
Once again, your two Lincolns are worthless.

BTW, you are not getting in the middle of a pissing match. You are part of the pissing match.

"well reviewed ladies who quite clearly do not offer the services he seems to get EVERY time."

"1.) A guy who has NO board presence and writes reviews where he treats the ladies like crap and almost always makes them cum instantaneously with his DATY and where He seems to fuck a lot of them down the throat and CIM with ladies who don't offer that."




I just read his last 10 reviews and compared them to others and found no inconsistencies  regarding services.

Since you are so ready to impugn the integrity of this hobbyist please produce FACTS.

Show us 1 review where his review is so out of line with other reviewers. I agree that HIS performance ratings are lower than most. In my humble opinion that means he is probably more HONEST with his review scores.

Lets all be honest.     A 7 means "Hot time.  Who among us haven't given a 8 when it was probably really a 7.

very valid, non-bitching, warning of a fake review and three wannabe Reviewer's White Knights have to chime in with BS so strong, you can smell it from the screen.  Recipe for a great train wreck.

Any moron with the ability to type and click a mouse should be able to look at her reviews, determine that she's had 12 scores of 7 or lower over the years and absolutely ZERO posts complaining about fake reviews.  Therefore, these guys must have someone typing for them since they are obviously too freakin' stupid to do it themselves.

Box_Of_Rocks, Vincent-Vega, and especially thereviewisfine, if you love the guy so much that you have to White Knight him without even the vaguest idea WTF you're talking about, you must be looking for services better found on the TS board.

She's got absolutely no reason to lie about this, and every reason to bring here as a warning to those of us who actually take the review process seriously.

But hey, if you want to have whoever is typing for you throw out some more BS, please go right ahead. I love a good train wreck.

Losers



-- Modified on 8/20/2008 7:26:16 PM

My post was directed to terrev. Why don't you reread my post. I did not not "WK" for the reviewer.
As for you, toy train... the TS board is yours.

I Would Love To Hear From This Reviewer, Too, But He Has NEVER Posted Under His Name on any national board or on this board.  A fact you would have learned if you read my entire post.

Second, I am not on any kind of hunt.  I am simply pointing out some facts.

Spoiled WK...really...how am I spoiled?  I have worked for the money I spend hobbying and have never gotten free service from anyone...how am I spoiled?

Also, "I" did not count his reviews, "thereviewisfine" posted the number of his reviews just a few posts above and commented on the amount of VIP time this would have earned him.  He used that as a basis for him being legitimate, but grossly miscalculated.  I simply stated the FACTS about how many days he would have actually earned.  (BTW, You could also have looked on the top 100 reviewers list for the number to avoid counting.)

"You don't even know the guy."  Very true!  Do You?  If you do, please encourage him to step forward and clear his name if he can.  If you don't know him, why do you feel the need to defend him, by taking cheap shots at me, from behind an alias no less?

As for my my two Lincolns being worthless...you are wrong.  My two Lincolns are worth just as much as your two Lincolns...and actually probably a little more since I at least used my real handle and people know who's two Lincolns they are...instead of using a cowardly alias to make attacks.

I just don't understand while there is such vitriol lobbed at a provider for trying to remove a fake review, and such vigorous defense of a guy no one seems to know and who won't speak for himself...curious...one might get the impression that someone has an agenda that has nothing to do with defending trudny.

Again, just my two cents.

Terrev

-- Modified on 8/20/2008 8:44:00 PM

edited my posts to remove those comments.  

I have found at least 4 occasions in his first several reviews where he received services above and beyond what is stated, but I have removed the comments in order to give him the benefit of the doubt.

You asked me to "Show us 1 review where his review is so out of line with other reviewers."  Most of his reviews are out of line with other reviewers.  He often gets a long list of services that warrant higher scores and more often than not, his reviews are on the low end of a provider's scores.  In his last ten reviews, he was the lowest score on the first page of reviews for 6 of the ten ladies.

I will admit that at least one of your points was valid and I was glad to correct my error.  I guess I wonder why it was necessary to hind behind an alias to make your points?  If you are being straight about your motives, and I have no reason to think you aren't, why hide?

Again JMTC

"Two Cents" Terrev

my opinion is worthless, and attack me for pointing out a gross miscalculation of someone blasting a well known provider from behind an alias and you are NOT White Knighting for the reviewer?

I think one of us needs a refresher on what White Knighting is.

LOL




The Other White Knight

"I have found at least 4 occasions in his first several reviews where he received services above and beyond what is stated"

"Most of his reviews are out of line with other reviewers.  He often gets a long list of services that warrant higher scores "

"Since he almost always cums at least 2-3 and he gets them off several times, one has to wonder what it takes to warrant "8 - went the extra mile".


You want to be a WK and defend the damsel in distress.Then BACK THAT SHIT UP. I read his reviews. Besides BBBJ and kissing and occasional toy play (which I don't recall requires extra points per TER guidelines) What is this so called "LONG LIST OF SERVICES" I see no mention Greek, no threesomes,

Your last review ,you gave the young lady a 9. http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=767475&user=386273  What long list of services were you afforded that made it a 9? I see nothing special...2 pops, BBBJ.

Perhaps you need to read the TER guidelines for review posting.


"7. In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.

This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score."




The operative word is ELIGIBLE....... No where does it say say that it is mandatory that a provider receives extra points for performing said services. As a matter of fact it clearly states "This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score"




7= Hot time
IMHO his review sounded like he had a "hot time"
Perhaps his expectations are higher then most.
That however is HIS opinion and it is HIS reveview. He is entitled to both.
$350-$500 I would think you are justified to expect 2 cups if there is time in a session.

the score, it's that the review is fake.  You keep arguing that he gave the right score when she's claiming that it's a fake review.  Does it really fucking matter if he met the scoring guidelines if his review if FAKE?

Today, I think I will read your reviews, and determine which ones are flawed, and not rated properly, or out of line with other reviewers.
YOU seem to enjoy doing this to your fellow reviewers.
YOU also need to stop bawling every time someone uses an alias. YOU use them daily.
My points have been made.
Have a nice day.

we haven't had a good pissing match here in a while...No one should write fake reviews.  We all agree on that and for SQ I feel sorry..
but I can't help it love the drama...

Who is going to start the next fight?

I got a totally fake review from a hobbyist that obviously writes fake reviews for fun and VIP credit.  

I did not meet the man plain and simple.  Neither do I offer swallowing and throat fucking as part of my service.  I respect the review system here on TER.  Why would I fucking lie about a good review to begin with?  It doesn't make fucking sense?!  I have gotten a few sevens and maybe scores lower than that but they were real and not FAKE!

The ONLY reason why I am posting about it is to warn you, the hobbyist.  I am getting all these e-mails asking for the said service and I am wasting my time answering them all.  It's misleading, let alone inconvenient.


My mistake for warning you.  I will be retiring from the boards in a few months anyway to concentrate on my career and family.  

Sloane

No response whatsoever.  A couple of times too.

Hmmmmm....makes you think doesn't it???

S

aliases.  I use them for humor or informational purposes.  I have no problem with people using aliases, except for a couple of occasions. Asking for information about a provider, and when attacking another board member.

And for the record, I do not ENJOY attacking others and if you go back and read my original post, I was not "attacking" anyone.  I was simply pointing out an error in mathematics and therefore an error in the poster's logic and also the fact that the reviewer has no board presence.

You clearly are quite angry about something and now you are launching an attack at me.  What have I done to anger you?  

I made a couple of points on a discussion board and now you want to personally attack me?  

You want to call my integrity in to question?

So because I used my real handle and you disagree with my points, you are now going to publicly attack me and disparage me?

Again I ask, why such vitriol for me and such vigorous defense of this reviewer?


BTW, I have PMed trudny and informed him of this discussion and asked for his thoughts.  No response.

I asked him to come forward and clear this up if he can.  No response.

I asked him to contact me if I had erred in my analysis of him.  No response.

If the review is really a fake PM the guy and email admin and move on....don't suck up the board with more of your bitchin' and moaning.  I personally have had it with you and the "crying game".  It seems its just a ploy to get attention.  It must be really slow for you since you have so much time to complain.
Perhaps you should consider offering some of the services listed in your last 4-6 reviews. Maybe you won't have time to BITCH about the little things you don't do!
Just my opinion. don't hate!

It made my day.  Have a great one too!

S

Let's rename the board: THE SLOANE QATES BITCH & MOAN SOAPBOX, then those of us with real business to discuss here will take a lesson: find something totally trivial to complain about and get some attention.  
Why am I posting? I want this thing off the board! Its ridiculous!
Move along folks nothing to see here~ right Sloane?

you keep justifying the score, and fine, the score for services rendered is within the reviewer's purview, but if the review is fake, what does it really matter what the score is?

As for my reviews, I will discuss them with you when you come out from behind the alias and show me your reviews.  For all I know you have 200 or you could have none.  You could, in fact, be a lady for all I know.  

If you would like to discuss reviews, I will gladly do so, but I will not do so while you continue to fire your attacks from behind the protection of an alias.


BTW, if scores were the central issue, Sloane would probably have protested the 7/8 I gave her.  But she didn't, because I actually saw her and wrote an honest review.

I've read through this thread - and what catches my eye is that the focus for those defending the reviewer is - "hey - the score is good - what's the beef?"  However, they miss the point.

This review system works IF and ONLY IF the reviews are an accurate representation of what happened.... if a fictional depiction is posted - no matter how good - and it features services not provided then the next guy to go behind the door... will BE DISAPPOINTED!  and that will harm the lady - and make the reviews seem not so accurate...  HARMING AND DISCREDITING the TER COMMUNITY!  Wake up - smell the coffee.


I use to review under a different handle and can still find my old posts under that handle (but not my reviews)  all in all - in over 50 reviews I have given about 5 bad reviews... and guess what- NEVER in those bad reviews, did I ever get a complaint - ever!   Why? Because I stuck to the facts.  I have had ladies ask that I not disclse everything - and I did not.  

As an example - I have had ladies offer to see me off the clock - just to hang out.... and we've done so..... I've also had a lady call me outta the blue and ask me to escort her to a swingers club... and so on - but you will NOT find those things in my reviews... no need.  they are personal and have NOTHING To do with the ratings or review system.  Only what happens behind the door counts... and if one did not go through the door... then it is an abomination to the review system.

Quite frankly - all who are defending the reviewer with an alias... well - that says it all....  

and I say it again, Sloane is a pillar of our local community - anytime i've ever needed anything from her wrt the community she gladly offers assistance.  common guys - Is this really how we treat our own?  

But this thread is getting a bit tired. Some things are YMMV, and sometimes a gal does things once, (or a few times) with someone that she doesn't normally do with all. ( Ex. I've reamed a few girl's asses that say they don't do Greek in their profile). I'm NOT saying that's the case with Sloane, but she doesn't want to be known as a "Throat Fuck Queen" regardless.  

Also, there is a rule against using more than one alias in a thread. Gang, please refrain from that, or you will be moderated. (You know who you are).

I like a good train wreck myself, but this has gotten to be a bit much. Let's play nicely.

guy breaking well established and posted message board rules?

Have we had one alias defending another alias of the same guy?  If so, I think that they should have to change their posts while they still can to show what aliases are from the same person.

JMTC