I'm new at this and have seen only 7 providers over a span of a year+. only 2 have had accurate pictures and their age was close. But none of the recent reviews stated that. I understand not wanting to hurt a good providers business but I would rather then not post vs post and perpetuate the misconception. How are we to believe the posts? Thoughts/comments?

From what I understand the guys will want your input on the girls so they will want you to post.  The problem is not everyone posts accurate reviews; so you have the dilemma you mention.

One person might think she looks just like her pics , or better, while someone else does not..
thats what makes this hobby an adventure..sometimes in paradise and sometimes not...lol....

thanks Holly. yes, the dilemma comes into play when a provider is excellent but the pictures are from 5 or more years ago. they provided an excellent so you don't to hurt their business. people change quite a bit in 5 yrs. especially in my case, where I prefer over 35. but if you're expecting 35-40 and get 49 well...... also, i've seen someone described as thin and she was a + size!!! no solution just wanted to know what others thought about the reliability of reviews. also, always wondered if providers wanted or did not want reviews written about them.

Yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but if a lady advertises she is 29 and is in fact 35 or older that's an issue.

You should know also twl6699, that once a providers profile is established (by her 1st reviewer?) as you enter that info in your review it doesn't change whats on her profile. i.e If I am the 1st to review provider X and I say shes 21-25, the next hobbiest to review her may not have agreed, but i don't think their input on that part of the review form has any bearing on what I write intitially. (Meaning its not some sort of cumulative average of what all of Provider X's reviewers thaought on each question) I don't know how you'd affect what it says there other than to post a problem report.