I noticed my review of Tiffany went up.  I would like to clarify something before I get flamed by previous reviewers.  I rated her a 9 in looks and 7 in performance.  The "7" in performance seems a little out of whack with all the previous 9's and 10's.  However, if you read my review, you will see that I do not participate in several acronyms which would otherwise give a provider a 9 or 10 rating.  So, although for me personally, within my "range of motions"/comfort zone she was a "ten" as far as what I was looking for, I can't give that rating since all acronyms on the rating scale were not performed.  Hence my rating of 7.  ...if that makes any sense.  I think it does make sense for an honest evaluation.

What was performed, was great! ...hope to see her again soon.

Sorry about that

I appreciate you trying to explain your low rating of a 7. However that will not help hobbyist that will not be fortunate enough to read your post. What's even more confusing is your last 2 reviews of 8 and 9 and yet still you claim Tiffany is your new ATF. The review sounds like you had a great time..

You know, Padawan you seem to be quite the critic, maybe you should post some reviews of your own.

Ok.....I am confused too...lol

This isn't a slam against Joe but damn these are his own words.

"Tiffany was exactly what I have been looking for. ...a local provider, easy to set up, easy access, very attractive, lean and toned physique and willing to do everything I asked. I have been disappointed by visitors when they haven't lived up to the advertised fantasy. Tiffany however, did live up to my expectations, and she has become my new ATF. I will definitely go back."



Just because Joe did not partake of any additional acronyms that should not have stopped him from giving  his session an 8 or 9. That would be like me seeing a provider and requesting  a BJ only. The provider gives me an awesome BJ  and I giver her a  low review because I didn't want full service.

Now that wouldn't be fair would it?

If you "don't participate in several acronyms which would otherwise give a provider a 9 or 10 rating", then you shouldn't penalize the provider for it!  If you had 5 acronyms to rate, but only participated in 2, then only rate her on 2 (i.e., take the 3 acronyms you didn't participate in out of your rating completely).  After all, you wouldn't rate all the Virgin Islands if you'd only been to 1 of them.

good point chris, that's why I always read the review not just look at the numbers.  But, as you know a "10" is hard to achieve with out CIM and anal.

If she was "EXACTLY" what he was looking for, then she should get a 9 or 10. Who the hell searches for a 7?


-- Modified on 1/15/2007 1:24:10 PM

I agree, but TER is notorious about changing ratings based on service provided.  I seemed to remember not to long ago someone posted with this exact beef that their rating was lowered.  

Sorry Macy, I'm having a bad day, fucking eagles suck!

relevant stuff.... it would be nice to see - a score that is rated as a 10 for 80% of services... or 6 for 90% of services... rating such as:
Services - one point for each delivered....
Kissing - 1
kissing with tongue - 1
Vaginal sex - 1
Multiple positions with Vaginal sex - 1
DATY- 1
Digit insertion - 1
Anal sex - 1
BJ - 1
BBBJ - 1
BBBJTC - 1

and so on...

in that manner - you would know 'how well" the services were offered... heck - I would give a gal a points on personality... cause know what, some don't have one!

And well, some do... Macy is filled with personality!  

I agree that it may not have been a "10" but  by his own admission should have been at least an 8. A 9 if she is his ATF.......


7 for an ATF who I think just gave him an hour for $200........(assumeing he did get the special)

Did Andy Reid jump off sides on 3rd down?? NO
Did Andy Reid drop 2 passes out of the backfield? NO
Did Andy Reid miss tackle after tackle? NO
Did Andy Reid screw up 2 straight plays with 2nd and 1? NO
Was he wrong for punting, YES, but he didn't blow the game.

in this case are exactly what he said he gave her, not based on TER lowering the rating (shockingly)

Hey I gave an outstanding performance, if I must say so myself!!! (of course) and even got an "o" in the meantime. Should have been an 8 or 9 but oh well! Yes- it was a discount.

lol, yeah I saw, which makes him even makes him a bigger jerk!

EXACTLY! TER ratings standards are so completely inconsistent. For example, the beef that was raised by Christophtrac a couple of months back. A performance rating that should easily have been a 10 was lowered to a 9 and the reason they gave was that she couldn't receive a 10 because that would require multiple guys. I have some 10's but I have NEVER done that, (errr...professionally anyway haha) or in these cases even greek.

Yeah...I specifically commented that TER recently lowered my rating for our own lovely Macy and a visit I had not too long ago with Tina Pink of Phoenix.  Look around on other local boards, this is beginning to become a consistent problem with a lot of reviewers who have many reviews.  There is a real lack of consistency going on at TER central HQ.  There is a lot more to a session that is subjective and non-quantifiable than just marking off check boxes.  If an expereinced reviewer (lets say at least 10 to 15 reviews) gives a lady a score, then TER should give that reviewer the benfit of the doubt unless it is just plain wacky.

I've kind of gotten to the point where I can only put so much faith in the reviews and have started doing a lot of back channel reviewing and searching the boards in a lady's hometown for more "real" reviews.

I was away from my computer since yesterday and never imagined this would erupt like it did.  

I thought I was following the TER guideliines - like someone above said: "you don't get 9s and 10s w/o CIM or Greek"  so I thought I was following guidelines.

Chris (I think it was you) your point is well taken.  If I asked for certain services and they were delivered really well, maybe I should have posted a 9 or 10.  I guess that's fair.  However, I have seen reviewers get ripped to shreds on this board when they say they got only bj and rate the girl as a 9 or 10 'cause it was the "best they ever had" and someone chimes in with: "give me a break, how could she be a 9 or 10 - she didn't do this, that, or the other thing"  now c'mon, admit it, you've seen those discussion threads too.  So again I thought I was doing the right thing?

I like Bizarro's take on the whole rating thing: maybe we should be able to score a 9 on 70% of the services!  That's a novel approach!!  maybe this rating thing is, well, "over rated" =)).

Tiffany: you were great - I said that several times, I never said you weren't.  It WAS a "hot time" ..that's why I picked #7 - "hot time" that's the choice when filling out the review form.  As for the discount comment, let me remind you that you put it out there as an offer.  I only accepted your offer.  I didn't approach you and try to negotiate your prices down?  I think that comment was a little unfair.

Macy, I don't appreciate being called a jerk.  

I was a perfect gentleman with Tiffany, we both had a good time.  She said she did, and she said she would see me again.

Ya know, someone mentioned my other reviews - if you notice, they are from a LOOONG time ago 2 or 3 years.  I was new at hobbying then and over the years I have read hundreds of reviews.  As I mentioned I have read enough reviews where the girls were rated 9s and 10s only for the reviewer to get flamed for the reasons I said above.  

my previous reviews??  Yeah, my last one was back in 2004.  I have hobbied since then ...I haven't written reviews - gee I wonder why?  funny isn't it??  What's the sense if this is what happens?

I thought I was doing the right thing.  Sorry if I caused anyone undue harm.  I guess I'll just go back to lurking instead of trying to participate and help out.

Thanks for all your support =).