Philadelphia

D
JoHawk 7 Reviews 11070 reads
posted

definately D.  For a true GFE experience the lady must be at least a little turned on.  There are plenty of providers of many different shapes and colors available to choose from.

Recently a member of the Boston board community posted regarding his frustration with a local agency. According to the poster, he was refused services because he is black. Other threads relevant to this topic have appeared this week on the Florida, Boston, Atlanta and National boards.

This topic goes beyond the issue of racism. Some would say that providers should see everyone. We know that, realistically, this is not the case. Some ladies impose age restrictions or weight or other restrictions related to physical appearance as well as race restrictions. What is the answer?

A. See everybody or get out of the business.

B. The other restrictions are okay but restrictions based on race are not.

C. It’s her body; she can impose whatever restrictions that she feels necessary.

D. The answer is C but she must tell us about it upfront.

E. [Your solution]

This is a hot button topic without question. Take a look at the existing threads.

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=19377&boardID=9&page=6

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=77725&boardID=12&page=1

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=7407&boardID=16&page=1

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=15420&boardID=18&page=1

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=19878&boardID=9&page=1

I would like to invite everyone who has an opinion on this topic to a chat in the Boston chat room next Wednesday, February 18th @ 9:00 P.M. ET/ 6:00 P.M. PT. (If you’re located in another time zone and you’re confused, just enter the chat room the night before. At least you’ll be guaranteed a good seat. ;)

thirsty

fortitude8562 reads

...and in lieu of a NY/Phila. chat next week, I'll opt to join in on this one.  Hope to see you all there.

F.

-- Modified on 2/11/2004 9:12:59 AM

D

definately D.  For a true GFE experience the lady must be at least a little turned on.  There are plenty of providers of many different shapes and colors available to choose from.

Maybe the prospective client who has been offended and considers themselves a victim of prejudice could sue in Federal Court under the Fourteenth Amendment.  I'm sure those crazy judges in San Francisco would intervene and make sure that everyone has equal access not only to the courts, but to providers as well.  Good luck.

squeeky12746 reads

As a non-caucasion who enjoys ladies from all ethnicities, I would not want to "have at it" with someone who really does not want to be with, or might even be "repulsed" by, me.  While I don't endorse discrimination of any kind, I think a provider gives more of herself in the transaction than a simple good or service and, understandably, might not be willing to extend herself personally and physically to those who do not appeal to her.  Regardless of whether it is right or wrong for a provider to restrict her services, I just want an hour or two with someone who is committed to making me feel good and having a good time with me.  I am not in this "hobby" to crusade for the right to pay someone for a good time against her wishes.  Therefore, I would prefer that any provider who has restrictions make them public so that I can move on to the next lovely lady.  Answer "D" for me!

Register Now!