"a single answer from the USUAL APOLOGISTS," why would anyone waste their time explaining anything to someone who is openly biased and completely closed-minded?  I certainly don't think I can change your mind about anything, so by not answering the question, I can avoid a 15 foot thread that goes on for three days, and still doesn't get anywhere.  I consider that a win for me.  Lol

Well said, and historically even with the various personality conflict, alpha status clashes and some stalkers the board participants were generally willing to listen to someone else and try to give consideration to the position rather than just looking for the ways to "shoot the other argument down". We saw a lot fewer right side threads then too.

Frankly, I don’t remember many, if any, right margin threads before the little rocket felcher invaded our board.

I've seen no issues with people arguing with me  - - they still argue with me. They  just do so selectively.  

the K-Girl scene in LA, OC and LV?

I don't recall any on this board since before TER went dark in the US for 20 months.  We certainly didn't have any DURING the blackout because there was only a handful of Kgirl fans posting here at all, often days between posts.   Since December of 2019, on this board, we seem to be able to get there with only two or three participants.  Lol

Please do tell. Disagreements and backs and forths are fundamental to discussion imo.  

to reason with someone that doesn't know they are wrong about something, and 90% of the 12-15 foot threads here come down to this. I have decided, albeit belatedly because I will never get that time back, that for me, a prolonged exchange is not a good use of my time.  I will give my position and supporting info, maybe have one exchange after that before I can tell if the other party does not really have the experience in the Kgirl scene to see my point.  No sense in repeating it all ad nauseum with a guy who has no shared experiences with me.  

unmoderated public board on TER.  Its the wild west, so all of the posters get away with things there that you can't get away with on other boards.  If you haven't figured it out yet, my main focus there is to needle the koolaid drinkers, and I seem to do a pretty good job of it.  I do take some poetic license, as many authors do, but its fun to watch them come unglued.  Obviously, I do not take that board seriously, so don't use that as an example to justify something here like BLRPOS likes to do.  I purposely say outrageous things over there just to irritate certain posters there who are WAY too serious.  Lol  Here, I try to be as accurate as possible with the information that I have to share.  

-- Modified on 8/22/2021 5:27:29 PM

"doesn't know they are wrong about something" implies lack of understanding of argument.  

In the KGirl forum we have this one poster (no names revealed by me, but I hear he might commonly be referred to as the little rocket felcher) who beats the same dead horse thread after thread. It's not that I disagree with his position about guys refusing to write negative KGirl reviews or K-orgs using misleading photos, it's that he beats that same dead horse over and over in thread after thread. It's like he thinks the rest of us haven't read his prior posts so he just repeats them over and over, in thread after thread, forcing the threads into the right margin. IMO we would be a better community if he wasn't here.

On the contrary, it seems that cdl says you do disagree with me.

a girl or an org of any wrongdoing based on hearsay.  Unless this is a personal experience you had with a girl or a booker, its best to keep your speculative attacks to yourself.  Would you call a girl a "bitch" because someone else said she was?  Maybe she was justified in her attitude based on something the monger did.  If YOU saw her and YOU thought she was a bitch, then you have every right to share your PERSONAL experience.  

All the little felcher has is hearsay. He hasn’t posted a review in 18 months, and before I put him on ignore I remember him saying he couldn’t afford to pay his TER fees. So he doesn’t contribute financially, and he doesn’t contribute reviews. I guess all he really does is sit in a homeless shelter and start arguments on our community boards to get his jollies. Man I wish he could get a job so we wouldn’t have to deal with his repetitive bullshit. Sorry you’re still dealing with him.

What? I didnt hear that he's a pos. I'm calling him a pos because of yes, what I heard about their bl practice.  

"There was one booker in SoCal that, after you passed the screening, he would tell you that the girls always appreciate positive reviews, but if you score lower than a 7, you might not be invited back. That's about as in-your-face as it gets. "

you are speculating about.  The agency that was doing that is no longer in business.  They were busted by the Feds five years ago.  And by the way, if you want to stay off of ignore with me, then when I say this is my last post on a topic, don't start haranguing me with PM's.  That just makes you a common stalker.  If you want to be in the same group as Knobby Hunter and Kumstain, then keep stalking.  

Ah yes, very coincidentally the girl you called out was not in business anymore. And this socal booker is also not in business anymore.

coeur-de-lion
yesterday 1 reads
users post is ignored

I took a look about a year ago and what I found was that prior to 2020 I think we had 4 or 5 threads that had enough posts to make it worth looking at to see where they went. None actually got to the right side (IIRC) most seemed to be 1/2 to 3/4 the way.  

Argumentative and heated discussions are part of discussions, just as negative reviews are a part of review site. I don't expect someone with no negative reviews to understand that though.  

that there are orgs that went out when CV went dark in March of 2018.  The ONE I referred to was from a bust before that,  but how do you confuse ONE booker with "those bookers are out of business now."  I know hundreds of girls that are retired.  So what is the purpose of calling them out if you can't see them.  If you want to know details, pay for VIP and read the reviews.  They say which org the girl was at.  So the bookers that closed during after the closure of CV and during the TER blackout are pieces of shit, too?  

Publicly, meaning on a board post? A review isn't public enough? I figure you'll say not everyone has VIP, well wouldn't that be on the person for not utilizing TER's resources? But, back to board posts. I am under the impression TER wants the info about the girls in reviews and won't approve them for posting. On a BBFS thread, top tier girls came up. I posted, who are top tier girls. There weren't any replies! I started a thread, "Who are top tier Kgirls". The Moderators didn't approve it, said it was a shill/AD post! I went back and forth, telling them it wasn't and there were similar posts about naming girls for spinner, BJ, looks, etc! It looks like a post that should be in a review won't be approved for the boards! The Moderators can be very selective, IMO.

"You're not salvageable as a productive member here."  

version of Laffy from the P & R board.  More posts than the  next four posters combined, and none of it from personal knowledge or experience.  If you can justify VIP so you can read reviews, then you're not very active in the hobby.  Saving yourself from ONE bad experience pays for a whole year of VIP.  I have never understood how serious mongers can justify passing on the reviews.  Its what this site was created for.  Perhaps he has been blacklisted everywhere, and that would explain his hard-on for orgs.  The orgs bring us these lovely Kgirls.  Most of the girls would not make it as indies, due to their lack of English, so its a win-win for us and the girls having the middle men, IMO.  

This is a great idea. Many of us already have the little rocket felcher on ignore. If he would do the same for us, then we could get back to our forums being used to share valuable information about escorts instead of arguing with rocket into the right margins about his repetitive issues. It would be a win-win for everyone. Please, I hope!

I did not misquote anything you've said. I literally put everything you've said in quotes. Every time I press you to name names publicly , you manage come to up with nothijg but excuses. Just like your boy Jensen, he had the opportunity to make me stop calling you out by simply mentioning a negative experience  he admitted he's had, by naming a name publicly.  

I haven't put anyone on ignore on years anywhere. I don't like echo chambers. The more different opinions, the better. I like to survey and view the whole picture. Losing info is not good. Imagine Sun Tzu saying "just ignore him".  

If it walks and talks like a troll....and sometimes filtering out information improves the signal/noise ratio.

him because he can't see the details without VIP, and he has told us that he has let that lapse several months ago.  I've been doing this since 2008, and I can't think of how I would choose girls without reading reviews.  I don't mind TOFTT once in awhile, but without being able to see reviews, every girl you see is TOFTT.  I think he wants review-like details posted on the board, so he doesn't have to pay to see them.  Just a guess.  I could be wrong, but I don't think so.  

-- Modified on 8/24/2021 10:00:45 AM

Nonsense. How would I be able to pm you without VIP?  

"And yes, I'm a proponent of mongers who dont have any access whatsoever to get the important details."

My goal is never to undermine anything, besides shitty practices by Pos and surrounding "insiders".  

I've got a couple of questions, so I hope you'll answer them the best you can.

CDL says rocket has TER VIP because he receives PM's from rocket:
"...if you want to stay off of ignore with me, then when I say this is my last post on a topic, don't start haranguing me with PM's."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/no-it-was-not-the-booker-----27188?page=1

Does he actually think anyone bothers to read the multiple links he posts with each comment?! 😂😂😂

I'm surprised the self-proclaimed link-meister could not find the link where Rocket said he didn't have VIP.  Its below, and all I had to do to find it was take him off ignore while I searched for 30 seconds.  It was posted EIGHT months ago.  So this means DC didn't lie, and I did get a couple of PM's from Rocket LAST WEEK, which was EIGHT months later.  I don't think he would deny it if you want to ask him.  So at the end of all this, the ONLY one who lied is BLRPOS when he claimed that either DC or I lied.  He is also that ONLY one that ends up looking like a complete buffoon.  BLRPOS has not learned that its better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you're an idiot, than to open it, and remove all doubt.  

You are such a whiner, always going down on CDL to protect him.  The two of you together = ZERO.

We know that you are a self promoter.
We know that you are a habitual liar.
We know that you are CHEAP.

...that I quoted where he said YESTERDAY IN THE PRESENT TENSE that rocket can't afford TER VIP:
"(rocket) admits he can't afford $200 per year for TER VIP..."