Shifting the focus of the debate. A more clever tactic than I was previously willing to expect from you. But, it still won't work. You were clearly advising the OP to go after BP girls and then said "...those girls don't ask for a thumbprint for verification...".
I primarily responded to that second piece of your advice. I was not taking issue with BP girls per se. I am taking issue with the recommendation to see "BP girls that don't screen". So...go ahead and tell me the the more experienced punters will support that position. I doubt it.
And since when does volume of reviews really mean anything? That's like saying "I pick up every random gun I see, point it at my head, and pull the trigger. I'm not dead yet, so, I must be doing something right." No...you're just lucky. Luck does not constitute a technique or a plan. For that matter, how many punters have posted their record of arrests or fines? I.E. the number of times they were caught?
Maybe we should have an LEO session review option to start capturing that data:
How big we're his hands? HUGE.
Did his body cavity search give you wood? Yes, but only 1/4 chub; it was a little rough.
Describe the atmosphere: very much like L&O SVU
Did your wife/SO find out? not yet, but just a matter of time
But I digress...
The point is...without that data, you have an incomplete and non-representative sample set. You're in a weak position to make a recommendation based on that data.
But, I do appreciate your attempt at levity. That always makes the verbal jousting more fun. Guns and cars ARE cool. I'll spend my big money on the girls though.
The silver lining to all of this? We aren't competing for providers.
Posted By: OSP
I wasn't referring to me though. The most prominent reviewers use BP.
Now for our resident know it all.........my price range is simply my choice of what I consider p4p to be worthy of. I pay top dollar for cars and guns..........NOT women.
A man has to have priorities lmao. Sex isn't a priority