First of all, the numerical part of the system is faulty because some inflate their grades while others simply find one person a 9 or a 10 that others would say is a 7 at best. So take the numerical ratings with a grain of salt, and rely more on the photos and the Juicy Details.
However, photos can be fakes, air-brushed or old. And the part of the review listing whether the provider looks like her pictures is probably as old as her first review, so check that date.
Finally, if you meet her and find she's not the same person as in the pix, or that she has changed dramatically, you are free to leave. This is a tough one to do, but some people do it. Just be sure you haven't dropped the envelope, entered her room or apt., or let her into yours. Best of luck.
I am newbie still on the sidelines. I've never engaged services, Ive learned a lot through the various threads. Still I have some questions about the Profiles
There is one thing that concerns me. I'm am one picky dude when it comes to women. My women have all been 8-10's (with a few 5's, who at the time, looking through beer glasses, looked like 10's, ). I've been lucky. Not bragging, just background. My thing has always been a beautiful face and full, ample breasts.
Many, if not most, profiles, reviews (VIP access), and websites 'About Me" descriptions I've read, are at odds with their pictures. Looks/Descriptions are exaggerated, or, in some profiles, ages clearly understated. I'm also assuming providers are posting their best shots.
I want an accurate, recent photo depiction & description: hair length and color, weight, etc.
Are my concerns valid or are my standards too high?
What do you do when you meet for an appointment, and the package you ordered did not arrive as described?
I do not mean to offend any providers. I have seen a lot of incredible, accurate profiles, and have looked at only a fraction.
Thanks ahead of time for your comments.
Totally understand your concerns. I am a provider that is just going back into the industry and put up a basic website to test the waters. Because of message board outcry - I put the web up without photos - then "they" weren't fond of body only fetish shots - ...ha.... I posted some purely candid snapshots grainy - and nothing fancy - prior to posting anything airbrushed and professional. It was mentioned that at least this gives them a "real" idea of what I look like. And, eliminates much of that "what will show up at my door" factor
Even when I am looking at other providers' sites I don't know how much is airbrushed and how much is real unless there is a review to be read!
Good luck and I am sure some hobbyists will chime in soon!
First of all, the numerical part of the system is faulty because some inflate their grades while others simply find one person a 9 or a 10 that others would say is a 7 at best. So take the numerical ratings with a grain of salt, and rely more on the photos and the Juicy Details.
However, photos can be fakes, air-brushed or old. And the part of the review listing whether the provider looks like her pictures is probably as old as her first review, so check that date.
Finally, if you meet her and find she's not the same person as in the pix, or that she has changed dramatically, you are free to leave. This is a tough one to do, but some people do it. Just be sure you haven't dropped the envelope, entered her room or apt., or let her into yours. Best of luck.
...that if you do see the lady and find that some things on her profile need updating file a problem report and get it updated. I do this usually after consulting the provider about it as long as it's merely something that needs updating.
I wouldn't feel the need to consult her if it's a deliberate deception ( or seems to be) or an inaccuracy that once was true but has been allowed to remain in order to deceive. I have actually never run into this with any of the providers I've seen. All of them have been eager for me to make sure their profile is accurate.
One golden rule that works well is: if it looks too good to be true, then it probably is.
Pics that look like they were taken from highly professional photo shoots are always suspect. It may just be downloaded porn. Of course, if we're talking about very high price escorts, the can probably afford it. But for the average independent provider, the pics should look somewhat amatuer.
Personally I don't care for perfect beauties, I just think you're in for a high maintenance chick who is gonna make it more about her than you.
Sometimes the one photo that's different than all the others is the tip off. Like there are three shots of a girl with an okay body showing her face. Then the fourth photo is a doggy pose photo with no face and its the greatest ass you've seen in your life. Maybe the first three are the real girl, but the misrepresentation is a red flag.
and judge for yourself. Check the profile & reviews about if the photos are real & are how she looks today.
In provider photos there is always an understandable desire show the subject in her best light. Often, though, certain poses, camera angles, cropping, soft-focus and lighting are chosen to hide or play down unattractive features. For example, if she's arching her back or stretching her legs in every shot, you have to suspect that gravity has taken a toll.
And while I understand that many providers don't show their face out of privacy concerns, I've learned the hard way that that's not always the reason. Unfortunately, if you're particular about a beautiful face, you cannot put ANY faith in appearance ratings or descriptions in reviews, either. You've observed this already, and I've suffered the consequences with so-called model material who showed no face pics.
All of which matters here because, unlike with outright fake or outdated pics, your only option is to grin and bear it. Artfully misleading pics aren't really grounds for claiming she broke the agreement. You could walk away, but you'd still be obligated to pay.
Another trick is clothing which conceals the tummy even if she exposes her breasts... Or a rear view... seen one AH you've seen them all... no idea on tummy or breasts. This is why I Hold Off on any such. I REQUIRE a variety of views which added together shows essencially everything.
And while I understand that many providers don't show their face out of privacy concerns, I've learned the hard way that that's not always the reason. Unfortunately, if you're particular about a beautiful face, you cannot put ANY faith in appearance ratings or descriptions in reviews, either. You've observed this already, and I've suffered the consequences with so-called model material who showed no face pics.
All of which matters here because, unlike with outright fake or outdated pics, your only option is to grin and bear it. Artfully misleading pics aren't really grounds for claiming she broke the agreement. You could walk away, but you'd still be obligated to pay.
I called a girl one time and she was not the girl in the pics at all...I ended up paying her 50 dollars just to leave my room..the girl in the pic was a 10 and the girl who showed was a 2...
This is an entirely different issue than the misleading pics we were discussing. Maybe you already know this, but you should always be sure the right girl shows up for an outcall before letting her into your room. It's so much easier to shut the door in her face than it is to shoo her out.
Although you don't owe her a penny, you might offer her a few buck for gas, and to keep her from making a scene in the hallway. But giving her any more only encourages those people to keep pulling the same fraud on others.
-- Modified on 8/1/2011 6:05:27 PM
no wonder she didnt want to meet in the bar for a drink first...makes sense Thanks