Even if you don't suffer from ED, do these medications help "enhance" the experience (sensitivity, longevity, etc..)?

Is any one medication better than the other?

Thanks

This question comes up all the time.  A brave person would have clicked that listtle button labeled Find a Message, but you are seemingly not that brave (big sigh.....)

None of the medications you have mentioned will do anything for you if you do not suffer from ED.  Now, many folks are going to jump all over me here and claim "I take it and I've had good luck" or "I know guys who have no ED problems and they last twice as long and cum eight times an hour" but all these add up to something called anectdotal evidence.  It means nothing.

Do some research on the web or library and look up the case studies done by the companies that produce said drugs.  They prove that if you don't suffer ED, then you will receive very minor, if any, results from taking them.  The possible side effects far outweigh these minor (and statistically insignificant) possible benefits.  About the only lift you will get is a psychological benefit, and personally, I get a better psychological high knowing my wallet is heavier with cash since I didn't throw it away on something I didn't need in the first place.

Levitra is best.  Viagra works well (great wood), but has more side effects (acid stomach, blue vision, nasal congestion etc.)
Cialis is a waste of money. Less side effects than Levitra or Viagra, but less rock hard wood. I don't have ED, but Now use Levitra with providers to get more bang for my buck (pun intended). I find hard ons last longer and you get wood again more quickly with Levitra and Viagra. All these scrips work for many hours. Use on empty stomachs without too much booze.

This is exactly the kind of "evidence" I was talking about.  The statement "I find..." provides anectdotal evidence.  Lacking ED, the only benefit gained is psychological, not physiological.  Trust the case studies, they won't lead you astray.  They clearly point out that if you don't have ED, taking any of these drugs is throwing away money.

Ok drug cop, not true.

I took part in a double blind study of viagra and what you're saying is not true. Yes you shouldn't take it without a perscription, but it does provide excellent wood. Are you a doc or pharmacist. Let the man try it for himself rather than saying it won't work it wont work

BTW
Haing taken all three I'd go with Levitra

Of course if you are taking it WITH a prescription, then you are almost certainly suffering from ED.  No physician worth their diploma would prescribe you a drug you don't need and that could endanger your life.

No, I don't have ED. I use these drugs recreationally to enhance the hobbying experience. Anybody wanting to experiment with any of these scrips can simply go online.  A few questions are asked by the person on the phone who is "overseen" by a supposed Doc. The Levitra, Viagra etc. can be delivered the next morning via FedEX in a regular envelope. You can even have it shipped to your business. USA TODAY also lists many 800 numbers for oredering.

Everybody can believe whatever they want, and in this country are free to do whatever they want.  You want to put your health in jeopardy taking medication you don't need, fine, that's your business.  I'm OK, you're OK.

I deal with the companies that make these drugs all the time.  It's part of my job.  After talking with many reps, I decided to do the research, and it convinced me, beyond any doubt (along with the FDA) that if you don't have ED you get zero physiological benefit from these drugs, but do increase your chance of health problems.  

One other note as I leave this conversation (as I won't convince anybody that truly believes that Viagro, Levitra or Cialis helps them when they don't have ED) - it's been pretty well proven that a high percentage of these drugs purchased through on-line pharmacies are rip-offs.  These on-line companies quite often offer bargain generics, which don't exist as none of these drugs have been licensed outside the companies that make them.  Many of the so called "name brand" drugs are also knock-off ripoffs.  They operate under the caveat emptor domain, or let the buyer beware.

Be careful out there!

Why are you generalizing ED as a physiological problem?  The psychological causes of ED is also well documented.  If the symptom is psychological, the effect/benefit of the drug can & will be physiological.  

True?