would rather do the 2 hours than the 1.5. The thought of a half hour makes me feel like I need to rush before my time is up. I think it is a negative price point, just remove it.

You have very classy and beautiful pics, that still leave something to the imagination; which to me is a great part of being a hobbiest. Hopefully we will get to meet when you travel to the West Coast.

You picked a very good photographer, and the subtle colors are easy on the eye, and the text easy to read.

I also think the rates are very competitive for NYC, and do make sense (often a rarity, sadly.)  I take it that you have no standing incall apartment, and therefore have to rent a good hotel yourself for incalls, and want to reflect that cost in your rates.  That is perfectly understandable.  Gals with standing incalls do charge more for outcall because they have to cover the fixed cost of their incall plus add the cost of time and travel to a gentleman's place.

As for minimum times for appointment, there is no right or wrong.  Some part of the market will not want to meet for a 90 minute minimum, but the segment that does will be a better quality one, and there is no harm in going for quality over quantity.  It is your judgement call, and I think it is a good one.

The text content is very well written and informative too.

My only quibble is that I had to close out each photo before being able to open up the next.  It would be better to have navigation arrows that let one go to the next photo (fully opened) rather than have to navigate so much.


Now, get that email address on there and open up for business.

looks ready to launch..1.5 hour minimum is standard fare..should think about lowering 4 hour minimum for incall..a lot would prefer 1.5 on first encounter rather than 4 minimum..of course it depends on where your incall is..i assume your residence..also your outcall is $ 100 lees than your incall..usually is the opposite..good luck...

-- Modified on 2/3/2013 7:02:08 AM

Beautiful pics, easy to navigate . . . I agree with the comment that first time encounter should be 2 hrs . . . Makes me want to book a trip to NYC!

site, and tastefully done.  Navigation is easy, and I like how the photos open up.  One of my pet peeves is when the photos open and are barely larger than the thumbnail.  What is the point, right?  Yours are beautiful!  Have to say, I am not a big fan of the click ads on the photo pages though, but that's just my opinion.  I think the 1.5 hr minimum for new clients is good for both parties, but everyone has their own opinion on that.  I like the woody Allen quote, too.  Another of my favorites from him is "Love is the answer, but while you are looking for the answer, sex raises some really good questions"

It was easy to use.  Your pictures are beautiful...  but (and I don't feel pictures need to be explicit) I'd like to see a bit more which you clearly have.  Just a couple with more skin.  I think too many pictures can be a mistake.

Problem is with IE.  See if you can find a techie who can fix that.

First, I would def add more pics. Pictures are the most important feature of a ladies site when attracting a man's attention so dont short yourself there. Men are visual creatures. You are HIGHLY photogenic so since you are, use it to your advantage. Bikini pics with heels are usually very sexy without coming off slutty. Also, you should consider a few GND type pics i.e you with jeans and a sweater. There is a good percentage of guys that like the whole sweet GND thing and you never know what picture is going to do it for which guy.

Second, when you do add your email, make sure you show your actual email address and not just a have a form to fill out. Sometimes we just have a quick question about availability and we dont want to fill out a whole form just for that.

Other than that its fantastic. Easy on the eye, font size perfect, professional. Best of luck!

I think the site is very nice, however, a few more pictures in different settings would nice, I don't mind the 1.5 hours. If you have reviews, I would link them. I'm in LA just so you get a feel for us out here.  I do like the site though.

You, topless, in panties, hands over breasts hair over face.  Naughty...

"Originality" of website design doesnt score any style points with me. I want to see nice, large attractive pics, easy to find rates, something about her personally and a way to contact her, which she is working on. Her site does ALL of that. She stands out by her beauty and her reviews and her professionalism in her response time and.....ahem....her professionalism in her board posts. You see my dear Taylor, its "originality" of the person that counts, not the vehicle she chooses to market and advertise herself.

Hi Natalia,

I have one or two comments/suggestions (lovely work however and you may decide not even to take my suggestions). I prefer not to post them here however. Since you don't have pm capability yet, or an email listed, would you mind shooting me an email? I'm not positive if I can add my email to the post, but it's listed in the public profile section of my TER profile.

Kiss me,

Kate

work on being new positive.
You should've seen my cheesy site when I started out (yikes)...I was so freakin proud of myself.

Especially on the newbie board.  More like what I'd expect on GD.  But since you went there, "let's keep it real".  Your site is unique and certainly cheeky, and I like it.  But the reality is that web sites are just a place to get information in this game.  More than likely, anyone who visits your web site already knows about you from here, or P411, or some other site where guys go to find interesting ladies.  The marketing is already done!  It is just qualifying at that point, so what works for you and identifies your personality, and helps you zero in on guys that you can relate to is great, but not necessarily right for everyone.  I am no spring chicken, and I have been at this for a while and I have never met, or not met, with a lady solely on the basis of her web site. Originality is difficult to achieve using template sites as many newbies have to do, and really doesn't score extra points.  And, it doesn't necessarily make them a "clone".  When you are successful enought to pay a designer several k to build something truely "original" does it really pay you back?  Or is it just for status?  I have absolutely no doubt that you know and understand fully what guys want when you meet them.  But you might be a bit out of touch on the web site thing.  The truth is that by the time most men go to a lady's website it is about how easily they can get the info they need, i.e. how she looks, how much for her time, and how to make a date.  Sorry for the long diatribe.  All I am really trying to say is give a newbie a break

I really like your website: there's beauty in simplicity and all of the salient bases are covered without getting too flowery in prose or cluttered in layout. Your pictures are great! Your website gets an A

A 1.5 hr minimum for a new client isn't a turn off for me and as you establish a client base, and more importantly, a series of very good reviews, this requirement will be less onerous for others too.

What does turn me off is the 3hr minimum incall. So it looks like a client may have to pony up for either 3 hours (what if the chemistry isn't there?) or make arrangements at a hotel. Halfway decent hotels (not the Four Seasons or Mark but maybe the Marriot Marquis, etc...) will run about $400 so a hobbyist is pushing up against $1,000 for an introductory meeting. That's some pretty hallowed ground, even in NYC.  I can certainly understand your reluctance to turn your apartment into a revolving door but maybe there's a solution other providers have found that will work for you as well.

Good luck!