After all, would you want to read a review of a new restaurant by a reviewer who had a stomach bug when he was dining there?

why not hold off until you have a more rounded experience to report on? There's no hurry. (As long as you're not waiting another four years. lol) And you can still include mention of a previous visit in your review.

As for reviewing after a session like yours, there's no reason you can't, however there are pitfalls to be mindful of. Of course, it wouldn't be fair to the girl to blame her for a client's dysfunction (which you clearly appreciate).

But on the other hand, gushing about how grateful you were for her sympathy and kindness might not be very helpful for readers. This board is already plagued with members going overboard, treating reviews as a favor to providers who were nice to them. Reviews are primarily for other mongers wanting to gain intel about hot women who provide hot sex.

As right mentioned, reviewer are for mongers, not the lady. I will tell you, many mongers when they see a lady has recieved a 10 from a first time reviewer, totally discount the review, some don't even read the review, once they realize it's a first review.  

I would definitely wait till I saw her at least twice if not more. This is your first hobby experience and you have nothing to compare it against. You have 3 months, I would wait until I saw her again and possibly another lady as well to give meaning to your point of view. If she is well reviewed then she can easily wait a bit for a review.

I write the review on a w/p as soon as possible, so I can remember details.  Let it rest a few days, and go back and look at it.  If it needs editing, I do that, if not, I copy the stuff into the boxes, and submit it.  Have found this to be the best for me.

Lou

I had pretty much the same experience you did.  I wanted to be sure I could be fairly objective before I wrote a review.  It was pretty much the same as if I had written it immediately but at least I had some other experiences to compare it to.