Yes, it does, IF the stats are obtained correctly. A poll like this one is meaningless because of self-selection. You need a random sampling to calculate a reliable margin of error.
Regardless, I still think it's interesting that so many of the respondents are up for BBFS. Based on the comments I've read in various forums here, you are treated like an outcast if you admit to engaging in BBFS. And, yet, here we see, many people claim to be up for it.
Dude . . . bro . . . i have always suspected that poles like this are baloney, malarky, etc. It is one thing in the abstract to say I would, or I would not, do X, whatever X is. It is quite anothter to make the same decision in real life, with all the real life risks and consequences. In short, I question the accuracy of the pole. I'm just saying . . .
I can see this pole as being mostly accurate. Men are horny dinks who think with their little heads. That's why most of us are here in the first place.
The margin of error is 100%. It is not a scientific poll due to self-selection. It is interesting, though, that such a high number of people are saying "hell yes." And I suspect you are right about the reason for that. We probably wouldn't be on TER if we were the type of people who always play safe & conservative.
of error is based on many variables. Question is, what are the variables?
Posted By: AnitaBloughjob
The margin of error is 100%. It is not a scientific poll due to self-selection. It is interesting, though, that such a high number of people are saying "hell yes." And I suspect you are right about the reason for that. We probably wouldn't be on TER if we were the type of people who always play safe & conservative.
Yes, it does, IF the stats are obtained correctly. A poll like this one is meaningless because of self-selection. You need a random sampling to calculate a reliable margin of error.
Regardless, I still think it's interesting that so many of the respondents are up for BBFS. Based on the comments I've read in various forums here, you are treated like an outcast if you admit to engaging in BBFS. And, yet, here we see, many people claim to be up for it.
Polls and Surveys then to have inflated numbers. Privately people tend to act/behave differently.
As the matter at hand, I feel it will correct itself. One day a popular girl will unknowingly contract gonorrhea (or whatever), and in a matter of 2 weeks spread it to like 5 guys, who spread it to 20 girls, so forth and so on. Horror stories will arise, marriages will break up and everyone will be scared. Not to mention some guy will have a baby or be blackmailed by girl whose baby might be his...
So much trouble for moments of pleasure. I mean that's how condoms got popular in the first place. To prevent trouble.
I see no reason why a person would answer the poll in a way that does not represent their desire versus the topic of the poll. I have been an abnormally vocal supporter of TER's decision to post reviews that have, or imply BBFS in them. Before I get in a room with a woman, I want to know whether she may have been allowing men to poke her uncovered.
Some have brought up angry hobbyists or providers getting even by using the BBFS club against their target. If a provider is offering BBFS on her menu, she will have more than one review that states or implies that she does. A one shot review by an angry or jellous hobbyist shouldn't sink her with thoughtful hobbyists if no other reviewer confirms what the one outlier wrote. If a provider wants to get a hobbyists by implying that he tried BBFS with her, her agency or other providers can weigh her claim and provide vendication for the hobbyist.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
